<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:B.boethius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:B.boethius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="B"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="boethius-bio-1" n="boethius_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Boe'thius</surname></persName></head><p>whose full name was <hi rend="smallcaps">ANICIUS</hi>
      <hi rend="smallcaps">MANLIUS</hi>
      <hi rend="smallcaps">SEVERINUS</hi>
      <hi rend="smallcaps">BOETHIUS</hi> (to which a few MSS. of his works add the name of <hi rend="ital">Torquatus,</hi> and commentators prefix by conjecture the praenomen <hi rend="ital">Flavius</hi> from his father's consulship in <date when-custom="487">A. D. 487</date>),
      a Roman statesman and author, and remarkable as standing at the close of the classical and the
      commencement of scholastic philosophy. He was born between <date when-custom="470">A. D. 470</date>
      and 475 (as is inferred from <hi rend="ital">Consol. Phil.</hi> 1.1). The Anician family had
      for the two preceding centuries been the most illustrious in Rome (see Gibbon, 100.31), and
      several of its members have been reckoned amongst the direct ancestors of Boethius. But the
      only conjecture worth notice is that which makes his grandfather to have been the Flavius
      Boethius murdered by Valentinian III. <date when-custom="455">A. D. 455</date>. His father was
      probably the consul of <date when-custom="487">A. D. 487</date>, and died in the childhood of his
      son, who was then brought up by some of the chief men at Rome, amongst whom were probably
      Festus and Symmachus. (<hi rend="ital">Consol. Phil.</hi> 2.3.)</p><p>He was famous for his general learning (Ennodius, <hi rend="ital">Ep.</hi> 8.1) and his
      laborious translations of Greek philosophy (Cassiodor. <hi rend="ital">Ep.</hi> 1.45) as well
      as for his extensive charities to the poor at Rome, both natives and strangers. (Procop. <hi rend="ital">Goth.</hi> 1.1.) In his domestic life, he was singularly happy, as the husband of
      Rusticiana, daughter of Symmachus (<hi rend="ital">Consol. Phil.</hi> 2.3, 4; Procop. <hi rend="ital">Goth.</hi> 3.20), and the father of two sons, Aurelius Anicius Symmachus, and
      Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius, who were consuls, <date when-custom="522">A. D. 522</date>. (<hi rend="ital">Consol. Phil.</hi> 2.3, 4.) He naturally rose into public notice, became
      patrician before the usual age (<hi rend="ital">Consol. Phil.</hi> 2.3), consul in <date when-custom="510">A. D. 510</date>, as appears from the diptychon of his consulship still preserved
      in Brescia (See Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Lat.</hi> 3.15), and princeps senatus. (Procop.
       <hi rend="ital">Goth.</hi> 1.1.) He also attracted the attention of Theodoric, king of the
      Ostrogoths, was appointed (Anonym. Vales. p. 36) magister officiorum in his court, and was
      applied to by him for a mathematical regulation of the coinage to prevent forgery (Cassiod.
       <hi rend="ital">Ep.</hi> 1.10), for a sun-dial and waterclock for Gundebald, king of the
      Burgundians (<hi rend="ital">ib.</hi> 1.45), and for the recommendation of a good musician to
      Clovis, king of the Franks. (<hi rend="ital">Ib.</hi> 2.40.) And he reached the height of his
      prosperity when, on the inauguration of his two sons in the consulate, <date when-custom="522">A. D.
       522</date>, after pronouncing a panegyric on Theodoric, he distributed a largess to the Roman
      populace in the games of the circus. (<hi rend="ital">Consol. Phil.</hi> 2.3.)</p><p>This happiness was suddenly overcast. He had resolved, on his entrance into public life, to
      carry out the saying of Plato, "that the world would only be happy when kings became
      philosophers, or philosophers became kings." He protected and relieved the provincials from
      the public and private rapine to which they were exposed, defended the Campanians against the
      praefect of the praetorium, saved Paulinus from "the dogs of the palace," and restrained the
      oppressions of the barbarian officers, Triguilla and Conigastus. (<hi rend="ital">Consol.
