<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlpsci:bodin.livrep.perseus-eng1:5.2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlpsci:bodin.livrep.perseus-eng1:5.2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:pdlpsci:bodin.livrep.perseus-eng1" xml:lang="eng"><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><pb n="569" facs="286"/><head><hi rend="italic">CHAP. II.</hi><milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> The meanes to preuent the changes of
                     Commonweales, which happen through the great riches of some, and exceeding
                     pouertie of others.</head><p><seg rend="decorInit">A</seg>Mong all the causes of seditions and changes of
                        Commonweales<note place="marg" anchored="true">The chiefest cause of the change and
                        subuersion of a state</note> there is none greater than the excessiue wealth
                     of some fewe subiects, and the extreme pouertie of the greatest part. All
                     antient histories are full, whereas it appeares that all they which haue
                     pretended any discontentment against the state, have alwayes <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> imbraced the first occasion to spoile the rich: yet these
                     changes and mutenies were more ordinarie in old time than at this day, for the
                     infinite number of slaues which were thirtie or fortie for one free man; and
                     the greatest reward of their seruice, was to see themselves freed, although
                     they reaped no other benefit but only libertie, which many bought with that
                     which they had spared all their life time, or else with what they borrowed,
                     binding themselves to restore it, besides the duties they did owe to them that
                     did infranchise them: besides, they had many children, which happens most
                     commonly to them that labour most,<note place="marg" anchored="true">The cause of <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/> in an estate.</note> and live most continently, so as
                     seeing themselves in libertie and opprest with pouertie,<milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> they were forced to borrow upon interest, to sell their
                     children, or to satisfie their creditors with their fruites and labours; and
                     the longer they lived, the more they were indebted, and the lesse able to pay:
                     for the Hebrewes called vsurie a biting, which doth not only wast the debtor
                     unto the bones, but doth also suck both bloud and marrow, so as in the end the
                     number of the poore being increased, and not able to indure this want, they did
                     rise against the rich, and expelled them from their houses and townes, or else
                     they lived on them at discretion. And therefore <hi rend="italic">Plato</hi>
                     called riches and pouertie<note place="marg" anchored="true">The two plagues of all Common<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>.</note> the two antient plagues of a Commonweale,
                     not only for the necessitie that doth oppresse the hongrie, but also for the
                     shame, the which is more insupportable to many than pouertie it selfe: for the
                     preuenting whereof, some have sought an equalitie, the <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> which many have commended, tearming it the nurse of peace,
                     and loue betwixt subiects; and contrariwise inequalitie the spring of all
                     diuisions, factions, hatred and partialities: for he that hath more than an
                     other, and sees himselfe to have greater wealth, he will also be higher in
                     honor, in delights, in pleasures, in diet and in apparell, hauing no great
                     regard of vertue: the poore on their part conceiue an extreme hatred and
                     iealousie, seeing themselves thus troden under foote, they thinke themselves
                     more worthie than the rich, and yet are opprest with pouertie, honger, miserie
                     and reproch. And therefore many antient law giuers did equally diuide the goods
                     and lands among the<note place="marg" anchored="true">Equalitie the surest maintenanc<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> of a Commonweale.</note> subiects, as in our time
                        <hi rend="italic">Thomas Moore</hi> Chancellor of England in his Commonweale
                     sayth, That the only way of safetie for an estate, is when as men live in
                     common: the <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> which cannot be whereas is any
                     proprietie. And <hi rend="italic">Plato</hi> hauing charge to frame the
                     Commonweale and new Colonie of the Thebans and Phociens, by the consent of the
                     subiects which sent Ambassadors to him to that end, he departed, leauing it
                     vnfinished, for that the rich would not impart any of their wealth unto the
                     poore: the which <hi rend="italic">Licurgus</hi> did with the hazard of his
                     life, for after that he had banished the vse of gold and siluer, he made an
                     equall distribution of the lands. And although that <hi rend="italic">Solon</hi> could not do the like, yet his will was good, for that he made
                     frustrate all bonds, and granted a generall abolition of debts. And after that
                     the vse of gold and siluer was allowed in Lacedemon after the victorie of <hi rend="italic">Lisander,</hi> and that the testamentarie law was brought <pb n="570" facs="287"/> in, the which was partly the cause of inequalitie of
                     goods: King <hi rend="italic">Agis</hi> seeking to bring <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> in the antient equalitie, he caused all bonds and
                     obligations to be brought into a publike place and there burnt them, saying,
                     That he had neuer seene a goodlier fier: then he began to deuide his owne goods
                     equally, but when he sought to distribute the lands, he was cast into prison by
                     the Ephores and there slaine. In like sort <hi rend="italic">Nabis</hi> the
                     tyrant hauing taken the citie of Argos, published two Edicts, the one to free
                     them of all debts, the other to deuide the lands equally: <hi rend="italic">Duas faces</hi> (sayth <hi rend="italic">Titus Liuius</hi>) <hi rend="italic">no<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>antibus res ad plebem in optimates
                        accendendam:</hi> Two firebrands for them that sought for innouations to
                     kindle and incense the people against the better sort. And although the Romains
                     have in that point seemed more iust than other nations, yet have they often
                     granted a generall recision of debts sometimes for a fourth part,<milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> sometimes for a third, and sometimes for all; hauing
                     no better meanes to pacifie the mutinies and seditions of the multitude, least
                     it should happen unto them as it did unto the chiefe men among the Thuriens,
                     who hauing gotten all the lands into their hands, the people seeing themselves
                     opprest with debt and vsurie, and without any meanes to satisfie, they fell
                     upon the rich and expelled them from their goods and houses. These reasons may
                     be held goodly in shew, when as in truth there is nothing<note place="marg" anchored="true">Equalitie of goods dangerous to a Commonweale.</note> more pernitious and
                     dangerous to Commonweales, than equalitie of goods, the which have no firmer
                     support and foundation than faith, without the which neither iustice, nor
                     publike societie can stand, neither can there be any faith, if there be not a
                     due obseruation of conuentions and lawfull promises. If then bonds be broken,
                     contracts <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> disanulled, and debts abolished,
