<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.claudius_4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.claudius_4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="claudius-bio-4" n="claudius_4"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Clau'dius</surname></persName></head><p>3. <persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">C.</forename><surname full="yes">Claudius</surname><addName full="yes">App.</addName></persName> F. M. N. <hi rend="smallcaps">SABINUS</hi>
      <hi rend="smallcaps">REGILLENSIS</hi>, brother of the preceding (<bibl n="Dionys. A. R. 10.30">Dionys. A. R. 10.30</bibl> ; <bibl n="Liv. 3.35">Liv. 3.35</bibl>), was consul in <date when-custom="-460">B. C. 460</date>, when Appius Herdonius seized the Capitol. After it had been
      recovered, we find him hindering the execution of the promise made by Valerius respecting the
      Terentilian law. (<bibl n="Liv. 3.15">Liv. 3.15</bibl>_<bibl n="Liv. 3.21">21</bibl>; <bibl n="Dionys. A. R. 10.9">Dionys. A. R. 10.9</bibl>, <bibl n="Dionys. A. R. 10.12">12</bibl>-<bibl n="Dionys. A. R. 10.17">17</bibl>.) Subsequently, he opposed the proposition
      to increase the number of the plebeian tribunes and the law <hi rend="ital">de Aventino
       publicando.</hi> (<bibl n="Dionys. A. R. 10.30">Dionys. A. R. 10.30</bibl>, <bibl n="Dionys. A. R. 10.32">32</bibl>.) He was an unsuccessful candidate for the dictatorship.
       (<bibl n="Liv. 3.35">Liv. 3.35</bibl>.) Though a staunch supporter of the aristocracy, he
      warned his brother against an immoderate use of his power. (<bibl n="Liv. 3.40">Liv.
       3.40</bibl>; <bibl n="Dionys. A. R. 11.7">Dionys. A. R. 11.7</bibl>-<bibl n="Dionys. A. R. 11.11">11</bibl>.) His remonstrances being of no avail, he withdrew to
      Regillum, but returned to defend the decemvir Appius, when impeached. (<bibl n="Liv. 3.58">Liv. 3.58</bibl>.) Incensed at his death, he strove to revenge himself on the consuls
      Horatius and Valerius by opposing their application for leave to triumph. (<bibl n="Dionys. A. R. 11.49">Dionys. A. R. 11.49</bibl>.) In 445 we find him strenuously opposing
      the law of Canuleius, and proposing to arm the consuls against the tribunes. (<bibl n="Liv. 4.6">Liv. 4.6</bibl>.) According to Dionysius, however (11.55, 56), he himself
      proposed the election of military tribunes with consular power from both plebeians and
      patricians.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>