<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.cleanthes_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.cleanthes_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="cleanthes-bio-1" n="cleanthes_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-1269"><surname full="yes">Cleanthes</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Κλεάνθης</label>), a Stoic, born at Assos in Troas about <date when-custom="-300">B. C. 300</date>, though the exact date is unknown. He was the son of Phanias,
      and entered life as a boxer, but had only four drachmas of his own when he felt himself
      impelled to the study of philosophy. He first placed himself under Crates, and then under
      Zeno, whose faithful disciple he continued for nineteen years. In order to support himself and
      pay Zeno the necessary fee for his instructions, he worked all night at drawing water from
      gardens, and in consequence received the nickname of <foreign xml:lang="grc">Φρεάντλης</foreign>. <note anchored="true" place="margin">* Hence the correction of <hi rend="ital">puteum</hi> for <hi rend="ital">pluteum</hi> has been proposed in <bibl n="Juv. 2.7">Juv.
        2.7</bibl> : "Et jubet archetypos <hi rend="ital">pluteum</hi> servare Cleanthas."</note> As
      he spent the whole day in philosophical pursuits, he had no visible means of support, and was
      therefore summoned before the Areiopagus to account for his way of living. The judges were so
      delighted by the evidence of industry which he produced, that they voted him ten minae, though
      Zeno would not permit him to accept them. By his fellow-pupils he was considered slow and
      stupid, and received from them the title of <hi rend="ital">the Ass,</hi> in which appellation
      he said that he rejoiced, as it implied that his back was strong enough to bear whatever Zeno
      put upon it. Several other anecdotes preserved of him shew that he was one of those
      enthusiastic votaries of philosophy who naturally appeared from time to time in an age when
      there was no deep and earnest religion to satisfy the thinking part of mankind. We are not
      therefore surprised to hear of his declaring that for the sake of philosophy he would dig and
      undergo all possible labour, of his taking notes from Zeno's lectures on bones and pieces of
      earthenware when he was too poor to buy paper, and of the quaint penitence with which he
      reviled himself for his small progress in philosophy, by calling himself an old man "possessed
      indeed of grey hairs, but not of a mind." For this vigour and zeal in the pursuit, he was
      styled a second Hercules; and when Zeno died, <date when-custom="-263">B. C. 263</date>, Cleanthes
      succeeded him in his school. This event was fortunate for the preservation of the Stoical
      doctrines, for though Cleanthes was not endowed with the sagacity necessary to rectify and
      develop his master's system, yet his stern morality and his devotion to Zeno induced him to
      keep it free from all foreign corruptions. His poverty was relieved by a present of 3000 minas
      from Antigonus, and he died at the age of eighty. The story of his death is characteristic.
      His physician recommended to him a two days' abstinence from food to cure an ulcer in his
      mouth, and at the end of the second day, he said that, as he had now advanced so far on the
      road to death, it would be a pity to have the trouble over again, and he therefore still
      refused all nourishment, and died of starvation.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>The names of the numerous treatises of Cleanthes preserved by Laertius (7.175) present the
       usual catalogue of moral and philosophical subjects: <foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ
        ἀρετῶν</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ ἡδονῆς</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ θεῶν</foreign>, &amp;c.</p><div><head><title>Hymn to Zeus</title></head><p>A hymn of his to Zeus is still extant, and contains some striking sentiments.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The <title>Hymn to Zeus</title> was published in Greek and German by H. H. Cludius,
          Göttingen, 1786</bibl>; also by <bibl>Sturz, 1785</bibl>, <bibl>re-edited by
          Merzdorf, Lips. 1835</bibl>, and by others.</p></div></div></div><div><head>Doctrines</head><p>His doctrines were almost exactly those of Zeno. There was a slight variation between his
       opinion and the more usual Stoical view respecting the immortality of the soul. Cleanthes
       taught that all souls are immortal, but that the intensity of existence after death would
       vary according to the strength or weakness of the particular soul, thereby leaving to the
       wicked some apprehension of future punishment; whereas Chrysippus considered that only the
       souls of the wise and good were to survive death. (Plut. <hi rend="ital">Place. Phil.</hi>
       4.7.) Again, with regard to the ethical principle of the Stoics, to " live in unison with
       nature," it is said that Zeno only enunciated the vague direction, <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁμολογουμένως ζῇν</foreign>, which Cleanthes explained by the addition of <foreign xml:lang="grc">τῇ φύσει</foreign>. (Stob. <hi rend="ital">Ecl.</hi> ii. p. 132.) By
       this he meant the universal nature of things, whereas Chrysippus understood by the nature
       which we are to follow, the particular nature of man, as well as universal nature. (<bibl n="D. L. 7.89">D. L. 7.89</bibl>.) This opinion of Cleanthes was of a Cynical character [<hi rend="smallcaps">ANTISTHENES</hi>], and held up as a model <pb n="780"/> of an animal state
       of existence, unimproved by the progress of civilization. Accordingly we hear that his moral
       theory was even stricter than that of ordinary Stoicism, denying that pleasure was agreeable
       to nature, or in any way good. The direction to follow universal nature also led to fatalist
       conclusions, of which we find traces in the lines <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἂγου δε μ̓ ὦ
        Ζεῦ</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="grc">και σύ γ̓ ἡ Πεπρωμένη</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὅποι ποθʼ ὑμῖν εἰμὶ διατεταγμένος</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="grc">κ</foreign>. <foreign xml:lang="grc">τ</foreign>. <foreign xml:lang="grc">λ</foreign>.</p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Mohnike, <hi rend="ital">Kleanthes der Stoiker,</hi> fragmn. i.; see also Diog. Laert. <hi rend="ital">l.c.;</hi>
       <bibl n="Cic. Luc. 71">Cic. Ac. 4.23</bibl>, <hi rend="ital">Div.</hi> 1.3, <hi rend="ital">Fin.</hi> 2.21, 4.3; Ritter, <hi rend="ital">Geschichte der Philosophie,</hi> 11.5. 1;
       Brucker, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Crit. Philosoph.</hi> pt. II. lib. 2. c.9.) </p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.G.E.L.C">G.E.L.C</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>