<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:stoa0023.stoa001.perseus-eng2:22.3.8-22.4.1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:stoa0023.stoa001.perseus-eng2:22.3.8-22.4.1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div xml:lang="lat" type="translation" n="urn:cts:latinLit:stoa0023.stoa001.perseus-eng2"><div type="textpart" subtype="book" n="22"><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="3"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="8"><p>After Ursulus’ death Julian found himself the object of the reproaches and curses of many men, and thinking that he could excuse himself for the unpardonable crime, he declared that the man had been put to death without his knowledge, alleging that his taking off was due to the anger of the soldiers, who remembered his words (which we have reported before<note type="footnote" resp="editor">xx. 11, 6.</note> ) when he saw the ruins of Amida.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="9"><p>From this it was clear that Julian was timorous, or that he did not know what was fitting, when he put Arbitio, who was always untrustworthy and excessively haughty, in charge of these inquisitions, while the others, including the officers of the legions, were <pb n="v2.p.197"/> present merely for show; for Arbitio was a man whom he knew above all others to be a threat to his own safety,<note type="footnote" resp="editor">Cf. xv. 2, 4.</note> as was to be expected of one who had taken a valiant part in the victories of the civil wars.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="10"><p>But, although these acts which I have mentioned displeased even Julian’s supporters, yet those which follow were executed with proper vigour and severity.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="11"><p>For Apodemius, of the imperial secret service, who, as we have said,<note type="footnote" resp="editor">Cf. xv. 5, 8; xiv. 11, 19.</note> showed unbridled eagerness for the death of Silvanus and Gallus, was burned alive, as well as Paulus the notary, surnamed Catena,<note type="footnote" resp="editor">The Chain, or Fetter; cf. xiv. 5, 6.</note> a man to be mentioned by many with groans, who thus met the fate which was to have been hoped for.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="12"><p>Eusebius besides, who had been made Constantius’ grand chamberlain, a man full of pride and cruelty, was condemned to death by the judges. This man, who had been raised from the lowest station to a position which enabled him almost to give orders like those of the emperor himself,<note type="footnote" resp="editor">See xviii. 4, 3, and Introd., p. xxxvi.</note> and in consequence had become intolerable, Adrastia, the judge of human acts,<note type="footnote" resp="editor">Cf. xiv. 11, 25.</note> had plucked by the ear (as the saying is) and warned him to live with more restraint; and when he demurred, she threw him headlong, as if from a lofty cliff.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="4"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="1"><p>After this the emperor turned his attention to the palace attendants, and dismissed all who belonged to that class or could be included in it, but not <pb n="v2.p.199"/> like a philosopher claiming to research into truth.</p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>