<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.cleitarchus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.cleitarchus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="cleitarchus-bio-1" n="cleitarchus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Cleitarchus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Κλείταρχος</surname></persName>), tyrant of Eretria
      in Euboea. After Plutarchus had been expelled from the tyranny of Eretria by Phocion, <date when-custom="-350">B. C. 350</date>, popular government was at first established ; but strong party
      struggles ensued, in which the adherents of Athens were at length overpowered by those of
      Macedonia, and Philip then sent Hipponicus, one of his generals, to destroy the walls of
      Porthmus, the harbour of Eretria, and to set up Hipparchus, Automedon, and Cleitarchus as
      tyrants. (<bibl n="Plut. Phoc. 13">Plut. Phoc. 13</bibl>; Dem. (<hi rend="ital">de Cor.</hi>
      § 86, <hi rend="ital">Philipp.</hi> 3. §§ 68, 69.) This was subsequent to the
      peace between Athens and Philip in <date when-custom="-346">B. C. 346</date>, since Demosthenes
      adduces it as one of the proofs of a breach of the peace on the part of Macedon. (<hi rend="ital">Philipp.</hi> 3.23.) The tyrants, however, were not suffered to retain their
      power quietly, for Demosthenes (<hi rend="ital">Philip.</hi> 3.69) mentions two armaments sent
      by Philip for their support, at different times, under Eurylochus and Parmenion respectively.
      Soon after, we find Cleitarchus in sole possession of the government ; but he does not seem to
      have been at open hostility with Athens, though he held Eretria for Philip, for we hear of the
      Athenians sending ambassadors to request his consent to the arrangement for uniting Euboea
      under one federative government, having its congress at Chalcis, to which Athens was also to
      transfer the annual contributions from Oreus and Eretria. Aeschines says, that a talent from
      Cleitarchus was part of the bribe which he alleges that Demosthenes received for procuring the
      decree in question. Cleitarchus appears therefore to have come into the above project of
      Demosthenes and Callias, to whom he would naturally be opposed; but he thought it perhaps a
      point gained if he could get rid of the remnant of Atheian influence in Eretria. For the
      possible motives of Demosthenes, see p. 568a. The plan, however, seems to have fallen to the
      ground, and Demosthenes in <date when-custom="-341">B. C. 341</date> carried a decree for an
      expedition to Euboea with the view of putting down the Macedonian interest in the island. On
      this, Cleitarchus and Philistides, the tyrant of Oreus, sent ambassadors to Athens to prevent,
      if possible, the threatened invasion; and Aeschines, at whose house the envoys were
      entertained, appears to have supported their cause in the assembly. But the decree was carried
      into effect, and the command of the armament was given to Phocion, by whom Cleitarchus and
      Philistides were expelled from their respective cities. (Aesch. <hi rend="ital">c. Ctes.</hi>
      §§ 85-103; Dem. <hi rend="ital">de Cor.</hi> p. 252, &amp;c. ; <bibl n="Diod. 16.74">Diod. 16.74</bibl>; Plut. <hi rend="ital">Demi.</hi> 17.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.E.E">E.E</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>