<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.callimachus_5</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.callimachus_5</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="callimachus-bio-5" n="callimachus_5"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Calli'machus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Καλλίμαχος</surname></persName>), an artist of
      uncertain country, who is said to have invented the Corinthian column. (<bibl n="Vitr. 4.1.10">Vitr. 4.1.10</bibl>.) As Scopas built a temple of Athene at Tegea with Corinthian columns in
       <date when-custom="-396">B. C. 396</date>, Callimachus must have lived before that time. Pausanias
       (<bibl n="Paus. 1.26.7">1.26.7</bibl>) calls him the inventor of the art of boring marble
       (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τοὺς λίθους τρῶτος ἐτρύπησε</foreign>), which Thiersch (<hi rend="ital">Epoch.</hi> Anm. p. 60) thinks is to be understood of a mere perfection of that
      art, which could not have been entirely unknown to so late a period. By these inventions as
      well as by his other productions, Callimachus stood in good reputation with his
      contemporaries, although he did not belong to the first-rate artists. He was so anxious to
      give his works tilt last touch of perfection, by elaborating the details with too much care,
      that he lost the grand and sublime. Dionysius therefore compares him and Calamis to the orator
      Lysias (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τῆς λεπτότητος ἕνεκα καὶ τῆς χάριτος</foreign>),
      whilst he draws a parallel between Polycletus and Phidias and Isocrates, on account of the
       <foreign xml:lang="grc">σεμνὸν καὶ μεγαλότεχνον καὶ ἀξιωματικόν</foreign> (<hi rend="ital">Jiudic. Isocr.</hi> 100.3.) Callimachus was never satisfied with himself. and
      therefore received the epithet <foreign xml:lang="grc">κακιζότεχνος</foreign>. (<bibl n="Paus. 1.26.7">Paus. 1.26.7</bibl>.) Pliny (<bibl n="Plin. Nat. 34.8.19">Plin. Nat. 34.8.
       s. 19</bibl>) says the same, and gives an exact interpretation of the suriame: " Semper
      calummiator sui nec finem habens diligentiae; ob id <foreign xml:lang="grc">κακιζότεχνος</foreign> appellatus." Vitruvius says, that Callimachus "propter elegantiam et
      subtilitatem artis marmoreae ab Atheniensibus <foreign xml:lang="grc">κατάτεχνος</foreign>
      fuerat nominatus." Sillig (<hi rend="ital">Cat. Art.</hi> p. 125) conjectures, after some
      MMS., that <foreign xml:lang="grc">κατατηξίτεχνος</foreign> must be read instead of
       <foreign xml:lang="grc">κακιξότεχνος</foreign>; but this is quite improbable on account of
      Pliny's translation, "calumniator sui." Whether the <foreign xml:lang="grc">κατάτεχνος</foreign> of Vitruvius is corrupt or a second surname (as Siebelis supposes, <hi rend="ital">ad Paus.</hi> 1.26.7), cannot be decided. So much is certain, that Callimachus'
      style was too artificial. Pliny (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>), speaking of a work representing
      some dancing Lacedaemonian women, says, that his excessive. elaboration of the work had
      destroyed all its beauty. Pausanias (<bibl n="Paus. 1.26">1.26</bibl> § 7) describes a
      golden lamp, a work of Callimachus dedicated to Athene, which if filled with oil, burnt
      precisely one whole year without ever going out. It is scarcely probable that the painter
      Callimachus, mentioned by Pliny (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>), should be our statuary, although
      he is generally identified with him. </p><byline>[<ref target="author.W.I">W.I</ref>]</byline><pb n="573"/></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>