       Phil.</hi> 1.4.) This unflinching integrity naturally provoked enmity in the court of
      Theodoric; and the boldness with which he pleaded the cause of Albinus, when accused of
      treason by the informer Cyprianus, seems to have been the plea on which Gaudentius, Opilio,
      and Basilius charged him and Symmachus with the intention of delivering Rome from the
      barbarian yoke,--to which was added the charge of sacrilege or magic. A sentence of
      confiscation and death was passed against him unheard (<hi rend="ital">Consol. Phil.</hi>
      1.4), and he was imprisoned at Ticinum in the baptistry of the church, which was to be seen at
      Pavia till 1584 (Tiraboschi, vol. iii. lib. 1. c.4), during which time he wrote his book
       <title xml:lang="la">De Consolatione Philosophiae</title>. He was executed at Calvenzano (in
      agro Calventiano) (Anonym. Vales. p. 36), or according to the general belief, at Ticinum, by
      beheading (Anast. <hi rend="ital">Vit. Pontif. in Joanne I.;</hi> Aimoin. <hi rend="ital">Hist. Franc.</hi> 2.1), or (according to Anonym. Vales. p. 36) by the torture of a cord
      drawn round his head till the eyes were forced from their sockets, and then by beating with
      clubs till he expired. Symmachus was also beheaded, and Rusticiana reduced to poverty, till
      Amalasontha, widow of Theodoric and regent during her son's minority, replaced his statues and
      restored to her his confiscated property. (Procop. <hi rend="ital">Goth.</hi> 1.2, <hi rend="ital">Anec.</hi> 10; Jornand. <hi rend="ital">Reb. Get.</hi> 89.) Rusticiana was,
      however, on the sack of Rome, in <date when-custom="541">A. D. 541</date>, chiefly by her liberality
      to the besieged, again reduced to beggary, and was only saved by the kindness of Totila from
      the fury which this liberality, as well as her destruction of Theodoric's statues in revenge
      for her husband and father, had excited in the Gothic army. (Procop. <hi rend="ital">Goth.</hi> 3.20.) In <date when-custom="722">A. D. 722</date>, a tomb was erected to Boethius's
      memory by Luitprand, king of the Lombards, in the church of S. Pietro Cielo d'Oro, and in A.
      D. 990, a more magnificent one by Otho III., with an epitaph by pope Sylvester II.
      (Tiraboschi, vol. iii. lib. 1. c.4.)</p><div><head>Other Stories of Boethius' Life</head><p>With the facts stated above have been mixed up various stories, more or less disputed,
       which seem to have grown with the growth of his posthumous reputation.</p><div><head>1. Stay at Athens and attendance on the lecture of Proclus</head><p>The story of his eighteen years' stay at Athens, and attendance on the lectures of
        Proclus, rests only on the authority of the spurious treatise <title xml:lang="la">De
         Disciplina Scholarium</title>, proved by Thonmasius to have been written by Thomas
        Brabantinus, or Cantipratinus. The sentence of Cassiodorus (i 45) <pb n="496"/> inaccurately
        quoted by Gibbon (" Atheniensium scholas [not Athenas] longer posits [not posits]
        introisti") as a proof of his visit to Athens, is really a statement of the reverse, being a
        rhetorical assertion of the fact, that though living at Rome, he was well acquainted with
        the philosophy of Greece. Compare the similar expressions in the same letter: "<hi rend="ital">Plato ... Aristoteles ... Quirinali voce disceptant.</hi>"</p></div><div><head>2. Three Consulships</head><p>The three consulships sometimes ascribed to him are made up from that of his father in
        487, and that of his sons in 522.</p></div><div><head>3. Previously husband of Elpis</head><p>Besides his wife, Rusticiana, later and especially Sicilian writers have supposed, that he
        was previously the husband of a Sicilian lady, Elpis, authoress of two hymns used in the
        Breviary (" Decora lux," and " Beate Pastor," or according to others, " Aurea luce," and
        "Felix per omnes"), and by her to have had two sons, Patricius and Hypatius, Greek consuls
        in <date when-custom="500">A. D. 500</date>. But this has no ground in history: the expression "
        socerorum," in <hi rend="ital">Consol. Phil.</hi> 2.3, refers not to two fathers-in-law, but
        to the parents of Rusticiana; and the epitaph of Elpis, which is the only authentic record
