<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.apollonius_30</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.apollonius_30</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="A"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="apollonius-bio-30" n="apollonius_30"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-0001"><surname full="yes">Apollonius</surname><addName full="yes">RHODIUS</addName></persName></head><p>23. <hi rend="smallcaps">RHODIUS</hi>, was, according to Suidas and his Greek anonymous
      biographers, the son of Silleus or Illeus and Rhode, and born at Alexandria (comp. <bibl n="Strabo xiv.p.655">Strab. xiv. p.655</bibl>) in the phyle Ptolemais, whereas Athenaeus
      (vii. p. 283) and Aelian (<bibl n="Ael. NA 15.23">Ael. NA 15.23</bibl>) describe him as a
      native or, at least, as a citizen of Naucratis. He appears to have been born in the first half
      of the reign of Ptolemy Euergetes, that is, about <date when-custom="-235">B. C. 235</date>, and his
      most active period falls in the reign of Ptolemy Philopator (<date when-custom="-221">B. C.
       221</date>-<date when-custom="-204">204</date>) and of Ptolemy Epiphanes. (<date when-custom="-204">B. C.
       204</date>-<date when-custom="-181">181</date>.) In his youth he was instructed by Callimachus, but
      afterwards we find a bitter enmity existing between them. The cause of this hatred has been
      explained by various suppositions; the most probable of which seems to be, that Apollonius, in
      his love of the simplicity of the ancient poets of Greece and in his endeavour to imitate
      them, offended Callimachus, or perhaps even expressed contempt for his poetry. The love of
      Apollonius for the ancient epic poetry was indeed so great, and had such fascinations for him,
      that even when a youth (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἔφηβος</foreign>) he began himself an epic
      poem on the expedition of the Argonauts. When at last the work was completed, he read it in
      public at Alexandria, but it did not meet with the approbation of the audience. The cause of
      this may in part have been the imperfect character of the poem itself, which was only a
      youthful attempt; but it was more especially owing to the intrigues of the other Alexandrine
      poets, and above all of Callimachus, for Apollonius was in some degree opposed to the taste
      which then prevailed at Alexandria in regard to poetry. Apollonius was deeply hurt at this
      failure, and it is not improbable that the bitter epigram on Callimachus which is still extant
       (<hi rend="ital">Anthol. Graec.</hi> 11.275) was written at that time. Callimachus in return
      wrote an invective-poem called " Ibis," against Apollonius, of the nature of which we may form
      some idea from Ovid's imitation of it in a poem of the same name. Callimachus, moreover,
      expressed his enmity in other poems also, and in his hymn to Apollo there occur several
      hostile allusions to Apollonius, especially in 5.105. Disheartened by these circumstances
      Apollonius left Alexandria and went to Rhodes, which was then one of the great seats of Greek
      literature and learning. Here he revised his poem, and read it to the Rhodians, who received
      it with great approbation. At the same time he delivered lectures on rhetoric, and his
      reputation soon rose to such a height, that the Rhodians honoured him with their franchise and
      other distinctions. Apollomius now regarded himself as a Rhodian, and the surname Rhodius has
      at all times been the name by which he has been distinguished from other persons of the same
      name. Notwithstanding these distinctions, however, he afterwards returned to Alexandria, but
      it is unknown whether he did so of his own accord, or in consequence of an invitation. He is
      said to have now read his revised poem to the Alexandrines, who were so delighted with it,
      that he at once rose to the highest degree of fame and popularity. According to Suidas,
      Apollonius succeeded Eratosthenes as chief librarian of the museum at Alexandria, in the reign
      of Ptolemy Epiphanes, about <date when-custom="-194">B. C. 194</date>. Further particulars about his
      life are not mentioned, but it is probable that he held his office in the museum until his
      death, and one of his biographers states, that he was buried in the same tomb with
      Callimachus.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head><title xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-0001.001">Argonautica</title></head><p>As regards the poem on the expedition of the Argonauts (<title xml:lang="la">Argonautica</title>), which consists of four books and is still extant, Apollonius
        collected his materials from the rich libraries of Alexandria, and his scholiasts are always
        anxious to point out the sources from which he derived this or that account. The poem gives
        a straightforward and simple description of the adventure, and in a tone which is equal
        throughout. The episodes, which are not numerous and contain particular mythuses or
        descriptions of countries, are sometimes very beautiful, and give life and colour to the
        whole poem. The character of Jason, although he is the hero of the poem, is not sufficiently
        developed to win the interest of the reader. The character of Medeia, on the other hand, is
        beautifully drawn, and the gradual growth of her love is described with a truly artistic
        moderation. The language is an imitation of that of Homer, but it is more brief and concise,
        and has all the symptoms of something which is studied and not natural to the poet. The
        Argonautica, in short, is a work of art and labour, and thus forms, notwithstanding its many
        resemblances, a contrast with the natural and easy flow of the Homeric poems. On its
        appearance the work seems to have made a great sensation, for even contemporaries, such as
        Charon, wrote commentaries upon it.</p><div><head><title xml:id="tlg-5012.001">Scholia on Apollonius</title></head><p>Our present Scholia are abridgements of the commentaries of Lucillus of Tarrha,
         Sophocles, and Theon. all of whom seem to have lived before the Christian era. One
         Eirenaeus is also mentioned as having written a critical and exegetical commentary on the
         Argonautica. (Schol. <hi rend="ital">ad Apollon. Rhod.</hi> 1.1299, 2.127, 1015.) The
         common Scholia on Apollonius are called the Florentine Scholia, because they were first
         published at Florence, and to distinguish them from the Paris Scholia, which were first
         published in Schaefer's edition of the Argonautica, and consist chiefly of verbal
         explanations and criticisms.</p></div><div><head>Influence</head><p>Among the Romans the Argonautica was much read, and P. Terentius Varro Atacinus acquired
         great reputation by his translation of it. (Quintil 10.1.87.) The Argonautica of Valerius
         Flaccus is a free imitation of the poem of Apollonius. In the reign of Anastasius 1. one
         Marianus made a Greek paraphrase of Apollonius' poem in 5608 iambics.</p></div><div><head>Editions of the <title>Argonautica</title></head><p><bibl>The first edition of the Argonautica is that of Florence, 1496, 4to., by J.
