<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.calliopius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.calliopius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="calliopius-bio-1" n="calliopius_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Callio'pius</surname></persName></head><p>In all, or almost all, the MSS. of Terence, known not to be older than the ninth century, we
      find at the end of each play the words " Calliopius recensui," from whence it has very
      naturally been inferred, that Calliopius was some grammarian of reputation, who had revised
      and corrected the text of the dramatist. Eugraphius, indeed, who wrote a commentary upon the
      same comedian about the year <date when-custom="1000">A. D. 1000</date>, has the following note on
      the word <hi rend="ital">plaudite</hi> at the end of the Andria: " Verba sunt Calliopii ejus
      recitatoris, qui, cum fabulam terminissct elevabat aulaeum sceiiae, et alloqucebatur populum,
       <hi rend="ital">Vos valete, Vos plaudite sive favete(;</hi>" but this notion is altogether
      inconsistent with the established meaning of <foreign xml:lang="la">recensui.</foreign>
      <pb n="574"/> Barth, on the other hand, maintained, that Calliopius was a complimentary
      epithet, indicating the celebrated Flaccus Albinus or Alcuinus, whom in a MS. life of
      Willebrord he found designated as "Dominus Albinus magister optimus Calliopicus," <hi rend="ital">i.e.</hi>
      <foreign xml:lang="la">totus a Calliope et Musis formatus</foreign>; but the probability of
      this conjecture has been much weakened by Fabricius, who has shewn that Calliopius was a
      proper name not uncommon among writers of the middle ages. (Funocius, <hi rend="ital">de
       Inerti ac Decrepita Linguae Latinae Senectute,</hi> c. 4. § xxxii.; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Lat.</hi> lib. i. c. 3. §§ 3 and 4; Eust. Swartii <hi rend="ital">Analecta,</hi> 3.11, p. 132; Barth. <hi rend="ital">Advers.</hi> 6.20; Ritschl, <hi rend="ital">De emendat. Fab. Terentt, disput.,</hi> Wratislav. 4to. 1838.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>