<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.archilochus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.archilochus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="A"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="archilochus-bio-1" n="archilochus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-0232"><surname full="yes">Archi'lochus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Ἀρχίλοχος</surname></persName>), of Paros, was one
      of the earliest Ionian lyric poets, and the first Greek poet who composed Iambic verses
      according to fixed rules. He flourished about 714-676 B. C. (Bode, <hi rend="ital">Geschichte
       der Lyr. Dichtk.</hi> i. pp. 38, 47.) He was descended from a noble family, who held the
      priesthood in Paros. His grandfather was Tellis, who brought the worship of Demeter into
      Thasos, and whose portrait was introduced by Polygnotus into his painting of the infernal
      regions at Delphi. His father was Telesicles, and his mother a slave, named Enipo. In the
      flower of his age (between 710 and 700 B. C.), and probably after he had already gained a
      prize for his hymn to Demeter (Schol. <hi rend="ital">in Aristoph. Av.</hi> 1762), Archilochus
      went from Paros to Thasos with a colony, of which one account makes him the leader. The motive
      for this emigration can only be conjectured. It was most probably the result of a political
      change, to which cause was added, in the case of Archilochus, a sense of personal wrongs. He
      had been a suitor to Neobule, one of the daughters of Lycambes, who first promised and
      afterwards refused to give his daughter to the poet. Enraged at this treatment, Archilochus
      attacked the whole family in an iambic poem, accusing Lycambes of perjury, and his daughters
      of the most abandoned lives. The verses were recited at the festival of Demeter, and produced
      such an effect, that the daughters of Lycambes are said to have hung themselves through shame.
      The bitterness which he expresses in his poems towards his native island (<bibl n="Ath. 3.76">Athen. 3.76</bibl>b.) seems to have arisen in part also from the low estimation in which he
      was held, as being the son of a slave. Neither was he more happy at Thasos. He draws the most
      melancholy picture of his adopted country, which he at length quitted in disgust. (Plut. <hi rend="ital">de Exil.</hi> 12. p. 604; <bibl n="Strabo xiv.p.648">Strabo xiv. p.648</bibl>,
      viii. p. 370; Eustath. <hi rend="ital">in Odyss.</hi> i. p. 227 ; Aelian, <bibl n="Ael. VH 12.50">Ael. VH 12.50</bibl>.) While at Thasos, he incurried the disgrace of losing
      his shield in an engagement with the Thracians of the opposite continent ; but, like Alcaeus
      under similar circumstances, instead of being ashamed of the disaster, he recorded it in his
      verse. Plutarch (<hi rend="ital">Inst. Lacou.</hi> p. 239. b.) states, that Archilochus was
      banished from Sparta the very hour that he had arrived there because he had written in his
      poems, that a <pb n="269"/> man had better throw away his arms than lose his life. But
      Valerius Maximus (6.3, ext. 1) says, that the poems of Archilochus were forbidden at Sparta
      because of their licentiousness, and especially on account of the attack on the daughters of
      Lycambes. It must remain doubtful whether a confusion has been made between the personal
      history of the poet and the fate of his works, both in this instance and in the story that he
      won the prize at Olympia with his hymn to Heracles (Tzetzes, <hi rend="ital">Chil.</hi>
      1.685), of which thus much is certain, that the Olympic victors used to sing a hymn by
      Archilochus in their triumphal procession. (Pindar, <bibl n="Pind. O. 9.1">Pind. O.
      9.1</bibl>.) These traditions, and the certain fact that the fame of Archilochus was spread,
      in his lifetime, over the whole of Greece, together with his unsettled character, render it
      probable that he made many journeys of which we have no account. It seems, that he visited
      Siris in Lower Italy, the only city of which he speaks well. (<bibl n="Ath. 12.523">Athen.
