<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:B.balsamo_theodorus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:B.balsamo_theodorus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="B"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="balsamo-theodorus-bio-1" n="balsamo_theodorus_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Ba'lsamo</surname>,
         <forename full="yes">Theodo'rus</forename></persName></label></head><p>a celebrated Greek canonist, born at Constantinople, where, under Manuel Comnenus, he filled
      the offices of <hi rend="ital">Magnae Ecclesiae</hi> (S. Sophiae) <hi rend="ital">Diaconus,
       Nomophylax,</hi> and <hi rend="ital">Chartophylax.</hi> Under Isaac Angelus he was elevated
      to the dignity of patriarch of Antioch, about 1185; but, on account of the invasion of the
      Latins, he was never able to ascend the patriarchal throne, and all the business of the
      patriarchate <pb n="460"/> was conducted at Constantinople. He died about 1204.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>Of the works of this author there is no complete edition: they are scattered among various
       collections.</p><div><head>Commentaries upon the <title>Syntagma</title> and the <title>Nomocanon</title> of
        Photius</head><p>Under the auspices of the emperor Manuel Comnenus and of Michael Anchialus, the patriarch
        of Constantinople, he composed commentaries or scholia upon the <title>Syntagma</title> and
        the <title>Nomocanon</title> of Photius. These scholia seem, from external evidence, (though
        there is some difference of opinion among critics as to the exact date of their
        composition,) to have been begun as early as 1166, and not to have been completed before
        1192. They are of much use in illustrating the bearing of the imperial law of Rome upon the
        canon law of the Greek Church. The historical accuracy of Balsamo has been questioned. In
        the preface of lois commentary upon Photius, he refers the last revision of the Basilica to
        Constantinus Porphyrogenitus; whereas Attaliata, Blastares, Harmenopulus, and other
        authorities, concur in ascribing that honour to Leo the Wise.</p><p>The Syntagma of Photius (which is a collection of canons at large), and the Nomocanon
        (which is a systematic abstract), are parts of a single plan; but, with the scholia of
        Balsamo, they have been usually edited separately.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The scholia on the Nomocanon are best given in Justelli et Voelli <hi rend="ital">Bibliotheca Juris Canonici.</hi> (Paris, 1661, vol. ii. p. 789, &amp;c.)</bibl></p><p><bibl>The Syntagma, without the Nomocanon, is printed with the scholia of Balsamo and
          Zonaras subjoined to the text in the Synodicon of Bishop Beveridge.</bibl><bibl>In this edition much use is made of an ancient Bodleian MS., which supplies the
          lacunae of the former printed edition of Paris, 1620.</bibl><bibl>A farther collation of Beveridge's text with three MSS. is given in Wolfii <hi rend="ital">Anecdota Graeca Sacra et profana,</hi> vol. iv. p. 113.</bibl></p><p>The scholia of Balsamo, unlike those of Zonaras, treat not so much of the sense of words
         as of practical questions, and the mode of reconciling apparent contradictions. The text of
         Justinian's collections is carefully compared by Balsamo with the Basilica, and the
         portions of the former which are not incorporated in the latter are regarded by him as
         having no validity in ecclesiastical matters.</p></div></div><div><head><foreign xml:lang="grc">Μελετῶν καὶ ἀποκρίσεων</foreign>, and his answers to the
        questions of Marcus, patriarch of Alexandria</head><p>Other genuine works of Balsamo are extant.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>His book <foreign xml:lang="grc">Μελετῶν καὶ ἀποκρίσεων</foreign>, and his answers
         to the questions of Marcus, patriarch of Alexandria, are given by <bibl>Leunclavius. (<hi rend="ital">Jus. Gr. Rom.</hi> vol. i.)</bibl>
         <bibl>The former work is also to be found in Cotelerius, <hi rend="ital">Eccl. Gr.
           Monum.</hi></bibl></p></div></div><div><head>Works erroneously attributed to Balsamo</head><p>Several works have been erroneously attributed to Balsamo.</p><div><head><title>Ecclesiastical Constitutions</title></head><p>Of these the most important is a Greek collection of Ecclesiastical Constitutions, in
         three books, compiled chiefly from the Digest, Code, and Novells of Justinian.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>It is inserted, with the Latin translation of Leunclavius, in Justelli et Voelli
            <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Jur. Can.</hi> vol. ii.</bibl> F. A. Biener, however, in his
          history of the Authenticae (Diss. i. p. 16), proved that this collection was older than
          Balsamo; and in his history of the Novells (p. 179), he referred it to the time of the
          emperor Heraclius. (<date when-custom="610">A. D. 610</date>-<date when-custom="641">641</date>.)
          Heimbach (<hi rend="ital">Anecdota,</hi> vol. i. pp. xliv.--xlvii) maintains, in
          opposition to Biener, that the collection was made soon after the time of Justin II.
          (565-8), and that four Novells of Heraclius, appended to the work, are the addition of a
          later compiler.</p></div></div><div><head>Arrangement of Justinian's Novells</head><p>There is extant an arrangement of Justinian's Novells according to their contents, which
         was composed, as Biener has shewn, by Athanasius Scholasticus, though a small portion of it
         had been previously printed under the name of Balsamo. (Hugo, <hi rend="ital">Röm. R.
          R.</hi> 14.)</p></div><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Glossa ordinaria</title></head><p>The <title xml:lang="la">Glossa ordinaria</title> of the Basilica, which was formed in
         the 12th century from more ancient scholia, is, without sufficient reason, attributed to
         Balsamo by Assemani. (<hi rend="ital">Bibl. Jur. Orient,</hi> ii. p. 386.)</p></div><div><head><foreign xml:lang="grc">Πρόχειρον</foreign>, or legal manual</head><p>Tigerström, in his <title xml:lang="la">Aeussere Geschichte des Röm.
          Rechts</title> (Berlin, 1841, p. 331), speaks of a <foreign xml:lang="grc">Πρόχειρον</foreign>, or legal manual, of <hi rend="ital">Antiochus</hi> Balsamo, as
         extant in MS.; but he does not say where, nor does he cite any authority for the fact. As
         Tigerström is often inaccurate, we suspect that Antiochus is put by mistake for
         Theodorus, and that the <title xml:lang="la">Procheiron auctum</title> is referred to, of
         which an account is given by C. E. Zachariä, <title xml:lang="la">Historiae Juris
          Graeco-Romani Delineation</title>, § 48.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The commencement of this Procheiron was published, by way of specimen, by
           Zachariä in the Prolegomena to his edition of the Procheiron of the emperor
           Basilius. (Heidelb. 1837.)</bibl> The Procheiron Auctum is supposed by Biener (in
          Savigny's Journal, vol. viii. p. 276) to have been rather later than Balsamo, from whose
          works it borrows, as also from the works of Joannes Citrius, who outlived Balsamo.</p></div></div></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Beveridge, Preface to the <hi rend="ital">Synodicon,</hi> §§ 14-21; Bach, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Jur. Rom.</hi> ed. Stockmann, p. 684; Heimbach, <hi rend="ital">de Basil.
        Orig.</hi> pp. 130, 132; Biener, <hi rend="ital">Gesch. der Nov.</hi> pp. 210-218; Witte, in
        <hi rend="ital">Rhein. Mas. für Jarisp.</hi> iii. p. 37, n.; Walter, <hi rend="ital">Kirchenrecht,</hi> Bonn, 1842,, § 77.</p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.J.T.G">J.T.G</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>