          Lasearis, which contains the Scholia.</bibl><bibl>The next is the Aldine (Venice, 1581. 8vo.), which is little more than a reprint of
          the Florentine edition.</bibl><bibl>The first really eritical edition <pb n="241"/> is that of Brunck. (Argentorat. 1780,
          in 4to. and 8vo.)</bibl><bibl>The edition of Beck (Leipzig, 1797, 8vo.) is incomplete, and the only volume which
          appeared of it contains the text, with a Latin translation and a few critical
          notes.</bibl><bibl>G. Schaefer published an edition (Leipz. 1810-13, 2 vols. 8vo.), which is an
          improvement upon that of Brunck, and is the first in which the Paris Scholia are
          printed.</bibl><bibl>The best edition is that of Wellauer, Leipzig, 1828, 2 vols. 8vo., which contains the
          various readings of 13 MSS., the Scholia, and short notes</bibl>.</p></div></div><div><head>Lost works</head><p>Besides the Argonautica and epigrams (Antonin. Lib. 23), of which we possess only the one
        on Callimachus, Apollonius wrote several other works which are now lost. Two of them, <title xml:lang="grc">Περὶ Ἀρχιλόχου</title> (<bibl n="Ath. 10.451">Athen. 10.451</bibl>)
        and <title xml:lang="grc">πρὸς Ζηνόδοτον</title> (Schol. Venet. <hi rend="ital">ad Hom.
         Il.</hi> 13.657), were probably grammatical works, and the latter may have had reference to
        the recension of the Homeric poems by Zenodotus, for the Scholia on Homer occasionally refer
        to Apollonius. A third class of Apollonius' writings were his <foreign xml:lang="grc">κτίσεις</foreign>, that is, poems on the origin or foundation of several towns. These
        poems were of an historico-epical character, and most of them seem to have been written in
        hexameter verse. The following are known: <list type="simple"><item>1. <title xml:lang="grc">Ῥόδου κτίσις</title>, of which one line and a half are
          preserved in Stephanus of Byzantium (<hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
          <foreign xml:lang="grc">Δώτιον</foreign>), and to which we have perhaps to refer the
          statements contained in the Scholiast on Pindar. (<hi rend="ital">Ol.</hi> 7.86; <hi rend="ital">Pyth.</hi> 4.57.)</item><item>2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ναυκπάτεως κτίσις</foreign>, of which six lines are
          preserved in Athenaeus. (vii. p. 283, &amp;c.; comp. Aelian, <bibl n="Ael. NA 15.23">Ael.
           NA 15.23</bibl>.)</item><item>3. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀλεξανδρείας κτίσις</foreign>. (Schol. <hi rend="ital">ad Nicand. Ther.</hi> 11.)</item><item>4. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Καύνου κτίσις</foreign>. (Parthen. <hi rend="ital">Erot.</hi> I and 11.) 5. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κνίδης κτίσις</foreign>. (Steph.
          Byz. <hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
          <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ψυκτήριος</foreign>.) Whether the last three were like the
          first two in verse or prose is uncertain, as no fragments are extant.</item><item>6. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κανωπὸς</foreign>, which may likewise have been an
          account of the foundation of Canopus. It was written in verse, and consisted of at least
          two books. Two choliambic lines of it are extant. (Steph. Byz. <hi rend="ital">s. vv.</hi>
          <foreign xml:lang="grc">Χ̔ώρα, Κόρινθος</foreign>.</item></list>
       </p></div></div><div type="section"><head>Bibliography</head><p>Compare E. Gerhard, <hi rend="ital">Lectiones Apollonianae,</hi> Leipzig, 1816, 8vo.;
       Weichert, <hi rend="ital">Ueber das Leben und Gedicht des Apollonius von Rhodus,</hi>
       Meissen, 1821, 8vo.)</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>