<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.canachus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.canachus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="canachus-bio-1" n="canachus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Ca'nachus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Κάναχος</surname></persName>).</p><p>1. A Sicyonian artist, about whose age the greatest uncertainty long prevailed, as one work
      of his is mentioned which must have been executed before Ol. 75, and another 80 years later,
      which seems to be, and indeed is, impossible. The fact is, that there were two artists of the
      name of Canachus, both of Sicyon, and probably grandfather and grandson. This was first
      suggested by Schorn (<hi rend="ital">Ueb. d. Stud. d. Griech. Künstler,</hi> p. 199) and
      adopted by Thiersch (<hi rend="ital">Epoch.</hi> Anm. pp. 38-44), K. O. Müller, and
      Böckh. The work which must have been finished <date when-custom="-480">B. C. 480</date>, was a
      colossal statue of Apollo Philesius at Miletus, this statue having been carried to Ecbatana by
      Xerxes after his defeat in Greece, <date when-custom="-479">B. C. 479</date>. Müller (<hi rend="ital">Kunstblatt,</hi> 1821, N. 16) thinks, that this statue cannot have been executed
      before <date when-custom="-494">B. C. 494</date>, at which time Miletus was destroyed and burnt by
      Dareius; but Thiersch (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>) shews that the colossus might very well have
      escaped the general ruin, and therefore needs not have been placed there after the destruction
      of the city. Finding that all indications point to the interval between O1. 60 and 68 (<date when-custom="-540">B. C. 540</date>-<date when-custom="-508">508</date>), he has given these 32 years as
      the time during which Canachus flourished. Thus the age of our artist coincides with that of
      Callon, whose contemporary he is called by Pausanias (<bibl n="Paus. 7.18.6">7.18.6</bibl>).
      He was likewise contemporary with Ageladas, who flourished about O1. 66 [<hi rend="smallcaps">AGELADAS</hi>]; for, together with this artist and with his own brother, Aristocles, he
      executed three Muses, who symbolically represented the diatonic, chromatic, and enharmonic
      styles of Greek music. Besides these works, we find the following mentioned: Riding (<foreign xml:lang="grc">κελητίζοντες</foreign>) boys (<bibl n="Plin. Nat. 34.8.19">Plin. Nat. 34.8.
       s. 19</bibl>); a statue of Aphrodite, wrought in gold and ivory (<bibl n="Paus. 2.10.4">Paus.
       2.10.4</bibl>); one of Apollo Ismenius at Thebes, made of cedar, and so very like the Apollo
      Philesins of Miletus, which was of metal, that one could instantly recognize the artist.
      (Paus. <hi rend="ital">l.c.,</hi> 9.10.2.) For Cicero's judgment of Canachus's performances,
      see <hi rend="smallcaps">CALAMIS.</hi></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>