<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.andocides_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.andocides_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="A"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="andocides-bio-1" n="andocides_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-0027"><surname full="yes">Ando'cides</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Ἀνδοκίδης</label>), one of the ten Attic orators, whose works
      were contained in the Alexandrine Canon, was the son of Leogoras, and was born at Athens in
       <date when-custom="-467">B. C. 467</date>. He belonged to the ancient eupatrid family of the
      Ceryces, who traced their pedigree up to Odysseus and the god Hermes. (Plut. <hi rend="ital">Vit. X. Orat.</hi> p. 834b., <hi rend="ital">Alcib.</hi> 21 ; comp. Andoc. <hi rend="ital">de Redit.</hi> § 26; <hi rend="ital">de Myster.</hi> § 141.) Being a noble, he of
      course joined the oligarchical party at Athens, and through their influence obtained, in <date when-custom="-436">B. C. 436</date>, together with Glaucon, the command of a fleet of twenty sail,
      which was to protect the Corcyraeans against the Corinthians. (<bibl n="Thuc. 1.51">Thuc.
       1.51</bibl>; Plut. <hi rend="ital">Vit. X. Orat. l.c.</hi>) After this he seems to have been
      employed on various occasions as ambassador to Thessaly, Macedonia, Molossia, Thesprotia,
      Italy, and Sicily (Andoc. <hi rend="ital">c. Alcib.</hi> § 41); and, although he was
      frequently attacked for his political opinions (<hi rend="ital">c. Alcib.</hi> § 8), he
      yet maintained his ground, until in <date when-custom="-415">B. C. 415</date>, when he became
      involved in the charge brought against Alcibiades for having profaned the mysteries and <pb n="169"/> mutilated the Hermae. It appeared the more likely that Andocides was an accomplice
      in the latter of these crimes, which was believed to be a preliminary step towards
      overthrowing the democratical constitution, since the Hermes standing close to his house in
      the phyle Aegeis was among the very few which had not been injured. (Plut. <hi rend="ital">ll.
       cc. ;</hi> Nepos, <hi rend="ital">Alcib.</hi> 3; Sluiter, <hi rend="ital">Lec. Andoc.</hi>
      100.3.) Andocides was accordingly seized and thrown into prison, but after some time recovered
      his liberty by a promise that he would reveal the names of the real perpetrators of the crime;
      and on the suggestion of one Charmides or Timaeus (<hi rend="ital">de Myst.</hi> § 48;
      Plut. <hi rend="ital">Alcib. l.c.</hi>), he mentioned four, all of whom were put to death. He
      is said to have also denounced his own father, but to have rescued him again in the hour of
      danger. But as Andocides was unable to clear himself from the charge, he was deprived of his
      rights as a citizen, and left Athens. (<hi rend="ital">De Red.</hi> § 25.) He now
      travelled about in various parts of Greece, and was chiefly engaged in commercial enterprises
      and in forming connexions with powerful and illustrious persons. (<hi rend="ital">De
       Myst.</hi> § 137; Lys. <hi rend="ital">c. Andoc.</hi> § 6.) The means he employed
      to gain the friendship of powerful men were sometimes of the most disreputable kind ; among
      which a service he rendered to a prince in Cyprus is particularly mentioned. (Comp. Plut. <hi rend="ital">l.c.;</hi> Phot. <hi rend="ital">Bibl.</hi> p. 488, ed. Bekker; Tzetz. <hi rend="ital">Chil.</hi> 6.373, &amp;c.) In <date when-custom="-411">B. C. 411</date>, Andocides
      returned to Athens on the establishment of the oligarchical government of the Four Hundred,
      hoping that a certain service he had rendered the Athenian ships at Samos would secure him a
      welcome reception. (<hi rend="ital">De Red.</hi> §§ 11, 12.) But no sooner were the
      oligarchs informed of the return of Andocides, than their leader Peisander had him seized, and
      accused him of having supported the party opposed to them at Samos. During his trial,
      Andocides, who perceived the exasperation prevailing against him, leaped to the altar which
      stood in the court, and there assumed the attitude of a suppliant. This saved his life, but he
      was imprisoned. Soon afterwards, however, he was set free, or escaped from prison. (<hi rend="ital">De Red.</hi> § 15; Plut. <hi rend="ital">l.c. ;</hi> Lysias. <hi rend="ital">c. Andoc.</hi> § 29.)</p><p>Andocides now went to Cyprus, where for a time he enjoyed the friendship of Evagoras; but,
      by some circumstance or other, he exasperated his friend, and was consigned to prison. Here
      again he escaped, and after the victory of the democratical party at Athens and the abolition
      of the Four Hundred, he ventured once more to return to Athens; but as he was still suffering
      under the sentence of civil disfranchisement, he endeavoured by means of bribes to persuade
      the prytanes to allow him to attend the assembly of the people. The latter, however, expelled
      him from the city. (Lys. <hi rend="ital">c. Andoc.</hi> § 29.) It was on this occasion,
       <date when-custom="-411">B. C. 411</date>, that Andocides delivered the speech still extant <title xml:id="tlg-0027.002">on his Return</title> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ τῆς ἑαυτοῦ
       καθόδου</foreign>), in which he petitioned for permission to reside at Athens, but in vain.
