<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.camerinus_11</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.camerinus_11</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="camerinus-bio-11" n="camerinus_11"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Cameri'nus</surname></persName></head><p>10. <persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Sulpicius</surname><addName full="yes">Camerinus</addName></persName>, was proconsul of Africa together with Pomponius
      Silvanus, and on their return to Rome in <date when-custom="59">A. D. 59</date>, they were both
      accused on account of their extortions in their province, but were acquitted by the emperor
      Nero. (<bibl n="Tac. Ann. 13.52">Tac. Ann. 13.52</bibl>.) Soon afterwards, however, Nero put
      Camerinus and his son to death, according to Dio Cassius (63.18), for no other reason but
      because they ventured to make use of the surname Pythicus, which was hereditary in their
      family, and which Nero claimed as an exclusive prerogative for himself. It appears from Pliny
       (<bibl n="Plin. Ep. 5.3">Plin. Ep. 5.3</bibl>), that they were accused by M. Regulus.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>