<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.antipater_16</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.antipater_16</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="A"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="antipater-bio-16" n="antipater_16"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-1146"><surname full="yes">Anti'pater</surname><addName full="yes">of <hi rend="smallcaps">TARSUS</hi></addName></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Ἀντίπατρος</surname></persName>), of <hi rend="smallcaps">TARSUS</hi>, a Stoic philosopher, was the disciple and successor of Diogenes
      and the teacher of Panaetius, <date when-custom="-144">B. C. 144</date> nearly. (Cic. <hi rend="ital">de Divin.</hi> 1.3, <hi rend="ital">de Off.</hi> 3.12.) Plutarch speaks of him
      with Zeno, Cleanthes, and Chrysippus, as one of the principal Stoic philosophers (<hi rend="ital">de Stoic. Repugnant.</hi> p. 144), and Cicero mentions him as remarkable for
      acuteness. (<hi rend="ital">De Off.</hi> 3.12.) Of his personal history nothing is known.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>The few extant notices of his philosophical opinions would not be a sufficient ground for
       any great reputation, if it were not for the testimony of ancient authors to his merit. He
       seems to have taken the lead during his lifetime in the disputes constantly recurring between
       his own school and the Academy, although he is said to have felt himself so unequal in
       argument to his contemporary Carnceades, in public disputation, <pb n="204"/> that he
       confined himself to writing; whence he was called <foreign xml:lang="grc">καλαμοβόας</foreign>. (Plut. <hi rend="ital">Mor.</hi> p. 514d.; Euseb. <hi rend="ital">de
        Praep. Evang.</hi> 14.8.) He taught belief in God as " a Being blessed, incorruptible, and
       of goodwill to men," and blamed those who ascribed to the gods "generation and corruption,"
       which is said to have been the doctrine of Chrysippus. (Plut. <hi rend="ital">de Stoic.
        Rep.</hi> p. 192.) Besides this treatise " on the gods," he also wrote two books on
       Divination, a common topic among the Stoics, in which he proved the truth of the science from
       the foreknowledge and benevolence of the Deity, explained dreams to be supernatural
       intimations of the future, and collected stories of divination attributed to Socrates. (Cic.
        <hi rend="ital">de Divin.</hi> 1.3, 20, 39, 54.) He is said to have believed that Fate was a
       god, though it is not clear what was implied in this expression (Stob. <hi rend="ital">de
        Fato,</hi> 16); and it appears from Athenaeus that he wrote a treatise entitled <title xml:lang="grc">Περὶ Δεισιδαιμονίας</title>. (viii. p. 346.) Of his labours in moral
       philosophy nothing remains but a few scattered notices, just sufficient to shew that the
       science had begun to decline; the questions which are treated being points of detail, and
       such as had more to do with the application of moral precepts than with the principles
       themselves: such as they were, however, he took higher ground in solving them than his master
       Diogenes. (Cic. <hi rend="ital">de Off.</hi> 3.12, 13, 23.) </p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Compare Varro, <hi rend="ital">de Ling. Lat.</hi> 6.1. p. 184, Fragm. p. 289, ed. Bip. </p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.C.E.P">C.E.P</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>