                     what can there be expected but the vtter subuersion of an estate? for there can
                     be no trust one in an other. Moreover such generall abolitions do most commonly
                     hurt the poore, and ruine many, for the poore widowes, orphelins, and meaner
                     sort hauing nothing but some little rent, are vndone when this abolition<note place="marg" anchored="true">Abolition of debts ruins the poorer sort.</note> of debts
                     comes; whereas the vsurers preuent it, and oftentimes gaine by it: as it
                     happened when as <hi rend="italic">Solon</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Agis</hi>
                     did publish an abolition of debts, for the vsurers (hauing some intelligence
                     thereof) borrowed money of all men, to defraud their creditors. Besides, the
                     hope of these abolitions do incourage the prodigall to borrow at what rate
                     soeuer, and when their credit is crackt to ioyne with the poore which are
                     discontented and desperate, and to stir up seditions: whereas if the hope of
                     these abolitions <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> were not, every one would
                     seeke to gouerne his estate wisely, and to live in peace. If it be vniust for
                     the creditor to lose his goods, and the debter to gaine that which is not his,
                     how much more vniust is it to take land from the lawfull owners to enrich<note place="marg" anchored="true">The equall diuision of lands most iniust.</note> other men with
                     their spoyles: for they that seeke to be freed from their debts, pretend the
                     oppression of vsurie, and the barren nature of siluer, the which cannot be in
                        lawfull<note place="marg" anchored="true">Equalitie of goods the ruine of humane
                        societie.</note> successions, so as we may rightly say, that such a diuision
                     of another mans goods, is a meere robberie under a shew of equalitie, and the
                     ruine not onely of a Commonweale, but of all humane societie. To say, That
                     equalitie is the nurce of friendship; is but to abuse the ignorant: for it is
                     most certaine, that there is neuer greater hatred, nor more capitall quarrels,
                     than betwixt equals: and the iealousie betwixt equals, is the spring and
                        <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> fountaine of troubles, seditions, and
                     civill warres. Whereas contrariwise the poore and the weake yeeld and obey
                     willingly the great, rich, and mightie, for the helpe and profit which they
                     expect: which was one of the reasons which moued <hi rend="italic">Hippodamus</hi> the law giuer of the Milesians, to ordaine, That the poore
                     should marrie with the rich, not onely to auoid inequalitie, but also to make
                     their friendship the more firme. And whatsoeuer they say of <hi rend="italic">Solon,</hi> it appeares sufficiently by the institution of his Commonweale,
                     that he made foure degrees of citisens according to their reuenewes, and as
                     many degrees<note place="marg" anchored="true">Solons deuision of citisens.</note> of state and
                     honours: the rich had five hundred measures of corne, wine, or oyle, <pb n="571" facs="287"/> in rent; the next three hundred, others two hundred,
                     and those which had lesse might <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> beare no
                     office of honour. And euen <hi rend="italic">Plato</hi> hath made three estates
                     in his second Commonweale, one richer than another, ordaining, That every one
                     of the five thousand &amp; fortie citisens, should leaue one of his children
                     sole heire. And as for that which <hi rend="italic">Licurgus</hi> did, who
                     would have equalitie perpetually obserued in succession, diuiding the lands by
                     the powle; it was impossible, for that he might see before his eyes, or soone
                        after,<note place="marg" anchored="true">Equalitie impossible to be kept in a state.</note>
                     this equalitie quite altered, some hauing twelue or fifteene children, others
                     one or two, or none at all: the which would be more ridiculous in those
                     countries whereas pluralitie of wiues is tollerated, as in Asia, and in a
                     manner throughout all Affrike, and at the new found lands, whereas it falles
                     out oftentimes, that one man hath fiftie children. Some have sought to preuent
                     this inconuenience, as <hi rend="italic">Hippodamus</hi> law-maker to
                        <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> the Milesians, who would not allow aboue
                     ten thousand citisens, the which <hi rend="italic">Aristotle</hi> did like well
                     of, but by that meanes they must banish the ouerplus, or else execute the
                     cruell law of <hi rend="italic">Plato</hi> approued by <hi rend="italic">Aristotle,</hi> who hauing limited the number of his citisens<note place="marg" anchored="true">A cruell law made by Plato.</note> to five thousand and fortie,
                     ordained that they should cause the rest to miscarrie as soone as they were
                     conceiued, and those that were borne lame or crooked should be cast off: the
                     which cannot be spoken without great impietie, that the goodliest creature
                     which God hath made, should not only be made away after it is borne, but also
                     be destroyed in the mothers womb. Whereunto <hi rend="italic">Thomas Moore</hi>
                     Chancellor of England seemes to agree, who would not have lesse than ten, nor
                     more than 16 children in one familie: as if he might commaund nature. And
                     although that <hi rend="italic">Phidon</hi> law-giuer to the <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> Corinthians did seeme to foresee it more wisely, forbidding
                     expresly to build any more in Corinth (as they made a defence not to build in
                     the suburbs of Paris, by the kings Edict in the yeare 1558,) yet the subiects
                     multiplying they must either erect a new<note place="marg" anchored="true">It is iniurious to
                        tye a citie to a certaine number.</note> Colonie, or banish them
                     iniuriously. But in my opinion they erre much which doubt ofscarcitie by the
                     multitude of children and citisens, when as no cities are more rich nor more
                     famous in arts and disciplines than those which abound most with citisens. It
                     is indeed lesse to feare that by reason of so great a multitude of citisens
                     there will be deuisions, for that there is nothing that doth keepe a citie more
                     free from mutinies and<note place="marg" anchored="true">Great cities are lesse subiect to
                        seditions than others.</note> factions than the multitude of citisens, for
                     that there are many which be as a meane betwixt the rich and the poore, the
                     good and the wicked, the wise and the simple, and <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> artificers and noblemen, which may recoucile these extremes
                     when they disagree: and there is nothing more dangerous than to have the
                     subiects divided into two factions without a meane, the which doth vsually fall
                     out in cities where there are but few citisens. Laying aside therefore this
                     opinion of equalitie in a Commonweale alreadie framed, rauishing and taking
                     away another mans goods, whereas they should preserue to every man his owne,
                     according unto the law of nature; and reiecting also them that would limit the
                     number of the citisens, we will maintaine that this deuision of portions ought
                     not to be allowed but in the framing of a new Commonweale in a conquered<note place="marg" anchored="true">The manner how to diuide a conquered citie.</note> countrie:
                     the which diuision should be made by families, and not by the powle, reseruing
                     alwaies some prerogative for one of the familie, and some right for the elder
                     in <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> euerie house, according to the law of God;
                     who doth shew vs with his finger what course to take, for hauing chosen the
                     tribe of <hi rend="italic">Leui</hi> to giue him the right of the elder aboue
                     the other twelue, he gaue them no lands but only houses in cities, appointing
                     them the tenth of every tribe (which was twelue tenths) without any labour, the
                     which was twise as much at the least as any tribe had, all things deducted. And
                     among the Leuites the right of the elder was reserued to the house of <hi rend="italic">Aaron,</hi> which had the tenth of the Leuites, and all the
                     oblations and first fruites: and to every priuat house he assigned<note place="marg" anchored="true">Deuision of land by the law of God.</note> twise as much of the
                     goods and lands unto the elder as to any other of the <pb n="572" facs="288"/>
                     heires, excluding the daughters wholie from the succession, but for want of
                     males in <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> the same degree, whereby we may iudge
                     that the law of God hath directly reiected all equalitie, giuing to one more
                     than to another: and yet he hath kept among the twelue tribes, except that of
                        <hi rend="italic">Leui,</hi> an equall deuision of inheritances; and among
                     the yongers an equall deuision of the succession, except the right of the
                     elder, the which was not of two third parts, nor of foure five parts, nor of
                     all; but of the halfe, to the end that such inequalitie should not be the cause
                     of the great wealth of some few subiects, and the extreame pouertie of an
                     infinit number: which is the occasion of murthers among brethren, of diuisions
                     in families, and of mutinies and civill wars among subiects. And to the end the
                     diuisions thus made may remaine indifferent, there must not be any prohibition
                     of alienation, either in a mans life, or by testament; as it is used in some
                     places, if <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> we will obserue the law of God,
                     which ordaines, That all successions sold, shall returne the fiftieth yeare to
                     the house, familie, or tribe, from the which it was sold: whereby the poore
                     that are afflicted, and forced to sell to supply their necessities, shall haue
                     means to sell the fruits and reuenewes of their lands to the fiftieth yeare,
                     the which shall returne afterwards to them or to their heires: ill husbands
                     shall be forced to live in penurie, and the couetousnesse of the rich shall be
                     preuented.</p><p>As for abolition of debts, it was a thing of a daungerous consequence, as it is
                     said, not<note place="marg" anchored="true">Abolition of debts pernitious.</note> so much for
                     the losse of the creditor (the which is of no great moment, when the question
                     is of the publike state) as for that it opens a way for the breach of faith in
                     lawfull conuentions, and giues occasions to mutines to trouble the state,
                     hoping still to have <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> abolition of debts, or at
                     the least an abatement of interests which have bene long due, reducing them to
                     the five and twentieth penie: the which hath bene obserued in Venice. We see by
                     the law of God, that debts are not cut off, but it giues the debtor respight
                     the seuenth yeare, and suspends the debt. But the true meanes to preuent
                     vsurers to ease the poore for euer, and to maintaine lawfull contracts, is to
                     obserue the law of God, which hath defended all kinds of vsuries among the
                     subiects: For the law were<note place="marg" anchored="true">Vsurie must bee cut off.</note>
                     vniust in regard of straungers, if it were lawfull for them to deliver out
                     money upon interest unto the subiect, from whome he should draw his whole
                     estate, if the subiect might not vse the like prerogative unto straungers. This
                     law hath bene alwaies much esteemed of all lawgiuers, and of the greatest
                     Polititians, that is to say, of <hi rend="italic">Solon, Licurgus,</hi>

                     <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Plato, Aristotle,</hi> and euen the ten commissionars deputed
                     to reforme the customes of Rome, and to make choyce of the most profitable
                     lawes, would not allow aboue one in the hundred for interest; the which they
                     called <hi rend="italic">Vnciarium,</hi> for that the vsurie of<note place="marg" anchored="true"><hi rend="italic">Tacit. lib.</hi> 5. <hi rend="italic">Pest. lib.</hi>
                        19.</note> euerie moneth came but to an ounce, which was the twelfth part of
                     the hundreth crowne which had bene borrowed, and the vsurer which exacted any
                     more, was condemned to restore foure fold: esteeming the vsurer (as <hi rend="italic">Cato</hi> said) worse than a theefe, which was condemned but
                     in the double. The same law was afterwards published<note place="marg" anchored="true">An
                        vsurer esteemed worse than a theefe.</note> anew at the request of the
                     Tribune <hi rend="italic">Duilius</hi> in the yeare of the foundation of Rome
                     396: and ten yeres after <hi rend="italic">Torquatus</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Plautius</hi> being Consuls, it was reduced to halfe an ounce in the
                     moneth, and a halfe penie in the hundred: so as it did not equall the
                        <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> principall but in two hundred yeares. But
                     the yeare following vsurie was quite forbidden<note place="marg" anchored="true">Vsurie
                        forbidden in Rome.</note> by the law Genutia, for the dayly seditions which
                     happened by the contempt of those lawes of vsurie: for what moderation soeuer
                     you make of vsurie, if it bee any thing tollerated it will soone encrease. And
                     those which maintaine under a color of religion, That moderat vsurie or rents,
                     after foure or five in the hundred, are honest and iust, for that the debtor
                     reapes more profit than the creditor, abuse the word of God, which doth
                     expresly forbid it. For although some would take light interest for the good of
                     the debtor, yet many would abuse it. For euen <pb n="573" facs="288"/> as a
                     hatchet at the first makes but a little rift, but in the end breakes all in
                     sunder: so the <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> sufferance of vnlawfull things,
                     how small soeuer, growes in the end to all impunitie: as they which haue
                     forbidden vsurie among Christians, and yet have allowed it for the church and
                     hospitals; and some also have found it convenient for the Commonweale and the
                     treasure; but there is nothing that giues the subiect more occasion to breake a
                     law, than to defend a thing, and tollerat it with some exceptions. The which is
                     an ordinarie fault among princes and prelats, seeking to exempt and free
                     themselves from those things which are forbidden to the subiect: &amp; who
                     would find that bad in particular, which is publikely allowed? And for that all