      In this his third exile, Andocides went to reside in Elis (Plut. <hi rend="ital">Vit. X.
       Orat.</hi> p. 835a.; Phot. <hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>), and during the time of his absence
      from his native city, his house there was occupied by Cleophon, a manufacturer of lyres, who
      had placed himself at the head of the democratical party. (<hi rend="ital">De Myst.</hi>
      § 146.)</p><p>Andocides remained in exile till the year <date when-custom="-403">B. C. 403</date>, after the
      overthrow of the tyranny of the Thirty by Thrasybulus, when the general amnesty then
      proclaimed made him hope that its benefit would be extended to him also. He himself says (<hi rend="ital">de Myst.</hi> § 132), that he returned to Athens from Cyprus, from which we
      may infer, that although he was settled in Elis, he had gone from thence to Cyprus for
      commercial or other purposes; for it appears that he had become reconciled to the princes of
      that island, as he had great influence and considerable landed property there. (<hi rend="ital">De Red.</hi> § 20, <hi rend="ital">De Myst.</hi> § 4.) In consequence
      of the general amnesty, he was allowed to remain at Athens, enjoyed peace for the next three
      years, and soon recovered an influential position. According to Lysias (<hi rend="ital">c.
       Andoc.</hi> § 33, comp. § 11), it was scarcely ten days after his return that he
      brought an accusation against Archippus or Aristippus, which, however, he dropped on receiving
      a sum of money. During this period Andocides became a member of the senate, in which he
      appears to have possessed great influence, as well as in the popular assembly. He was
      gymnasiarch at the Hephaestaea, was sent as architheorus to the Isthmian and Olympic games,
      and was at last even entrusted with the office of keeper of the sacred treasury. But these
      distinctions appear to have excited the envy and hatred of his former enemies ; for in the
      year <date when-custom="-400">B. C. 400</date>, Callias, supported by Cephisius, Agyrrhius, Meletus,
      and Epichares, urged the necessity of preventing Andocides from attending the assembly, as he
      had never been formally freed from the civil disfranchisement. But as Callias had but little
      hope in this case, he brought against him the charge of having profaned the mysteries and
      violated the laws respecting the temple at Eleusis. (<hi rend="ital">De Myst.</hi> § 110,
      &amp;c.) The orator pleaded his case in the oration still extant, <title xml:id="tlg-0027.001">On the Mysteries</title> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ τῶν μυστηρίων</foreign>), and
      was acquitted. After this attempt to crush him, he again enjoyed peace and occupied his former
      position in the republic for upwards of six years, at the end of which, in <date when-custom="-394">B. C. 394</date>, he was sent as ambassador to Sparta respecting the peace to be concluded
      in consequence of Conon's victory off Cnidus. On his return he was accused of illegal conduct
      during his embassy (<foreign xml:lang="grc">παραπρεσβείας</foreign>). The speech <title xml:id="tlg-0027.003">On the Peace with Lacedaemon</title> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ
       τῆς πρὸς Λακεδαιμονίονς εἰρήνης</foreign>), which is still extant, refers to this
      affair. It was spoken in <date when-custom="-393">B. C. 393</date>. (Clinton places it in 391.)
