<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.arete_3</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.arete_3</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="A"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="arete-bio-3" n="arete_3"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Are'te</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Ἀρήτη</label>), daughter of Aristippus, the founder of the
      Cyrenaic school of philosophy. She was instructed by him in the principles of his system,
      which she transmitted to her son, Aristippus <foreign xml:lang="grc">μητροδίδακτος</foreign>, to whom Ritter (<hi rend="ital">Gesch. der Phil.</hi> 7.1. 3)
      ascribes the formal completion of the earlier Cyrenaic doctrine. We are told by Diogenes
      Laertius (2.72), that her father taught her contentment and moderation, both by precept and
      practice, and the same duties are insisted on in an epistle now extant, said to be addressed
      to her by him. This letter is certainly spurious [<hi rend="smallcaps">ARISTIPPUS</hi>],
      although Laertius mentions among the writings of Aristippus an <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπιστολὴ πρὸς Ἀρήτην τὴν Δυγατέρα</foreign>. Whether the letter to which he refers
      was the same as that which we possess, is uncertain ; but the fact that it was extant in his
      time would not prove its authenticity. Aelian (<bibl n="Ael. NA 3.40">Ael. NA 3.40</bibl>)
      calls Arete the sister of Aristippus, but this assertion is opposed to the statement of all
      other writers; and, besides, the passage which contains it is corrupt. (<bibl n="D. L. 2.72">D. L. 2.72</bibl>, <bibl n="D. L. 2.86">86</bibl>; Brucker, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Crit.
       Phil.</hi> 2.2, 3.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.G.E.L.C">G.E.L.C</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>