                     defences in matter of lawes are vnprofitable<note place="marg" anchored="true">Laws are
                        vnprofitable without penalties.</note> without some punishment, the which
                     are not regarded if they be not duly executed, therefore the law Genutia being
                     ill executed, was by little and little neglected.<milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> And therefore in England they have prouided, that when as any edict was
                     made, they presently appointed a Magistrat or Commissarie, to see the law
                     obserued, who continued in that charge vntill the law were disanulled. But the
                     couetousnesse of vsurers did so exceed, as they lent after twentie foure in the
                     hundred, vntill that the law Gabinia did moderat the greatest interest, at
                     twelue in the hundred, vnlesse it were in venturing at sea, whereas the
                     creditor tooke upon him the hazard: But this law was ill executed in the
                     prouinces, whereas they did take fortie eight in the hundred for a yeare, For
                     the extreame necessitie of him that borrowes, and the insatiable couetousnesse
                     of him that lends, will alwayes find a thousand deuises to defraud the law. The
                     punishment of vsurie was verie seuere in the Commonweale of the Candiots: and
                     therefore hee that <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> would borrow seemes as if
                     he would take it violently from the creditor: so as if the debtor did not pay
                     the intrest, which they could not recover by law, he was accused as a theefe
                     and robber: the which was but a grosse shift, in regard of their sales they
                     make at this day, the Notarie putting in this cause, <hi rend="italic">And the
                        rest in money.</hi> It is true, that at the first councell of Nice, the
                     bishops procured the emperour to forbid vsurie in money and fruits: the which
                     in regard of fruits, were so much and halfe so much more: that is to say,
                     fiftie for a hundred. But it was not obserued, especially for fruits, whereas
                     he that borrowes in a time of dearth is glad to pay it againe and halfe as much
                     more after haruest. Wherein it seemes there is great reason, for hee that lends
                     might have gained <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">Vsurie in fruits seemes tollerable</note> more if he had
                     sold it in a time of scarcitie, as they do commonly. Besides there is nothing
                     deerer than that which nourisheth, nor any thing more necessarie. And
                        therefore<note place="marg" anchored="true">Nothing deerer or more necessarie than that
                        which nourisheth.</note> the emperour <hi rend="italic">Iustinian</hi>
                     hauing rated vsurie for the countrey man at foure in the hundred in money, he
                     decreed, They should pay but twelue in the hundred in fruits, and not fiftie in
                     the hundred as had bene formerly vsed. <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> of Molins
                     had no cause to seeke to correct the Greeke and Latine text of the law, against
                     the truth of all copies, that hee might defend the edict of <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the twelfth, and the decrees of the court of parliament, which
                     made equall the interest in fruits and money: but the difference is great
                     betwixt the one and the other: for by <hi rend="italic">Iustinians</hi> law,
                     the poore labourer reaped great profit, being freed for thirteen bushels of
                     corne after haruest, for twelue <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> which he had
                     borrowed in a time of death: and yet by this correction which Molins giues, he
                     should be freed for a third part of a bushell, the which is verie absurd;
                     seeing that before <hi rend="italic">Iustinians</hi> decree, it was lawfull to
                     take fiftie in the hundred for fruits. It is farre better to relie upon the law
                     of God, which doth absolutely forbid vsurie, and the creditors good deeds shall
                     be more meritorious and more honourable to lend without<note place="marg" anchored="true">A
                        meritorious deed to lend without vsurie.</note> profit, than to receiue of
                     the poore laborer, in the qualitie of vsurie, a handfull of corne, for so great
                     and necessarie a good turne. Therefore <hi rend="italic">Nehemias</hi> (after
                     the peoples returne from captiuitie) did forbid them to take any more vsurie,
                     as they had done before taking twelue in the hundred, as well in money as in
                     fruits: and according to this example <pb n="574" facs="289"/> the decree of
                     Nice was made: but after that <hi rend="italic">Calixtus</hi> the 3, &amp; <hi rend="italic">Martin</hi> the 5, popes,<milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> had
                     giuen way to rents &amp; annuities, the which were little before that time in
                     vse, the interest hath growne so high, as the vsurie limited by <hi rend="italic">Iustinian,</hi> &amp; partly practised by the Cantons of the
                     Swissers, is farre more easie and more supportable, although the laws of
                     Fraunce and Venice do not allow any man to demaund aboue five yeares arrerages
                     past: For this sufferance of interest, without interest hath growne to be a
                     law, wherby the vsurers doe sucke the blood of the poore with all impunitie,
                     especially in sea towns, where there is a common bourse or banke; as at Genes,
                     where there are some worth foure or five hundred thousand duckets, others aboue
                     a million, as <hi rend="italic">Adam Centenier,</hi> &amp; they say that <hi rend="italic">Thomas Marin</hi> hath twise as much. So as the marchant for
                     the sweetnes<note place="marg" anchored="true">Annuities worse than interest.</note> of gaine
                     giues over his traffique, the artificer scornes his shop, the labourer leaues
                     his <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> labour, the shepheard his flocke, and the
                     noble man sels his land of inheritance, to make fortie or fiftie pounds a yeare
                     rent in annuities, in stead often pounds a yeare in fee simple land. Then
                     afterwards when as the rents faile, and the money is spent, as they know which
                     know not any other good meanes to live, giue themselves to theeuing, or to stir
                     up seditions a<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>d civill warres, that they might robbe
                     secretly: the which is the more to be feared, when as one of the estates of the
                     Commonweale, and the least in force and number, hath in a manner as much wealth
                     as all the rest; as it hath beene seene heretofore in the state of the Church:
                     whereas the hundred part of the subiects in the Westerne Commonweales, making
                     the third estate, had the tythes of what nature soeuer, and against the lawes
                     of the ptimitiue Church (as the Popes themselves confesse) and <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> have seized upon testamentarie legacies, as well mouables as
                     immouables, Dutchies<note place="marg" anchored="true">The Clergy enriched, and others made
                        poor.</note> Counties, Baronies, Lordships, Castles, houses both within and
                     without Townes, rents of all sorts, and bonds made freely; and yet they tooke
                     successions of all sides: they sold, exchaunged, purchased, and imploied the
                     reuenewes of their benifices for other acquisitions; and all without taxe,
                     subsidie, or any charge, euen in those places whereas the taxes are personall.