      Andocides was found guilty, and sent into exile for the fourth time. He never returned
      afterwards, and seems to have died soon after this blow.</p><p>Andocides appears to have left no issue, since at the age of seventy he had no children (<hi rend="ital">de Myst.</hi> §§ 146, 148), though the scholiast on Aristophanes (<bibl n="Aristoph. Wasps 1262">Aristoph. Wasps 1262</bibl>) mentions Antiphon as a son of
      Andocides. This was probably owing to his wandering and unsteady life, as well as to his
      dissolute character. (<hi rend="ital">De Myst.</hi> § 100.) The large fortune which he
      had inherited from his father, or acquired in his commercial undertakings, was greatly
      diminished in the latter years of his life. (<hi rend="ital">De Myst.</hi> § 144; Lys.
       <hi rend="ital">c. Andoc.</hi> § 31.)</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Surviving Orations</head><p>Andocides has no claims to the esteem of posterity, either as a man or as a citizen.
        Besides the three orations already mentioned -- <title>on his Return</title> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ τῆς ἑαυτοῦ καθόδου</foreign>), <title>On the Mysteries</title>
         (<foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ τῶν μυστηρίων</foreign>), <title>On the Peace with
         Lacedaemon</title> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ τῆς πρὸς Λακεδαιμονίονς
         εἰρήνης</foreign>) --, which are undoubtedly genuine, there is a fourth <title xml:id="tlg-0027.004">Against Alcibiades</title> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">κατὰ
         Ἀλκιβιάδου</foreign>), said to have been delivered by Andocides in <date when-custom="-415">B.
         C. 415</date>; but it is in all probability spurious, though it appears to contain genuine
        historical matter. <pb n="170"/> Taylor ascribed it to Phaeax, while others think it more
        probable that it is the work of some of the later rhetoricians, with whom the accusation or
        defence of Alcibiades was a standing theme.</p></div><div><head>Fragments</head><p>Besides these four orations we possess only a few fragments and some very vague allusions
        to other orations. (Sluiter, <hi rend="ital">Lect. And.</hi> p. 239, &amp;c.) As an orator
        Andocides does not appear to have been held in very high esteem by the ancients, as he is
        seldom mentioned, though Valerius Theon is said to have written a commentary on his
        orations. (Suidas, <hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
        <foreign xml:lang="grc">Θέων</foreign>.) We do not hear of his having been trained in
        any of the sophistical schools of the time, and he had probably developed his talents in the
        practical school of the popular assembly. Hence his orations have no mannerism in them, and
        are really, as Plutarch says, simple and free from all rhetorical pomp and ornament. (Comp.
        Dionys. <hi rend="ital">de Lys. 2, de Thuc. Jud.</hi> 51.) Sometimes, however, his style is
        diffuse, and becomes tedious and obscure. The best among the orations is that on the
        Mysteries; but, for the history of the time, all are of the highest importance.</p></div></div><div><head>Editions</head><p>The orations are printed in the collections of the Greek orators by <bibl>Aldus</bibl>,
        <bibl>H. Stephens</bibl>, <bibl>Reiske</bibl>, <bibl>Bekker</bibl>, and others. The best
       separate editions are those of <bibl>C. Schiller, Leipzig, 1835, 8vo.</bibl>, and of
        <bibl>Baiter and Sauppe, Zürich, 1838</bibl>. The most important works on the life and
       orations of Andocides are : <bibl>J. O. Sluiter, <title>Lectiones Andocideae,</title> Leyden,
        1804, pp. 1-99, reprinted at Leipzig, 1834, with notes by C. Schiller</bibl>; <bibl>a
        treatise of A. G. Becker prefixed to his German translation of Andocides, Quedlinburg, 1832,
        8vo.</bibl>; <bibl>Ruhnken, <title>Hist. Crit. Orat. Graec.</title> pp. 47-57</bibl>;
        <bibl>Westermann, <title>Gesch. der Griech. Beredtsamkeit,</title> §§ 42 and
        43</bibl>. </p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.L.S">L.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>