<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.charidemus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.charidemus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="charidemus-bio-1" n="charidemus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Charide'mus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Χαρίδημος</surname></persName>).</p><p>1. Of Euboea, son of a woman of Oreus by an obscure father, if we may believe the account of
      Demosthenes in a speech filled with invective against him. (Dem. <hi rend="ital">c.
       Aristocr.</hi> p. 691.) On the same authority, we learn that he began his military career as
      a slinger among the light-armed, that he then became commander of a pirate vessel, and finally
      the captain of a mercenary band of " free companions." (Dem. <hi rend="ital">c. Aristocr.</hi>
      pp. 668, 669.) In this capacity he first entered the Athenian service under Iphicrates, who
      had been sent against Amphipolis, about <date when-custom="-367">B. C. 367</date>. At the end of
      somewhat more than three years, Amphipolis agreed to surrender to the Athenians and delivered
      hostages to Iphicrates for the performance of the promise: these, on being superseded by
      Timotheus, he entrusted to Charidemus, who restored them to the Amphipolitans in spite of the
      decree of the Athenian people requiring them to be sent to Athens, and then passed over to
      Cotys, king of Thrace, who was hostile to the Athenians at the time. In <date when-custom="-360">B.
       C. 360</date>, when Timotheus was meditating his attack on Amphipolis, Charidermus was
      engaged to enter the service of the Olynthians, who were preparing to defend it; but, on his
      passage from Cardia in the Chersonesus, he was captured by the Athenians, and consented to aid
      them against Olynthus. After the failure of Timotheus at Amphipolis in the same year,
      Charidemus crossed over to Asia and entered the service of Memnon and Mentor, brothers-in-law
      of Artabazus, who had been imprisoned by Autophradates, but whose cause they still maintained.
       [<hi rend="smallcaps">ARTABAZUS</hi>, No. 4.] He deceived his employers, however, and seized
      the towns of Scepsis, Cebren, and Ilium; but, being closely pressed by Artabazus after his
      release from prison, he applied to the Athenians to interpose in his behalf, promising to help
      them in recovering the Chersonesus. Artabazus, however, allowed him to depart uninjured, by
      the advise of Sielnnon and Melltor, <pb n="685"/> before the arrival of the Athenian squadron
      destined for the Hellespont under Cephisodotus; and Charidemus, on his return to Europe, in
      spite of his promise, lent his services to Cotys, whose daughter he married, and laid siege to
      Crithote and Elaeus. (Dem. c. <hi rend="ital">Aristocr.</hi> pp. 669-674.) On the murder of
      Cotys, <date when-custom="-358">B. C. 358</date>, he adhered to the cause of Cersobleptes, on whose
      behalf he conducted the struggle with the Athenians, both by war and diplomacy, for the
      possession of the Chersonesus. He compelled Cephisodotus to submit, with respect to it, to a
      compromise most unfavorable to his country; and though Athenodorus (uniting with Amadocus and
      Berisades, and taking advantage of the national indignation excited by the murder of
      Miltocythes, which Charidemus had procured from the Cardians) obliged Cersobleptes to consent
      to a threefold division of the kingdom, and to the surrender of the Chersonesus to
      Athens,--yet, on the arrival of Chabrias with only one ship, the crafty Euboean again
      renounced the treaty, and drove the Atherian general to accept another still more unfavourable
      to Athens than that of Cephisodotus. But this was repudiated by the Athenians; and, at length,
      after much fruitless negotiation, Chares having arrived in the Hellespont with a sufficient
      force and with the authority of commander <hi rend="ital">autocrator,</hi> Charidemus
      consented to ratify the treaty of Athenodorus, still, however, contriving to retain the town
      of Cardia; and his partizans among the orators at Athens having persuaded the people that they
      owed to him the cession of the Chersonesus (a strange delusion, if the narrative of events in
      Demosthenes may be depended on), they rewarded his supposed services with the franchise of the
      city and a golden crown. (Dem. <hi rend="ital">c. Aristocr.</hi> pp. 650, 674-682; Arist. <hi rend="ital">Rhet.</hi> 2.23.17; comp. Isocr. <hi rend="ital">de Pac.</hi> p. 169c.) This
      appears to have been in <date when-custom="-357">B. C. 357</date>. In <date when-custom="-352">B. C.
       352</date>, hoping perhaps to recover Amphipolis through his aid, they passed a decree in
      spite of the opposition of Demosthenes and his party (<hi rend="ital">c. Aristocr.
       paisssim</hi>), pronouncing the person of Charidemus inviolable, and rendering any one who
      should kill him amenable to justice from any part of the Athenian empire. [<hi rend="smallcaps">CERSOBLEPTES.</hi>] In <date when-custom="-349">B. C. 349</date>, after the recall
      of Chares, Charidemus was appointed by the Athenians as commander in the Olynthian war. In
      conjunction with the Olynthians, he ravaged Pallene and Bottiaea, which seem to have been then
      in the hands of Philip; but he caused much offence by his insolent and profligate conduct at
      Olynthus, and in the ensuing year he was superseded and replaced by Chares. (Philochor. apud
       <hi rend="ital">Dionys.</hi> p. 735; Theopomp. apud <hi rend="ital">Athen.</hi> x. p. 436c.)
      Henceforth he disappears from history, though he has been identified by some with the
      Charidemus mentioned immediately below, in opposition, we think, to internal evidence.
      (Mitford's <hi rend="ital">Greece,</hi> ch. 48, sec. 1; Thirlwall's <hi rend="ital">Greece,</hi> vol. v. p. 192, note 4, vol. vi. p. 101.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>