                     So as it was necessarie to enioyne the Cleargie to put away such land as had
                     bene left unto the church within a certaine time, uppon paine of confiscation:
                     as by a law made in England by king <hi rend="italic">Edward</hi> the first,
                     which did forbid all church men to purchase any land; as it appeareth in <hi rend="italic">Magna Carta:</hi> the which hath beene since<note place="marg" anchored="true">Clergy men forbidden to purchase lands.</note> renewed by the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift in Flanders, upon paine of confiscation:
                     the <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> which seemes to have bene forbidden in old
                     time. For we find that earles of Flanders have bene heirs unto priests: which
                     custome was abolished by pope <hi rend="italic">Vrbin</hi> the fift. For the
                     same reason the parliament at Paris did prohibit the Chartrens and Celestines
                     of Paris, to purchase any more, against the opinion of the abbat of Palerme.
                     Yet these defences were grounded upon the chapter, <hi rend="italic">Nuper de
                        decimis.</hi> And at Venice it hath bene enacted, and church men were
                     commanded to dispossesse themselves of all lands, prohibiting to leaue any
                     legacie to a Cleargie man, nor to make a will by the mouth or writing of a
                     cleargie man. And by a law made at the request of the states of Otleans, the
                     twentie seuenth article, all cleargie men are forbidden to receiue a testament
                     or last wil, in the which any thing is giuen him (the which is verie ill
                     executed) for the abuses <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">In old time every man was forced to leaue something unto the
                        church.</note> that were committed. Not a hundred yeares since within this
                     realme, they would not have laid any dead bodie in holy buriall, if hee had not
                     bequeathed some legacie unto the church; so as they tooke out a commission from
                     the officiall directed to the first priest of the place: who taking a view of
                     his goods that had died intestat, bequethed what he pleased unto the church in
                     his name that was dead▪ the which was reproued by two decrees of the parliament
                     of Paris, one in the yeare 1388, and the other in the yeare 1401. I have also a
                     declaration drawne out of the Treasure of France, by the which the twentie
                     barrons of Normandy named in the act, dated in the yere 1202, <pb n="575" facs="289"/> declare unto <hi rend="italic">Philip Augustus,</hi> That the
                     goods of him that dies without making a will,<milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/>
                     belonged unto him, hauing laine three dayes sicke before his death: and by the
                     confirmation of the priuileges of Rochell, graunted by <hi rend="italic">Richard</hi> king of England and earle of Poitou, it is said, That the
                     goods of the Rochelois should not bee confiscat, although<note place="marg" anchored="true">The
                        anntient rights o<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> the duke of Nor<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>andie and earles of Poitou.</note> they died
                     intestat: the which was also common in Spaine, vntill the ordinance made by <hi rend="italic">Ferdinand</hi> in the yere 1392, bearing these words, <hi rend="italic">Que no sellauen quintos da los que mueren sin fazer testamento
                        dexando hijos o parientes dentro del quarto grado que pueden hauer &amp;
                        heredar sus bienes, vz.</hi> The fift shal not be leuied of those which die
                     intestat, so as they have any children, or kinsfolke within the fourth degree
                     fit to succeed. It is no wonder then if the clergy were rich, seeing that
                     euerie man was forced to make a wil &amp; to leaue the church a legacie, vnder
                     rigorous paines; being also straitly defended for many <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> yeares, not to alienat nor rent out the goods of the church,
                     upon paine of nullitie. By the commaundement of <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi>
                     the ninth a suruay was made of all the reuenewes of the church within this
                     realme, the which was found to amount to twelue hundred<note place="marg" anchored="true">The
                        reuenewes of he Clergy in France.</note> and thirtie thousand pounds
                     starling a yere rent, not comprehending the ordinarie and extraordinarie alms.
                     But <hi rend="italic">Allemont</hi> president of the accounts at Paris, made an
                     estimat, That of twelue parts of all the reuenewes of Fraunce, the Cleargie
                     enioyed seuen. And by the registers of the chamber of accompts it appeeres,
                     that within this realme there are twelue Archbishopricks, 104 Bishopriks, 540
                     Abbaies, and 27400 parishes or cures (taking every towne for a cure, and the
                     least village for one where there is a <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> parish)
                     besides Priories and begging friers. Their reuenues had been far greater if
                        Pope<note place="marg" anchored="true">The propertie of land is in vaine whereas the
                        vsufruit is perpetual</note>

                     <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> the 22 had not disanulled the decree of Pope <hi rend="italic">Nicholas,</hi> who had allowed all begging friers to enioy the
                     frutes of lands, and the Pope should have the proprietie, the which was a
                     grosse cunning to frustrate the vowes of pouertie▪ for that the propertie is
                     fruitlesse and in vaine, as the law saith, if the vsufruct were perpetuall, as
                     bodies and colledges be. I do not speake of the well imploying of their goods,
                     but I say that this great inequalitie (it may be) hath ministred occasion of
                     troubles and seditions against the<note place="marg" anchored="true">An occasion found out to
                        ruine the Cleargy.</note> Clergie, throughout all Europe, when as in shew
                     they made a cullour of religion: for if this occasion had not been, they had
                     found out some other, as they did in time of our predecessors against the
                     Templers and the Iewes; or else they would have required a <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> new deuision of lands, as <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the
                     Roman Tribune did for the people, pretending that there were but two thousand
                     men in Rome which possessed all, although they were numbred in all to be aboue
                     three hundred thousand; and those few did so increase in wealth, as <hi rend="italic">Marcus Crassus</hi> by a declaration of the Censors, was
                     esteemed to be worth sixe millions of crownes: and fiftie yeares after <hi rend="italic">Lentulus</hi> the high Priest was found to be worth ten