       12.523</bibl>d.) At length he returned to Paros, and, in a war between the Parians and the
      people of Naxos, he fell by the hand of a Naxian named Calondas or Corax. The Delphian oracle,
      which, before the birth of Archilochus, had promised to his father an immortal son, now
      pronounced a curse upon the man who had killed him, because "he had slain the servant of the
      Muses." (Dion Chrysost. <hi rend="ital">Orat.</hi> 33, vol. ii. p. 5.)</p><div><head>Works</head><p>Archilochus shared with his contemporaries, Thaletas and Terpander, in the honour of
       establishing lyric poetry throughout Greece. The invention of the elegy is ascribed to him,
       as well as to Callinus; and though Callinus was somewhat older than Archilochus [<hi rend="smallcaps">CALLINUS</hi>], there is no doubt that the latter was one of the earliest
       poets who excelled in this species of composition. Meleager enumerates him among the poets in
       his <title xml:lang="la">Corona.</title> (38.)</p><div><head>Iambic Poetry</head><p>But it was on his satiric iambic poetry that the fame of Archilochus was founded. The
        first place in this style of poetry was awarded to him by the consent of the ancient
        writers, who did not hesitate to compare him with Sophocles, Pindar, and even
        Homer,--meaning, doubtless, that as they stood at the head of tragic, lyric, and epic
        poetry, so was Archilochus the first of iambic satirical writers; while some place him, next
        to Homer, above all other poets. (Dion Chrysost. <hi rend="ital">l.c. ;</hi> Longin. 13.3;
        Velleius, 1.5; Cicero, <hi rend="ital">Orat.</hi> 2; Heracleitus, apud <hi rend="ital">Diog.
         Laert.</hi> 9.1.) The statues of Archilochus and of Homer were dedicated on the same day
        (Antip. Thessal. <hi rend="ital">Epigr.</hi> 45), and two faces, which are thought to be
        their likenesses, are found placed together in a Janus-like bust. (Visconti, <hi rend="ital">Icon. Gree.</hi> i. p. 62.) The emperor Hadrian judged that the Muses had shown a special
        mark of favour to Homer in leading Archilochus into a different department of poetry. (<hi rend="ital">Epig.</hi> 5.) Other testimonies are collected by Liebel (p. 43).</p><p>The Iambics of Archilochus expressed the strongest feelings in the most unmeasured
        language. The licence of Ionian democracy and the bitterness of a disappointed man were
        united with the highest degree of poetical power to give them force and point. In countries
        and ages unfamiliar with the political and religious licence which at once incited and
        protected the poet, his satire was blamed for its severity (Liebel, p. 41); and the emetion
        accounted most conspicuous in his verses was "rage," as we see in the line of Horace (<hi rend="ital">A. P.</hi> 79) : <quote xml:lang="la" rend="blockquote"><l>Archilochum proproi
          rabies armavit iambo,</l></quote> and in the expression of Hadrian (<hi rend="ital">l.c.),</hi>
        <foreign xml:lang="grc">λυσσῶντας ἰάμβους</foreign>; and his bitterness passed into a
        proverb. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀρχιλόχου πατεῖς</foreign>. But there must have been
        something more than mere sarcastic power, there must have been truth and delicate wit, in
        the sarcasms of the poet whom Plato does not hesitate to call "the very wise," (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τοῦ σοφωτάτου</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Repub.</hi> ii. p. 365.)
        Quintilian (10.1.60) ascribes to him the greatest power of expression, displayed in
        sentences sometimes strong, sometimes brief, with rapid changes (<hi rend="ital">quum
         validae, tum breves vibrantesque sententiae</hi>), the greatest life and nervousness (<hi rend="ital">plurimum sanguinis atque nervorum</hi>), and considers that whatever blame his
        works deserve is the fault of his subjects and not of his genius. In the latter opinion the
        Greek critics seem to have joined. (Plut. <hi rend="ital">de Aud.</hi> 13, p. 45a.) Of
        modern writers, Archilochus has been perhaps best understood by Müller, who says, "The
        ostensible object of Archilochus' Iambics, like that of the later comedy, was to give
        reality to caricatures, every hideous feature of which was made more striking by being
        magnified. But that tllese pictures, like caricatures from the hand of a master, had a
        striking truth, may be inferred from the impression which Archilochus' iambics produced,
        both upon contemporaries and posterity. Mere calumnies could never have driven the daughters
        of Lycambes to hang themselves,--if, indeed, this story is to be believed, and is not a
        gross exaggeration. But we have no need of it; the universal admiration which was awarded to
        Archilochus' iambics proves the existence of a foundation of truth; for when had a satire,
        which was not based on truth, universal reputation for excellence? When Plato produced his
        first dialogues against the sophists, Gorgias is said to have exclaimed "Athens has given
        birth to a new Archilochus !" This comparison, made by a man not unacquainted with art,
        shows at all events that Archilochus must have possessed somewhat of the keen and delicate
        satire which in Plato was most severe where a dull listener would be least sensible of it."
