<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.agatharchus_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.agatharchus_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="A"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="agatharchus-bio-2" n="agatharchus_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Agatharchus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Ἀγάθαρχος</surname></persName>), a Athenian artist,
      said by Vitruvius (<hi rend="ital">Praef. ad lib.</hi> vii.) to have invented scene-painting,
      and to have painted a scene (<hi rend="ital">scenam fecit</hi>) for a tragedy which Aeschylus
      exhibited. As this appears to contradict Aristotle's assertion (<hi rend="ital">Poet.</hi>
      4.16), that scene-painting was introduced by Sophocles, some scholars understand Vitruvius to
      mean merely, that Agatharchus constructed a stage. (Compare Hor. <hi rend="ital">Ep ad.
       Pis.</hi> 279 : <hi rend="ital">et modicis instraxit pulpita tignis.</hi>) But the context
      shews clearly that perspective painting must be meant, for Vitruvius goes on to say, that
      Democritus and Anaxagoras, carrying out the principles laid down in the treatise of
      Agatharchus, wrote on the same subject, shewing how, in drawing, the lines ought to be made to
      correspond, according to a natural proportion, to the figure which would be traced out on an
      imaginary intervening plane by a pencil of rays proceeding from the eye, as a fixed point of
      sight, to the several points of the object viewed.</p><p>It was probably not till towards the end of Aeschylus's career that scene-painting was
      introduced, and not till the time of Sophocles that it was generally made use of; which may
      account for what Aristotle says.</p><p>There was another Greek painter of the name of Agatharchus, who was a native of the island
      of Samos, and the son of Eudemus. He was a contemporary of Alcibiades and Zeuxis. We have no
      definite accounts respecting his performances, but he does not appear to have been an artist
      of much merit : he prided himself chiefly on the ease and rapidity with which he finished his
      works. (<bibl n="Plut. Per. 13">Plut. Per. 13</bibl>.) Plutarch (<bibl n="Plut. Alc. 16">Plut.
       Alc. 16</bibl>) and Andocides at greater length (<hi rend="ital">in Alcib.</hi> p. 31. 15)
      tell an anecdote of Alcibiades having inveigled Agatharchus to his house and kept him there
      for more than three months in striet durance, compelling him to adorn it with his pencil. The
      speech of Andocides above referred to seems to have been delivered after the destruction of
      Melos (<date when-custom="-416">B. C. 416</date>) and before the expedition to Sicily (<date when-custom="-415">B. C. 415</date>); so that from the above data the age of Agatharchus may be
      accurately fixed. Some scholars (as Bentley, Böttiger, and Meyer) have supposed him to be
      the same as <pb n="62"/> the contemporary of Aeschylus, who, however, must have preceded him
      by a good half century. Müller, <hi rend="ital">Arch. d. Kunst,</hi> p. 88.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.C.P.M">C.P.M</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>