<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.cleophon_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.cleophon_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="cleophon-bio-1" n="cleophon_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Cle'ophon</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Κλεοφῶν</label>).</p><p>1. An Athenian demagogue, of obscure and, according to Aristophanes (<bibl n="Aristoph. Frogs 677">Aristoph. Frogs 677</bibl>), of Thracian origin. The meanness of his
      birth is mentioned also by Aelian (<bibl n="Ael. VH 12.43">Ael. VH 12.43</bibl>), and is said
      to have been one of the grounds on which he was attacked by Plato, the comic poet, in his play
      called " Cleophon." (Schol. <hi rend="ital">ad Aristoph. l.c.</hi>) He appears throughout his
      career in vehement opposition to the oligarchical party, of which his political contest with
      Critias, as referred to by Aristotle (<bibl n="Aristot. Rh. 1.15.13">Aristot. Rh.
       1.15.13</bibl>), is an instance; and we find him on three several occasions exercising his
      influence successfully for the prevention of peace with Sparta. The first of these was in
       <date when-custom="-410">B. C. 410</date>, after the battle of Cyzicus, when very favourable terms
      were offered to the Athenians (<bibl n="Diod. 13.52">Diod. 13.52</bibl>, <bibl n="Diod. 13.53">53</bibl>; Wess. <hi rend="ital">ad loc.;</hi> Clinton, <hi rend="ital">F. H.</hi> sub anno
      410); and it has been thought that a passage in the " Orestes" of Euripides, which was
      represented in <date when-custom="-408">B. C. 408</date>, was pointed against Cleophon and his evil
      counsel. (See 1. 892, --<foreign xml:lang="grc">κἀπὶ τῷδ̓ ἀνίσταται ἀνήρ τις
       ἀθυρόγλωσσος</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="grc">κ</foreign>. <foreign xml:lang="grc">τ</foreign>. <foreign xml:lang="grc">λ</foreign>.) The second occasion was after the
      battle of Arginusae, <date when-custom="-406">B. C. 406</date>, and the third after that of
      Aegospotami in the following year, when, resisting the demand of the enemy for the partial
      demolition of the Long Walls, he is said to have threatened death to any one who should make
      mention of peace. (Aristot. apud <hi rend="ital">Schol. ad Aristoph. Ran.</hi> 1528; Aesch.
       <hi rend="ital">de Fals. Leg.</hi> p. 38, <hi rend="ital">c. Ctes.</hi> p. 75; Thirlwall's
       <hi rend="ital">Greece,</hi> vol. iv. pp. 89, 125, 158.) It is to the second of the above
      occasions that Aristophanes refers in the last line of the " Frogs," where, in allusion also
      to the foreign origin of Cleophon, the chorus gives him leave to fight to his heart's content
      in his <hi rend="ital">native</hi> fields. During the siege of Athens by Lysander, <date when-custom="-405">B. C. 405</date>, the Athenian council, in which the oligarchical party had a
      majority, and which had been denounced by Cleophon as a band of traitorous conspirators, were
      instigated by Satyrus to imprison him and bring him to trial on a charge of neglect of
      military duty, which, as Lysias says, was a mere pretext. Before a regular court of justice he
      would doubtless have been acquitted, and one Nicomachus therefore, who had been entrusted with
      a commission to collect the laws of Solon, was suborned by his enemies to fabricate a law for
      the occasion, investing the council with a share in the jurisdiction of the case. This law is
      even said to have been shamelessly produced on the very day of the trial, and Cleophon of
      course was condemned and put to death,--not, however, without opposition from the people,
      since Xenophon speaks of his losing his life in a sedition. (Lys. <hi rend="ital">c.
       Nicom.</hi> p. 184, <hi rend="ital">c. Agor.</hi> p. 130; <bibl n="Xen. Hell. 1.7.35">Xen.
       Hell. 1.7.35</bibl>.) The same year had already witnessed a strong attack on Cleophon by the
      comic poet Plato in the play of that name above alluded to, as well as the notices of him, not
      complimentary, in the "Frogs" of Aristophanes. If we may trust the latter (<hi rend="ital">Thesm.</hi> 805), his private life was as profligate as his public career was mischievous.
      By Isocrates also (<hi rend="ital">de Pac.</hi> p. 174b.) he is classed with Hyperbolus and
      contrasted with the worthies of the good old time, and Andocides mentions it as a disgrace
      that his house was inhabited, during his exile, by Cleophon, the harpmanufacturer. (Andoc. <hi rend="ital">de Myst.</hi> p. 19.) On the other hand, he cannot at any rate be reckoned among
      those who have made a thriving and not over-honest trade of patriotism, for we learn from
      Lysias (<hi rend="ital">de Arist. Bon.</hi> p. 156), that, though he managed the affairs of
      the state for many years, he died at last, to the surprise of all, in poverty. (Comp. Meineke,
       <hi rend="ital">Hist. Crit. Com. Graec.</hi> p. 171 &amp;c.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>