         (<hi rend="ital">History of the Literature of Greece,</hi> i. p. 135.)</p><p>The satire of preceding writers, as displayed for example in the <title>Margites,</title>
        was less pointed, because its objects were chosen out of the remote world which furnished
        all the personages of epic poetry ; while the iambics of Archilochus were aimed at those
        along whom he lived. Hence their personal bitterness and sarcastic power. This kind of
        satire had already been employed in extemporaneous effusions of wit, especially at the
        festivals of Demeter and Cora, and Dionysus. This raillery, a specimen of which is preserved
        in some of the songs of the chorus in Aristophanes' <hi rend="ital">Frogs,</hi> was called
         <hi rend="ital">iambus ;</hi> and the same name was applied to the verse which Archilochus
        invented when he introduced a new style of poetry in the place of these irregular effusions.
        For the measured movement of the heroic hexameter, with its arsis and thesis of equal
        lengths, he substituted a movement in which the arsis was twice as long as the thesis, the
        light tripping character of which was admirably adapted to express the lively play of wit.
        According as the arsis followed or preceded the thesis, the verse gained, in the former
        case, strength, in the latter, speed and lightness, which. are the characteristics <pb n="270"/> respectively of the iambus and of the trochee. These short feet he formed into
        continued systems, by uniting every two of them into a pair (a <hi rend="ital">metre</hi> or
         <hi rend="ital">dipodia),</hi> in which one arsis was more strongly accentuated than the
        other, and one of the two theses was left doubtful as to quantity, so that, considered with
        reference to musical rhythm, each dipod formed a <hi rend="ital">bar.</hi>
        <note anchored="true" place="margin">* These two remarks apply to the <hi rend="ital">first</hi> arsis and
         the <hi rend="ital">first</hi> thesis of the <hi rend="ital">iambic</hi> metre, and to the
          <hi rend="ital">second</hi> arsis and the <hi rend="ital">second</hi> thesis of the
         trochaic : <figure/></note> Hence arose the great kindred dramatic metres, the iambic
        trimeter and the trochaic tetrameter, as well as the shorter forms of iambic and trochaic
        verse. Archilochus was the inventor also of the <hi rend="ital">epode,</hi> which was formed
        by subjoining to one or more verses a shorter one. One form of the epode, in which it
        consists of three trochees, was called the ithyphallic verse (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἰθύφαλλοσ̓</foreign>. He used also a kind of verse compounded of two different metrical
        structures, which was called <hi rend="ital">asynartete.</hi> Some writers ascribe to him
        the invention of the Saturnian verse. (Bentley's <hi rend="ital">Dissertation on
         Phalaris.</hi>) Archilochus introduced several improvements in music, which began about his
        time to be applied to the public recitations of poetry.</p><p>The best opportunity we have of judging of the structure of Archilochus' poetry, though
        not of its satiric character, is furnished by the Epodes of Horace, as we learn from that
        poet himself (<hi rend="ital">Epist.</hi> 1.19. 23) : <quote xml:lang="la" rend="blockquote"><l>Parios ego primum iambos</l><l>Ostendi Latio, numeros animosque secutus</l><l>Archilochi, non res et agentia verba Lycamben.</l></quote></p><p>Some manifest translations of Archilochus may be traced in the Epodes.</p></div></div><div><head>Editions</head><p>The fragments of Archilochus which remain are collected in <bibl>Jacobs' <hi rend="ital">Anthol. Graec.,</hi></bibl>
       <bibl>Gaisford's <hi rend="ital">Poet. Graec. Min.,</hi></bibl>
       <bibl>Bergk's <hi rend="ital">Poet. Lyrici Graec.,</hi></bibl> and by <bibl>Liebel, <hi rend="ital">Archilochi Reliquiae,</hi> Lips. 1812, 8vo.</bibl></p></div><div><head>Testimonia</head><p>Fabricius (ii. pp. 107-110) discusses fully the passages in which other writers of the name
       are supposed to be mentioned. </p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.P.S">P.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>