                     millions of crownes. The Romains laboured to preuent these inconueniences,
                     publishing many lawes touching the deuision of lands: among the which the law
                     Quintia and Apuleia, would have the conquered lands deuided among the
                        people,<note place="marg" anchored="true">The cause of seditions in Rome.</note> the which
                     if they had bin well executed, those seditions had bin preuented which so
                     troubled the Commonweale: but the mischiefe was, that the conquered lands were
                        <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> farmed out by favour to priuat men, with a
                     pretence of benefit to the Commonweale, upon condition to pay the tenth of
                     graine, and the fift of fr<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>tes, and some rent for the
                     pastures: yet this rent and other duties were not paied, for that great men
                     held them in other mens names: for which cause <hi rend="italic">Sextus
                        Titius</hi> the Tribune presented a request unto the people, to the end that
                     the receiuers of the reuenues might <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/> the arrerages that
                     were due, the which was granted, but being not well executed, it was a meanes
                     to present other requests unto the people, that the lands and reuenues of the
                     Commonweale which priuate men held without paying any thing, might be deuided
                     among the people: the which did greatly amaze the rich, and caused them to
                     suborne <hi rend="italic">Thorius</hi> the <pb n="576" facs="290"/> Tribune
                     under hand, That by his intercession unto the people the lands should remain
                        <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> still in their possessions, and the
                     arrerages should be paied unto the receiuers of the reuenues: which law they
                     caused afterwards to be abrogated, when as the magistrates themselves held the
                     lands, of the which they could not be dispossest, nor forced to pay without
                     great disturbance to the state. In the end the law Sempronia was published by
                     force, at the request of <hi rend="italic">Tiberius Gracchus,</hi> the which
                     differed from the law Licinia, by the which all men were forbidden (of what
                     estate or qualitie soeuer) to hold aboue five hundred acres of the Commonweales
                     land, a hundred kine, and five hundred sheepe and goates, and to forfeit the
                     ouerplus: but the law Sempronia spake of nothing but of the publike lands,
                     ordaining that every yeare there should be three Commissioners appointed by the
                     people to distribute unto the poore the surplusage of five hundred <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">Law<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> made for the distribution of
                        lands.</note> acres that should be found in any one familie: but the Tribune
                     was slaine the last day of the publication, in a sedition moued by the Nobles:
                     yet <hi rend="italic">Caius Gracchus</hi> his brother being Tribune of the
                     people ten yeres after, caused it to be put in execution, but he was slaine
                     also in the pursuite thereof, after whose death the Senate to pacifie the
                     people caused it to be executed against many. And to the end those lands should
                     not remaine waste, the poore wanting cattell and meanes to till it, it was
                     ordained that according unto the law Sempronia of <hi rend="italic">Tiberius
                        Gracchus,</hi> the treasure of king <hi rend="italic">Attalus</hi> (who had
                     made the people of Rome his heire) should be distributed among the poore, to
                     whom they had giuen part of the lands: by which meanes many of the poore were
                     prouided for. And to take away occasion of future seditions, they sent away
                     part of the <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> poorer sort into Colonies, to
                     whome they did distribute countries conqueted from the enemie. But there was
                     one article in the law of <hi rend="italic">C. Gracchus</hi> which was most
                     necessarie, and yet it was abrogated, Prohibiting the poore to sell or make
                     away those lands that were assigned unto them: for the rich seeing that the
                     poore had no meanes to entertaine those lands, redeemed them.</p><p>There was also another cause of this inequalitie of goods, which was by the
                        libertie<note place="marg" anchored="true">The testamentarie law the cause of
                        inequalitie.</note> that euerie one had to dispose freely of his goods, and
                     to whom he pleased, by the law of the twelue Tables. All other people, except
                     the Athenians (where <hi rend="italic">Solon</hi> first published this law) had
                     not free libertie to dispose of their lands. And <hi rend="italic">Licurgus</hi> hauing deuided the lands of the inhabitants of the citie into
                     seuen thousand parts (some say <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> more, others
                     say lesse) and the lands of the countrie into twelue thousand equall parts, he
                     did not suffer any one to dispose thereof; but contrariwise, to the end that in
                     processe of time the seuen thousand parts of inheritance might not be sold, or
                     diminished into many members, it was decreed, That the elder of the house, or
                     the next of kin should succeed to the whole inheritance; and, that he could not
                     have but one part of the seuen thousand; and he must be also a Spartaine borne.
                     Others were excluded from the succession, as <hi rend="italic">Plutarch</hi>
                     saith, speaking of king <hi rend="italic">Agesilaus,</hi> who in the beginning
                     was bred up straightly as a younger brother, for that hee was issued of a
                     younger house. This for a time did entertaine the 7000 families in equalitie,
                     vntill that one of the Ephores being incensed against his eldest sonne,
                     presented a request unto the Seigneurie,<milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> the
                     which passed for a law, by the which every man had libertie to dispose of his
                     goods by will. These testamentarie lawes being receiued in Greece, and
                     afterwards published in Rome, and incerted in the twelue tables, were the cause
                     of great alterations. But the people of the East and West might not dispose of
                     lands by testament: a custome which is yet obserued in some parts of France,
                     Germanie, and other nations<note place="marg" anchored="true">In Poland and many other parts of
                        the North, they may not dispose of lands by testament.</note> of the North.
