<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.anaximenes_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.anaximenes_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="A"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="anaximenes-bio-1" n="anaximenes_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-0617"><surname full="yes">Anaxi'menes</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Ἀναξιμένης</label>), who is usually placed third in the series
      of Ionian philosophers, was born at Miletus, like Thales and Anaximander, with both of whom he
      had personal intercourse : for besides the common tradition which makes him a disciple of the
      latter, Diogenes Laertius quotes at length two letters said to have been written to Pythagoras
      by Anaximenes; in one of which he gives an account of the death of Thales, speaking of him
      with reverence, as the first of philosophers, and as having been his own teacher. In the
      other, he congratulates Pythagoras on his removal to Crotona from Samos, while he was himself
      at the mercy of the tyrants of Miletus, and was looking forward with fear to the approaching
      war with the Persians, in which he foresaw that the Ionians must be subdued. (<bibl n="D. L. 2.3">D. L. 2.3</bibl>, &amp;c.)</p><p>There is no safe testimony as to the exact periods of the birth and death of Anaximenes :
      but since there is sufficient evidence that he was the teacher of Anaxagoras, <date when-custom="-480">B. C. 480</date>, and he was in repute in <date when-custom="-544">B. C. 544</date>,
      he must have lived to a great age. (<bibl n="Strabo xiv.p.645">Strab. xiv. p.645</bibl>; Cic.
       <hi rend="ital">de Nat. Deor.</hi> 1.11 ; Origen, vol. iv. p. 238.) The question is discussed
      by Clinton in the Philological Museum. (Vol. i. p. 86, &amp;c.)</p><p>Like the other early Greek philosophers, he employed himself in speculating upon the origin,
      and accounting for the phenomena, of the universe: and as Thales held water to be the material
      cause out of which the world was made, so Anaximenes considered air to be the first cause of
      all things, the primary form, as it were, of matter, into which the other elements of the
      universe were resolvable. (<bibl n="Aristot. Met. 1.983a">Aristot. Met. 1.3</bibl>.) For both
      philosophers seem to have thought it possible to simplify physical science by tracing all
      material things up to a single element: while Anaximander, on the contrary, regarded the
      substance out of which the universe was formed as a mixture of all elements and qualities. The
      process by which, according to Anaximenes, finite things were formed from the infinite air,
      was that of compression and rarefaction produced by motion which had existed from all eternity
      : thus the earth was created out of air made dense, and from the earth the sun and the other
      heavenly bodies. (Plut. apud <hi rend="ital">Euseb. Praep. Evang.</hi> 1.8.) According to the
      same theory, heat and cold were produced by different degrees of density of the primal element
      : the clouds were formed by the thickening of the air; and the earth was kept in its place by
      the support of the air beneath it and by the flatness of its shape. (Plut. <hi rend="ital">de
       Pr. Frig. 7, de Plac. Ph.</hi> 3.4; <bibl n="Aristot. Meteo. 2.354b">Aristot. Met.
       2.13</bibl>.)</p><p>Hence it appears that Anaximenes, like his predecessors, held the eternity of matter : nor
      indeed does he seem to have believed in the existence of anything immaterial; for even the
      human soul, according to his theory, is, like the body, formed of air (Plut. <hi rend="ital">de Plac. Ph.</hi> 1.3); and he saw no necessity for supposing an Agent in the work of
      creation, since he held that motion was a natural and necessary law of the universe. It is
      therefore not unreasonable in Plutarch to blame him, as well as Anaximander, for assigning
      only the material, and no efficient, cause of the world in his philosophical system. (Plut.
       <hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.C.E.P">C.E.P</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>