        of her life, contradicts the story altogether, by implying that she followed her husband
        (who is not named) into exile, which would of course leave no time for his second marriage
        and children. (See Tiraboschi, vol. iii. lib. 1. c.4.)</p></div><div><head>4. Death and the Embassy of Pope John I. to Constantinople</head><p>Paulus Diaconus (book vii.), Anastasius (<hi rend="ital">Vit. Pontif. in Joanne</hi> I.),
        and later writers, have connected his death with the embassy of pope John I. to
        Constantinople for the protection of the Catholics, in which he is alleged to have been
        implicated. But this story, not being alluded to in the earlier accounts, appears to have
        arisen, like the last-mentioned one, from the desire to connect his name more distinctly
        with Christianity, which leads to the last and most signal variation in his history.</p></div><div><head>5. Considered a Catholic Saint and Martyr</head><p>He was long considered as a Catholic saint and martyr, and in later times stories were
        current of his having been a friend of St. Benedict, and having supped at Monte Cassino
        (Trithemius, apud <hi rend="ital">Fabric. Bibl. Lat.</hi> 3.15), and again of miracles at
        his death, as carrying his head in his hand (Life of him by Martianus, apud <hi rend="ital">Baron. Annual.</hi>
        <date when-custom="526">A. D. 526</date>, No. 17, 18), which last indeed probably arose from the
        fact of this being the symbolical representation of martyrdom by decapitation; as the
        particular day of his death (Oct. 23) was probably fixed by its being the day of two other
        saints of the same name of Severinus.</p><p>Whatever may be thought of these details, the question of his Christianity itself is beset
        with difficulties in whichever way it may be determined. On the one hand, if the works on
        dogmatical theology ascribed to him be really his, the question is settled in the
        affirmative. But, in that case, the total omission of all mention of Christianity in the
        "Consolatio Philosophiae," in passages and under circumstances where its mention seemed to
        be imperatively demanded, becomes so great a perplexity that various expedients have been
        adopted to solve it. Bertius conjectured, that there was to have been a sixth book, which
        was interrupted by his death. Glareanus, though partly on other grounds, with the
        independent judgment for which he is commended by Niebuhr, rejected the work itself as
        spurious. Finally, Professor Hand, in Ersch and Gruber's <hi rend="ital">Encyclophädie,</hi> has with much ingenuity maintained the opposite hypothesis, viz.
        that Boethius was not a Christian at all, and that the theological works ascribed to him
        were written by another Boethius, who was afterwards confounded with him; and hence the
        origin or confirmation of the mistake.</p><p>In favour of this theory may be mentioned, over and above the general argument arising
        from the <hi rend="ital">Consolatio Phlosophiae,</hi> (1.) The number of persons of the name
        of Boethius in or about that time. See Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Lat.</hi> 3.15. (2.)
        The tendency of that age to confound persons of inferior note with their more famous
        namesakes, as well as to publish anonymous works under celebrated names; as, for example,
        the ascription to St. Athanasius of the hymn <title xml:lang="la">Quicunque vult</title>, or
        to St. Dionysius the Areopagite, of the works which go under his name. (3.) The evidently
        fabulous character of all the <hi rend="ital">events</hi> in his life alleged to prove his
        Christianity. (4.) The tendency which appears increasingly onwards through the middle ages
        to Christianize eminent heathens; as, for example, the embodiment of such traditions with
        regard to Trajan, Virgil, and Statius, in the Divina Comedia of Dante. Still sufficient
        difficulties remain to prevent an implicit acquiescence in this hypothesis. Though no author
        quotes the theological works of Boethius before Hincmar (A. D. 850), yet there is no trace
        of any doubt as to their genuineness; and also, though the general tone of the Consolatio is
        heathen, a few phrases seem to savour of a belief in Christianity, <hi rend="ital">e. g.
