<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.augurinus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.augurinus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="A"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="augurinus-bio-1" n="augurinus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Auguri'nus</surname></persName></head><p>the name of families in the Genucia and Minucia gentes. The word is evidently derived from
      augur.</p><p>I. <hi rend="ital">Genucii Augurini.</hi></p><p>They must originally have been patricians, as we find consuls of this family long before the
      consulship was open to the plebeians. But here a difficulty arises. Livy calls (5.13, 18) Cn.
      Genucius, who was consular tribune in <date when-custom="-99">B. C. 99</date> and again in 396, a
      plebeian, and we learn from the Capitoline Fasti that his surname was Augurinus. Now if Livy
      and the Capitoline Fasti are both right, the Genucii Augurini must have gone over to the
      plebeians, as the Minucii Augurini did. It is possible, however, that Augurinus in the
      Capitoline Fasti may be a mistake for Aventinensis, which we know was a plebeian family of the
      same gens. [<hi rend="smallcaps">AVENTINENSIS.</hi>]</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>