<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.callippus_9</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.callippus_9</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="callippus-bio-9" n="callippus_9"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Callippus</surname></persName></head><p>or CALIPPUS (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Κάλλιππος</foreign> or <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κάλιππος</foreign>), an astronomer of Cyzicus. He was a disciple of one of Eudoxus'
      friends, and followed him to Athens, where he became acquainted <pb n="575"/> with Aristotle
      (who mentions him <hi rend="ital">Metaph.</hi> 11.8), and assisted that philosopher in
      rectifying and completing the discoveries of Eudoxus. (Simplic. <hi rend="ital">in lib. II. de
       Coel</hi> p. 120a.) His observations are frequently referred to by Geminus and Ptolemy in
      their meteorological calendars (see Geminus, <hi rend="ital">Elem. Astron.</hi> cap. 16, in
      Petav. <hi rend="ital">Uranolog.</hi> p. 64, &amp;c. and Ptol <foreign xml:lang="grc">φάσεις ἀπλανῶν ἀστέρων καὶ συναγωγὴ ἐπισημασιῶν</foreign>, ibid. p. 71, &amp;c.),
      and were probably made at Cyzicus, since Ptolemy (ad fin.) says, that Callippus observed at
      the Hellespont. Such calendars were fixed in public places, for common use, and hence called
       <foreign xml:lang="grc">παραπήγματα</foreign>: they record the times of the different
      risings and settings of the fixed stars, with the <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπισημασίαι</foreign>, or principal changes in the weather supposed to be connected with
      them, as deduced from the observations of various astronomers. Callippus invented the period
      or cycle of 76 years, called after him the <hi rend="ital">Callippic.</hi> Several attempts
      had been previously made to discover intervals of time of moderate length, which should be
      expressible in whole numbers by means of each of the three natural units of time--the solar
      year, the lunar month, and the solar day: and, in particular, Meton, about a century before,
      had observed the remarkable approximation to equality between 19 years and 235 months, and had
      introduced the celebrated cycle of 19 years, which he also assumed to contain 6940 days. This
      would make the year = 365 5/19 days; and, therefore, Callippus, observing that the difference
      between this and the more correct value 365 1/4 was 5/19 - 5/20 = 1/4 x 19 = 1/76, proposed to
      quadruple the Metonic period, and then subtract one day. He supposed, that 76 years = 940
      months = 27759 days; both of which suppositions are considerably nearer the truth than
      Meton's. (Geminus, <hi rend="ital">El. Ast.</hi> cap. 6, <hi rend="ital">Uranolog.</hi> p.
      37.) If we take the mean values of the year and month, in days, to be 365.2422414 and
      29.5305887215 respectively, then 76 years =27758<hi rend="super">d</hi> 9<hi rend="super">h</hi> 50<hi rend="super">m</hi> 54<hi rend="super">s</hi>, and 940 months = 27758<hi rend="super">d</hi> 18<hi rend="super">h</hi> 4<hi rend="super">m</hi> 54<hi rend="super">s</hi> nearly; but these numbers would not be strictly accurate in the time of
      Callippus.</p><p>The Callippic period seems to have been generally adopted by astronomers in assigning the
      dates of their observations; and the frequent use which Ptolemy makes of it enables us to fix
      the epoch of the beginning of the first period with considerable certainty. It must have begun
      near the time of the summer solstice, since Ptolemy refers to an observation of that solstice
      made at the end of the 50th year (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τῷν́ ἕτελ λήγοντι</foreign>)
      of the first period (<foreign xml:lang="grc">μεγ. σύνταξ</foreign>. 3.2, vol. i. p. 163,
      ed. Halma); and out of a number of other observations recorded by the same writer, all but
      two, according to Ideler, indicate the year <date when-custom="-330">B. C. 330</date>, whilst four
      of them require the evening of June 28 for the epoch in question. It is not certain at what
      time the period came into civil use; it would naturally be employed not to supersede, but to
      correct from time to time, the Metonic reckoning. The inaccuracy of the latter must have
      become quite sensible in <date when-custom="-330">B. C. 330</date>; and it is evident, from the
      praise which Diodorus (<bibl n="Diod. 12.36">12.36</bibl>) bestows upon it, that it could not
      have remained uncorrected down to his time. (Ideler, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Untersuch.
       über die Astron. Beobachtungen der Alten,</hi> Berlin, 1806, p. 214, &amp;c., <hi rend="ital">Handbuch der Technischen Chronologie,</hi> Berlin, 1825, vol. i. p. 344, &amp;c.;
      Petavius, <hi rend="ital">Doctrin. Temp.</hi> 2.16; Scaliger, <hi rend="ital">De Emend.
       Temp.</hi> lib. ii.; Delambre, <hi rend="ital">Hist. de l'Astron. Ancienne,</hi> vol. i. p.
      200.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.W.F.D">W.F.D</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>