         angelica virtute</hi> (4.5), <hi rend="ital">patriam</hi> for "heaven" (5.1, 4.1), <hi rend="ital">veri praevia luminis</hi> (4.1).</p></div></div><div><head>Assessment</head><p>After all, however the critical question be settled, the character of Boethius is not much
       affected by it. For as it must be determined almost entirely from the " Consolatio," in which
       he speaks with his whole heart, and not from the abstract statements of doctrine in the
       theological treatises, which, even if genuine, are chiefly compiled with hardly an expression
       of personal feeling, from the works of St. Augustin, on the one hand the general silence on
       the subject of Christianity in such a book at such a period of his life, proves that, if he
       was a Christian, its doctrines could hardly have been a part of his living belief; on the
       other hand, the incidental phrases above quoted, the strong religious <hi rend="ital">theism</hi> which pervades the whole work, the real belief which it indicates in prayer and
       Providence, and the unusually high tone of his public life, prove that, if a heathen, his
       general character must have been deeply tinged by the contemporaneous influence of
       Christianity.</p><p>He would thus seem to have been one of a probably large class of men, such as will always
       be found in epochs between the fall of one system of belief and the rise of another, and who
       by hovering on the confines of each can hardly be assigned exclusively to either,--one who,
       like Epictetus and the Antonines, and, nearer his own time, the poet Claudian and the
       historian Zosimus, was by his deep attachment to the institutions and literature of Greece
       and Rome led to look for practical support to a heathen or half-heathen philosophy; whilst
       like them, but in a greater degree, his religious and moral views received an elevation from
       their contact with the now established faith of Christianity.</p><p>The middle position which he thus occupied by his personal character and belief, he also
       occupies in the general history and literature of the world. <pb n="497"/> Being the last
       Roman of any note who understood the language and studied the literature of Greece, and
       living on the boundary of the ancient and modern world, he is one of the most important links
       between them. As it had been the great object of his public life to protect the declining
       fortunes of Rome against the oppression of the barbarian invaders, so it was the great object
       of his literary life to keep alive the expiring light of Greek literature amidst the growing
       ignorance of the age. The complete ruin of the ancient world, which followed almost
       immediately on his death, imparted to this object an importance and to himself a celebrity
       far beyond what he could ever have anticipated. In the total ignorance of Greek writers which
       prevailed from the 6th to the 14th century, he was looked upon as the head and type of all
       philosophers, as Augustin was of all theology and Virgil of all literature, and hence the
       tendency throughout the middle ages to invest him with a distinctly Christian and almost
       miraculous character. In Dante,<hi rend="ital">e.g.</hi> he is thus described (<hi rend="ital">Parad.</hi> 10.124):-- <quote rend="blockquote" xml:lang="it"><l>Per veder ogni
         ben dentro vi gode</l><l>L' anima santa, che '1 mondo fallace</l><l>Fa manifesto a chi di lei ben ode ;</l><l>Lo corpo, ond 'ella fu cacciata, giace</l><l>Giuso in Cieldauro, ed essa da martiro</l><l>E da esiglio venne a questa pace.</l></quote></p></div><div><head>Importance of the Consolatio</head><p>After the introduction of the works of Aristotle into Europe in the 13th century,
       Boethius's fame gradually died away, and he affords a remarkable instance of an author, who
       having served a great purpose for nearly 1000 years, now that that purpose has been
       accomplished, will sink into obscurity as general as was once his celebrity. The first author
       who quotes his works is Hincmar (1.211, 460, 474, 521), <date when-custom="850">A. D. 850</date>,
       and in the subsequent literature of the middle ages the Consolatio gave birth to imitations,
       translations, and commentaries, innumerable. (Warton's <hi rend="ital">Eng. Poet.</hi> 2.342,
       343.) Of four classics in the Paris library in <date when-custom="1300">A. D. 1300</date> this was
       one. (Ib. i. p. cxii.) Of translations the most famous were one into Greek, of the poetical
       portions of the work, by Maximus Planudes (first published by Weber, Darmstadt, 1833), into
       Hebrew by Ben Banschet (Wolf. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Heb.</hi> 1.229, 1092, 243, 354, 369;
       Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Lat.</hi> 3.15), into old High German at the beginning of the
       11th century, by St. Gallen; into French by J. Meun, in 1300, at the order of Philip the
       Fair; but above all, that into Anglo-Saxon by Alfred the Great, which is doubly interesting,
       (1.) as one of the earliest specimens of Anglo-Saxon literature; (2.) as the chief literary
       relic of Alfred himself, whose own mind appears not only in the freedom of the translation,
       but also in large original insertions relative to the kingly office, or to Christian history,
       which last fact strikingly illustrates the total absence of any such in Boethius's own work.
