<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.c_cornelius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.c_cornelius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="c-cornelius-bio-1" n="c_cornelius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">C.</forename><surname full="yes">Corne'lius</surname></persName></label></head><p>of a plebeian branch of the Cornelia gens, was quaestor of Pompey the Great. In the year
       <date when-custom="-67">B. C. 67</date>, he was tribune of the plebs, and proposed a law in the
      senate to prevent the lending of money to foreign ambassadors at Rome. The proposition was not
      carried, since many of the senators derived profit from the practice, which had led to
      shameful abuses by the bribery and extortions which it covered. He then proposed that no
      person should be released from the obligations of a law except by the populus. The senate had
      of late exercised a power, analogous to that of the British Parliament in passing private
      acts, which exempt individuals in certain cases from the general provisions of the law. This
      power the senate was unwilling to be deprived of, and the tribune Servilius Glolbulus, a
      colleague of Cornelius, was persuaded to interpose, and prohibit the reading of the rotation
      by the clerk. Cornelius thereupon read it himself, and a tumult followed. Cornelius took no
      part in the riot, and evinced his moderation by being content with a law, which made the
      presence of 200 senators requisite to the validity of a dispensing senatusconsultum. When his
      year of office was ended, he was accused of majestas by P. Cominius, for reading the rogation
      in defiance of the intercession of Globulus; the accusation was dropped this year, but renewed
      in <date when-custom="-65">B. C. 65</date>. Cornelius was ably defended by Cicero (part of whose
      speech is extant), and was acquitted by a majority of votes. [<hi rend="smallcaps">COMINIUS</hi>, Nos. 5 and 6.]</p><p>In his tribuneship, he was the successful proposer of a law, of which the importance can
      scarcely be over-rated. In order to check the partiality of occasional edicts, it was enacted
      by the lex Cornelia " ut praetores ex edictis suis perpetuis jus dicerent." (<hi rend="ital">Dict. of Ant. s. v. Edictum.</hi>)</p><p>Cornelius was a man of blameless private life, and, in his public character, though he was
      accused of factiousness by the nobles, seems to have advocated usful measures. (Asconius, <hi rend="ital">in Cic. pro Cornel. ;</hi>
      <bibl n="D. C. 36.21">D. C. 36.21</bibl>, <bibl n="D. C. 36.23">23</bibl>; Drumann's <hi rend="ital">Gesch. Roms,</hi> ii. p. 613.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.J.T.G">J.T.G</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>