<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.alcmaeon_3</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.alcmaeon_3</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="A"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="alcmaeon-bio-3" n="alcmaeon_3"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-0766"><surname full="yes">Alcmaeon</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Ἀλκμαίων</label>), one of the most eminent natural philosophers
      of antiquity, was a native of Crotona in Magna Graecia. His father's name was Pirithus, and he
      is said to have been a pupil of Pythagoras, and must therefore have lived <pb n="105"/> in the
      latter half of the sixth century before Christ. (<bibl n="D. L. 8.83">D. L. 8.83</bibl>.)
      Nothing more is known of the events of his life.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Work on Dissection</head><p>His most celebrated anatomical discovery has been noticed in the <hi rend="ital">Dict. of
         Ant.</hi> p. 756a; but whether his knowledge in this branch of science was derived from the
        dissection of animals or of human bodies, is a disputed question, which it is difficult to
        decide. Chalcidius, on whose authority the fact rests, merely says (<hi rend="ital">Comment.
         in Plat.</hi> "<hi rend="ital">Tim.</hi>" p. 368, ed. Fabr.), " qui primus exsectionem
        aggredi est ausus," and the word <hi rend="ital">exsectio</hi> would apply equally well to
        either case.</p></div><div><head>Natural Philosophy and Fables</head><p>He is said also (Diog. Laert. <hi rend="ital">l.c.;</hi> Clemens Alexandr. <hi rend="ital">Strom.</hi> i. p. 308) to have been the first person who wrote on natural philosophy
         (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Φυσικὸν λόγον</foreign>), and to have invented fables (<hi rend="ital">fabulas,</hi> Isid. <hi rend="ital">Orig.</hi> 1.39).</p></div><div><head>Other Medical and Philosophical Works</head><p>He also wrote several other medical and philosophical works, of which nothing but the
        titles and a few fragments have been preserved by Stobaeus (<hi rend="ital">Eclog.
         Phys.</hi>) Plutarch (<hi rend="ital">De Phys. Philos. Decr.</hi>), and Galen. (<hi rend="ital">Histor. Philosophy.</hi>)</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>A further account of his philosophical opinions may be found in Menage's Notes to Diogenes
       Laertius, 8.83, p. 387; Le Clerc, <hi rend="ital">Hist. de la Méd. ;</hi> Alfons.
       Ciacconius apud <hi rend="ital">Flbric, Biblioth. Graec.</hi> vol. xiii. p. 48, ed. vet.;
       Sprengel, <hi rend="ital">Hist. de la Méd.</hi> vol. i. p. 239; C. G. Kühn, <hi rend="ital">De Philosoph. ante Hippocr. Medicinae Cultor.</hi> Lips. 1781, 4to., reprinted
       in Ackermann's <hi rend="ital">Opusc. ad Histor. Medic. Pertinentia,</hi> Norimb. 1797, 8vo.,
       and in Kühn's <hi rend="ital">Opusc. Acad. Med. et Philol.</hi> Lips. 1827-8, 2 vols.
       8vo.; Isensec, <hi rend="ital">Gesch. der Medicin.</hi> [<ref target="author.W.A.G">W.A.G</ref>]</p></div><div><head>Assessment</head><p>Although Alcmaeon is termed a pupil of Pythagoras, there is great reason to doubt whether
       he was a Pythagorean at all; his name seems to have crept into the lists of supposititious
       Pythagoreans given us by later writers. (Brandis, <hi rend="ital">Geschichte der
        Philosophie,</hi> vol. i. p. 507.) Aristotle (<hi rend="ital">Metaphys.</hi> A. 5) mentions
       him as nearly contemporary with Pythagoras, but distinguishes between the <foreign xml:lang="grc">στοιχεῖα</foreign> of opposites, under which the Pythagoreans included all
       things, and the double principle of Alcmaeon, according to Aristotle, less extended, although
       he does not explain the precise difference. Other doctrines of Alcmaaeon have been preserved
       to us. He said that the human soul was immortal and partook of the divine nature, because
       like the heavenly bodies it contained in itself a principle of motion. (Arist. <hi rend="ital">de Anima</hi> 1.2, p. 405; Cic. <hi rend="ital">de Nat. Deor.</hi> 1.11.) The
       eclipse of the moon, which was also eternal, he supposed to arise from its shape, which he
       said was like a boat. All his doctrines which have come down to us, relate to physics or
       medicine; and seem to have arisen partly out of the speculations of the Ionian school, with
       which rather than the Pythagorean, Aristotle appears to connect Alcmaeon, partly front the
       traditionary lore of the earliest medical science. (Brandis, vol. i. p. 508.) </p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.B.J">B.J</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>