       (Of this the best edition is by J. S. Cardale, with notes and translation, 1828.)</p></div><div><head>Imitations of the <title xml:lang="la">Consolatio</title></head><p>Of imitations may be mentioned:</p><p>1. Chaucer's Testament of Love. (Warton's <hi rend="ital">Eng. Poet.</hi> 2.295.)</p><p>2. <title xml:lang="la">Consolatio Monachorum,</title> by Echard, 1130.</p><p>3. <title xml:lang="la">Consolatio Theologiae,</title> by Gerson.</p><p>4. <title>The King's Complaint</title>, by James I.</p><p>5. An Imitation, by Charles, Duke of Orleans, in the 15th century.</p></div><div><head>Works</head><p>Boethius's own works are as follow:--</p><div><head>1. <title xml:lang="la">De Consolation Philosophiae.</title></head><p>Of its moral and religious character no more need be said. In a literary point of view, it
        is a dialogue between himself and Philosophy, much in the style of the Pastor of Hermas,--a
        work which it resembles in the liveliness of personification, though inferior to it in
        variety and superior in diction. The alternation of prose and verse is thought to have been
        suggested by the nearly contemporary work of Marcianus Capella on the nuptials of Mercury
        and Philology. The verses are almost entirely borrowed from Seneca.</p></div><div><head>Other Works</head><listBibl><bibl>2. <title xml:lang="la">De Unitate et Uno,</title> and <title xml:lang="la">De
          Arithmetica libri II.</title></bibl><bibl>3. <title xml:lang="la">De Musica libri V.</title></bibl><bibl>4. <title xml:lang="la">De Geometria libri II.</title></bibl><bibl>5. <title xml:lang="la">In Porphyrii Phoenicis Isagogen de Praedicabilibus a Victorino
          translatam Diologi II.</title></bibl><bibl>6. <title xml:lang="la">In eandem a se Latine versam Expositio secunda libris
          totidem</title></bibl><bibl>7. <title xml:lang="la">In Categorias Aristotelis libri II.</title></bibl><bibl>8. <title xml:lang="la">In librum Aristotelis de Interpretatione Minorum
          Commentariorum libri</title> ii., and a second ed. called <title xml:lang="la">Comment.
          Majora,</title> in 6 books</bibl><bibl>9. <title xml:lang="la">Analyticorum Aristotelis priorum et posteriorum libri
          IV.</title> iv.</bibl><bibl>10. <title xml:lang="la">Introductio ad Categoricos Syllogismos</title></bibl><bibl>11. <title xml:lang="la">De Syllogismo Categorico libri II.</title>, and <title xml:lang="la">De Hypothetico libri II.</title></bibl><bibl>12. <title xml:lang="la">De Divisione,</title> and <title xml:lang="la">De
          Definitione</title></bibl><bibl>13. <title xml:lang="la">Topicorum Aristotelis libri VIII.</title></bibl><bibl>14. <title xml:lang="la">Elenchorum Sophisticorum libri II.</title></bibl><bibl>15. <title xml:lang="la">In Topica Ciceronis libri VI.</title></bibl><bibl>16. <title xml:lang="la">De Differentüs Topicis libri IV.</title></bibl></listBibl></div></div><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The first collected edition of his works was published at Venet., fol., 1491 (or
        1492)</bibl>; <bibl>the best and most complete at Basel, 1570, fol.</bibl></p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>The chief ancient authorities for his life are the Epistles of Ennodius and Cassiodorus,
       and the History of Procopius. The chief modern authorities are Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl.
        Lat.</hi> 3.15; Tiraboschi, vol. iii. lib. 1. cap. 4; Hand, in Ersch and Gruber's <hi rend="ital">Encyclopädie ;</hi> Barberini, <hi rend="ital">Crit. storica Exposizion
        della Vita di Sev. Boezio,</hi> Pavia, 1783; Heyne, <hi rend="ital">Censura ingenii, &amp;c.
        Boethii,</hi> Gottin.1806. </p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.A.P.S">A.P.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>