                     And therefore <hi rend="italic">Tacitus</hi> writes, that the Germaines had no
                     vse of Testaments, the which many have vnaduisedly attributed to ignorance and
                     barbarisme. And euen in Polonia it is expresly forbidden by the lawes of the
                     two <hi rend="italic">Sigismonds,</hi> according <pb n="577" facs="290"/> vnto
                     the antient customes, to dispose of lands by testament. The Oxiles and
                        <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> the Phytales had a stricter custome,
                     forbidding them to pawne any lands. And by the custome of Amiens and other
                     customes of the Lowcountries of Flanders, no Nobleman might sell away their
                     seigneuries vntill they had solemnely sworne pouertie: the<note place="marg" anchored="true">In
                        some places noble men may not sell away their seigneuries.</note> which is
                     also strictly obserued in Spaine. We have also said before, that the law of God
                     did expresly defend all alienation of lands, either in a mans life or by
                     testament, reseruing the right of the elder in every familie, without any
                     difference of noble or villain, according to <hi rend="italic">Licurgus</hi>
                     law in his deuision of 7000 parts in Lacedemon: and those of Caux in Normandie,
                     as well the Gentlemen as others, do much better preserue the dignitie and
                     beautie of their antient houses and families, the which by this meanes are not
                     dismembred, and all the estate of the Commonweale in generall: the which is the
                        <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> more firme and stable being grounded upon
                     good houses and families, and as great and immoueable pillers, the which could
                     not support the burthen of a great building, if they were weake, although they
                     were many. And it seemes that the greatnes of France, Spaine, and England is
                     supported by great and noble families, and by corporations<note place="marg" anchored="true">Great kingdoms supported by noble families, especially in an Aristocratical
                        estate, but they are contrarie to a Popular estate, or to a Tyranny.</note>
                     and Colleges, the which being dismembred into peeces, will be the ruine of the
                     State. But this opinion is more probable than necessarie, vnlesse it be in an
                     Aristocraticall estate: for it is most certaine that in a Monarchie there is
                     nothing more to be feared than great men, and corporations, especially if it be
                     tyranicall. As for a popular estate which requires equalitie in all things, how
                     can it endure so great inequalitie in families,<milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/>
                     whereas some should have all, and others die of hunger: seeing that all the
                     seditions which have happened in Rome and in Greece have been grounded upon
                        this<note place="marg" anchored="true">Inequalitie main tained the estat<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> of Sparta.</note> point. There remaines an
                     Aristocratie where as the noble and great men are vnequall with the common
                     people, and in this case the right of the elder may mainetaine the estate, as
                     in the seigneurie of Sparta, whereas the seuen thousand parts equally divided
                     unto the elder of every familie, maintained the State: and as for the yonger
                     brethren, vertue aduanced them to offices and honors according to their merits:
                     and commonly they proued the most famous, hauing (as <hi rend="italic">Plutarch</hi> said) nothing to aduance them but their vertues. It was the
                     antient custome of the Gaules: and without doubt our Nobilitie would be much
                     more esteemed, if the prohibition of selling of their seigneuries <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> were dulie executed, according to the lawes and
                     ordinances of this realme, and of the Empire, where it is better obserued. The
                     like defences were made in Polonia, by the laws of <hi rend="italic">Albert,</hi> &amp; <hi rend="italic">Sigismond Augustus</hi> kings in the
                     yere 1495 &amp; 1538, &amp; by an edict<note place="marg" anchored="true">Laws prohibiting
                        noble men to <gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ell their seigneuries.</note> made by
                        <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi> duke of Brittaine, forbidding the common people
                     to purchase the seigneuries of noble men, upon paine of confiscation. And
                     although that <hi rend="italic">Lewis</hi> the 12 disanulled those defences in
                     the yeare 1505, yet king <hi rend="italic">Francis</hi> the first renewed the
                     Edict in the yeare 1535 under the same paine of confiscation. The meanes to
                     vnite the nobilitie<note place="marg" anchored="true">A meanes to vnite the gentry &amp; the
                        plebeians.</note> and the common people more strictly together, is to marrie
                     the yonger children of noble houses being poore (in an Aristocraticall estate)
                     with the Plebeians that are rich, as they did in Rome after the law Canuleia;
                     the which is practised at this day by the <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/>
                     Venetians, and almost in every Commonweale, whereas the nobilitie hath any
                     prerogative over the common people: the which is the surest way to maintaine
                     the nobilitie in wealth, honour, and dignitie. And yet it is necessarie to
                     moderat the dowries of women in what estate soeuer, least that meane houses be
                     not beggered to enrich the nobles: wherein the antient lawgiuers have been much
                     troubled to obserue this equalitie, and to prouide that ancient houses and
                     families might not be dismembred and ruined by the daughters. The law of God
                     would not allow the daughters to succeed if there were any brethren: and
                     although there were not any, yet the daughters that were heires were commanded
                     to marrie the next kinsman of that familie: to the end <pb n="578" facs="291"/>
                     saith the law, that the inheritance may not be drawne from the house by the
                        daughters.<milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> This law was obserued in Greece,
                     where as the next kinsman married the heire, neither might the daughter marrie
                     with any other. In Persia and Armenia the daughter had nothing of the house but
                     the moueables: a custome which is yet obserued in all<note place="marg" anchored="true">I<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> the East parts the daughters inherit <gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>o lands.</note> the East, and almost throughout all
                     Affrike, although that <hi rend="italic">Iustinian</hi> the Emperour, or rather
                        <hi rend="italic">Theodora</hi> his wife, hauing alwayes fauored her owne
                     sexe, reformed that custome of Armenia, terming it barbarous, not regarding the
                     intention of the antient lawgiuers. <hi rend="italic">Hippodamus</hi> lawgiuer
                     to the Milesians, would not frustrate the daughters of all succession, but he
                     ordained that the rich should marrie with the poore, wherein he did obserue the
                     equalitie of goods, and entertained loue betwixt the couples, and betwixt the
                     poore and the rich. It is most certaine that if the daughters be made equall
                        <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> with the sonnes in the right of succession,
                     families shall be soone dismembred: for commonly there are more women than men,
                     be it in Commonweales in generall, or in<note place="marg" anchored="true">The inequalitie of
                        goods grows, for that the daughters being heires are married to the
                        rich.</note> priuate families: the which was first verified at Athens, where
                     as the pluralitie of women gaue name unto the citie: and within these twentie
                     yeares at Venice, (whether comes a world of strangers) there was found upon a
                     suruaie two thousand women more than men: whether it be that they are not
                     subiect to the dangers of warre and trauell, or that nature is apter to produce
                     those things that are lesse perfect. And therefore <hi rend="italic">Aristotle</hi> said in his Politikes, That of five parts of inheritance the
                     women of Sparta held three, the which came by the permission of the
                     testamentarie law; and for this cause (saith he) they cōmanded absolutely ouer
                     their husbands, whom they called <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> Ladies. But
                     to preuent this inconuenience at Rome, <hi rend="italic">Voconius Saxa</hi> the
                     Tribune, by the persuasion of <hi rend="italic">Cato</hi> the Censor, presented
                     a request unto the people, the which passed<note place="marg" anchored="true">The law of
                        succession at Rome, d<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>frauded.</note> for a law,
                     whereby it was enacted, That the females should not succeed so long as there
                     were any male carrying the name, in what degree of consanguinitie soeuer he
                     were; and, that they might not have giuen them by testament aboue the fourth
                     part of the goods; nor more than the least of the Testators heires. This law
                     retained the antient families in their dignities, and the goods in some
                     equalitie, keeping women in some sort in awe: yet they found a meanes to
                     defraud it, by legacies and feofments made in trust to friends, with request to
                     restore the successions or legacies unto the women which could not recover them
                     by order of law not by petition, before <hi rend="italic">Augustus</hi> time;
                     who <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> following the pernitious counsell of <hi rend="italic">Trebatius,</hi> tooke an occasion to abrogate the law,
                     demanding a dispensation of the law Voconia of the Senat, for his wife <hi rend="italic">Liuia:</hi> so as this law being troden under foot, the Roman
                     citisens began to be slaues unto their wiues, who were their mistresses both in
                     name and effect. Then might you have seene women wearing two rich successions
                     at their eares, as <hi rend="italic">Seneca</hi> saith; and the daughter of a
                     Proconsull who did weare at one time in apparell and iewels the value of three
                     millions of crownes, the inequalitie of goods being then at the highest, after
                     which time the Roman empire declined still vntill it was wholie ruined. By the
                     antient custome of Marseilles it was not lawfull to giue aboue a hundred
                     crownes in marriage with a daughter, and five crownes in apparell. And by the
                     Statutes at Venice it is forbidden <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">A commendable law at Venic<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>.</note>
                     to giue aboue 1600 ducats to a noble mans daughter: and if a Gentleman of
                     Venice marrie a citisens daughter, he may not take aboue two thousand ducats;
                     nor the females succeed so long as there is any male of the familie: but in
                     truth this law is as ill obserued as that of king <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the 9, which forbids to giue unto a daughter in marriage<note place="marg" anchored="true">The law of Fraunce for the marriage of daughters.</note> aboue
                     a thousand pounds starling, and yet the ordinance of king <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the 5 doth giue no more unto the daughters of the house of
                     France. And although that <hi rend="italic">Elizabeth</hi> of France, daughter
                     to <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the faire were married unto the king of
                     England, yet had she but twelue hundred pounds starling to her dowrie. Some one
                     will say unto <pb n="579" facs="291"/> me, that it was very much, considering
                     the scarcetie of gold and siluer in those daies:<milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> but the difference also is very great betwixt a thousand pounds, and foure
                     hundred thousand crownes. It is true that she was the goodliest Princesse of
                     her age, and of the greatest house that was at that day. And if we will seeke
                     higher, we shall find in the law<note place="marg" anchored="true">The law of God for
                        dowries.</note> of God that the marriage of a daughter at the most was taxed
                     but at fiftie sicles, which make fower pounds starling of our money, in which
                     penaltie he was condemned that had seduced a virgin, whom also he was forced by
                     the law to bring home, if the father of the maiden so pleased: which makes me
                     beleeue that the antient custome of the Persians is likely, for that the
                     Commissioners deputed yearely to marrie the maids<note place="marg" anchored="true">The law of
                        Persia.</note> gaue the honestest and fairest to them that offred most, and
                     with that money they married them that were lesse esteemed (that none might be
                     vnprouided for) with this <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> caution to them that
                     married the deformed, Neuer to put away their wiues, but in restoring of their
                     dowries▪ by the which they prouided for the marriage of maids, the modestie of
                     wiues, the dignitie of husbands, and the publike honestie whereon wise
                     lawgiuers should have a speciall care, as <hi rend="italic">Plato</hi> had. For
                     to take from the daughters all meanes to prefer themselves according to their
                     qualities, were to giue occasion of a greater inconuenience. And it seemes that
                     the customes of Aniou and of Maine haue<note place="marg" anchored="true">Custome of
                        Aniou.</note> giuen them a third part in successions, of gentlemen in fee
                     simple, the which is left to the yonger males but for terme of life, to the end
                     the daughters should not be vnprouided for, hauing not meanes to aduance
                     themselves like unto the males: for the reformation <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> of which custome they have heretofore made great complaints:
                     the which might as well be done, as in the custome of <hi rend="italic">Mondidier,</hi> and in that of <hi rend="italic">Vendosme,</hi> (an antient
                     dependance of the countrie of Aniou, before that it was erected to a Countie or
                     a Duchie) where as a yonger brother of the house of Aniou, hauing taken his
                     elder brother prisoner, made him to change the custome of Aniou in regard of
                     the Chasteleine of <hi rend="italic">Vendosme,</hi> the which he had but for
                     terme of life. And although that in Brittaine by the decree of Cont <hi rend="italic">Geoffrie</hi> in the yeare 1181 the eldest in gentlemens
                     houses caried away all the succession, and maintained the yonger at his owne
                     pleasure: yet to preuent infinit inconueniences, <hi rend="italic">Arthur</hi>
                     the first duke of Brittanie enacted, That the yonger children should have a
                     third part of the succession for terme of life, as it is obserued <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> in the countrie of Caux, by a decree of the Parlament
                     at Rouen, the daughters portions being deducted. I have hitherto treated of
                     subiects only, but we must also take heed least that strangers set footing
                     within the realme, and purchase the goods of the naturall subiect: and
                     preuenting all idle vagabonds which desguise themselves like Egiptians, when as
                     in truth they are very theeves, whom all Magistrates and Gouernors are
                     commanded to expell out of the real me by a law made at the estates of
                     Orleance, as it was in like manner decreed in Spaine by <hi rend="italic">Ferdinand</hi> in the yeare 1492 in these words, <hi rend="italic">Que los
                        Egiptianos consennores salgan del Reyno dentro sessenta dias:</hi> That all
                     the Egiptians with their women shall depart out of the realme within threescore
                        <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> daies. This swarme of caterpillers do
                     multiplie in the Pyrenees, the Alps, the mountaines of Arabia, and other hillie
                     and barren places, and then come downe like wasps to cate the honie from the
                     bees. Thus in my opinion I have set downe briefly the fittest meanes to preuent
                     the extreme pouertie of the greatest part of the subiects, and the excessiue
                     wealth of a small number, leauing to discourse hereafter, If the lands
                     appointed for the seruice of the warre may be dismembred or sold. Let vs now
                     see if the goods of men condemned should be left unto their heires.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>