<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1348.abo011.perseus-eng2:81-note</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1348.abo011.perseus-eng2:81-note</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div xml:lang="eng" type="translation" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1348.abo011.perseus-eng2"><div type="textpart" n="81" subtype="chapter"><p>Casar had warning given him of his fate by indubitable omens. A few months
					before, when the colonists settled at <placeName key="perseus,Capua">Capua</placeName>, by virtue of the Julian law, were demolishing some old
					sepulchres, in building countryhouses, and were the more eager at the work,
					because they discovered certain vessels of antique workmanship, a tablet of
					brass was found in a tomb, in which Capys, the founder of <placeName key="perseus,Capua">Capua</placeName>, was said to have been buried, with an
					inscription in the Greek language to this effect: "Whenever the bones of Capys
					come to be discovered, a descendant of Iulus will be slain by the hands of his
					kinsmen, and his death revenged by fearful disasters throughout <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>." Lest any person should regard this
					anecdote as a fabulous or silly invention, it was circulated upon the authority
					of Caius Balbus, an intimate friend of Caesar's. A few days likewise before his
					death, he was informed that the horses, which, upon his crossing the Rubicon, he
					had consecrated, and turned loose to graze without a keeper, abstained entirely
					from eating, and shed floods of tears. The soothsayer Spurinna, observing
					certain ominous appearances in a sacrifice which he was offering, advised him to
					beware of some danger, which threatened to befall him before the ides of March
					were past. The day before the ides, birds of various kinds from a neighbouring
					grove, pursuing a wren which flew into Pompey's senate-house,<note anchored="true">This senate-house stood in that part of the <placeName key="tgn,7006964">Campus Martius</placeName> which is now the Campo di
						Fiore, and was attached by Pompey, "spoliis Orientis Onustus," to the
						magnificent theatre, which he built A.U.C. 698, in his second consulship.
						His statue, at the foot of which Caesar fell, as Plutarch tells us, was
						placed in it. We shall find that Augustus caused it to be removed.</note>
					with a sprig of laurel in its beak, tore it in pieces. Also, in the night on
					which the day of his murder dawned, he dreamt at one time that he was soaring
					above the clouds, and, at another, that he had joined hands with <placeName key="tgn,2019952">Jupiter</placeName>. His wife Calpurnia fancied in her
					sleep that the pediment of the house was falling down, and her husband stabbed
					on her bosom; immediately upon which the chamber doors flew open. On account of
					these omens, as well as his infirm health, he was in some doubt whether he
					should not remain at home, and defer to some other opportunity the business
					which he intended to propose to the senate; but Decimus Brutus advising him not
					to disappoint the senators, who were numerously assembled, and waited his
					coming, he was prevailed upon to go, and accordingly set forward about the fifth
					hour. In his way, some person having thrust into his hand a paper, warning him
					against the plot, he mixed it with some other documents which he held in his
					left hand, intending to read it at leisure. Victim after victim was slain,
					without any favourable appearances in the entrails; but still, disregarding all
					omens, he entered the senate-house, laughing at Spurinna as a false prophet,
					because the ides of March were come without any mischief having befallen him. To
					which the soothsayer replied, "They are come, indeed, but not past."</p></div><div type="textpart" n="82" subtype="chapter"><p>When he had taken his seat, the conspirators stood round him, under colour of
					paying their compliments; and immediately Tullius Cimber, who had engaged to
					commence the assault, advancing nearer than the rest, as if he had some favour
					to request, <placeName key="tgn,2073974">Casar</placeName> made signs that he
					should defer his petition to some other time. Tullius immediately seized him by
					the toga, on both shoulders; at which <placeName key="tgn,2073974">Casar</placeName> crying out, "Violence is meant!" one of the Cassii
					wounded him a little below the throat. Caesar seized him by the arm, and ran it
					through with his style;<note anchored="true">The <foreign xml:lang="lat">stylus</foreign>, or <foreign xml:lang="lat">graphium</foreign>, was an
						iron pen, broad at one end, with a sharp point at the other, used for
						writing upon waxen tables, the leaves or bark of trees, plates of brass, or
						lead, etc. For writing upon paper or parchment, the Romans employed a reed,
						sharpened and split in the point like our pens, called <foreign xml:lang="lat">calamus</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="lat">arundo</foreign>, or <foreign xml:lang="lat">canna</foreign>. This they
						dipped in the black liquor emitted by the cuttle fish, which served for
						ink.</note> and endeavouring to rush forward, was stopped by another wound.
					Finding himself now attacked on all hands with naked poniards, he wrapped the
						toga<note anchored="true">It was customary among the ancients, in great
						extremities to shroud the face. in order to conceal any symptoms of horror
						or alarm which the countenance might express. The skirt of the toga was
						drawn round the lower extremities, that there might be no exposure in
						falling, as the Romans, at this period, wore no covering for the thighs and
						legs.</note> about his head, and at the same moment drew the skirt round his
					legs with his left hand, that he might fall more decently with the lower part of
					his body covered.He was stabbed with three and twenty wounds, uttering a groan
					only, but no cry, at the first wound; although some authors relate, that when
					Marcus <placeName key="tgn,2037959">Brutus</placeName> fell upon him, he
					exclaimed, "What! art thou, too, one of them!" Thou, my son!" <note anchored="true">Caesar's dying apostrophe to <placeName key="tgn,2037959">Brutus</placeName> is represented in all the editions of Suetonius as
						uttered in Greek, but with some variations. The words, as here translated,
						are <foreign xml:lang="grc">καὶ σὺ εἶ ἐκείνων; καὶ σὺ</foreign>. The Salmasian manuscript omits the latter clause.
						Some commentators suppose that the words "my son," vere not merely
						expressive of the difference of age, or former familiarity between them, but
						an avowal that Brutus was the fruit of the connection between <placeName key="tgn,2008628">Julius</placeName> and Servilia, mentioned before [see
						p. 40]. But it appears very improbable that Caesar, who had never before
						acknowledged <placeName key="tgn,2037959">Brutus</placeName> to be his son,
						should make so unnecessary an avowal, at the moment of his death.
						Exclusively of this objection, the apostrophe seems too verbose, both for
						the suddenness and urgency of the occasion. But this is nor all. Can we
						suppose that Caesar, though a perfect master of Greek, would at such a time
						have expressed himself in that language, rather than in Latin, his familiar
						tongue, and in which he spoke with peculiar elegance? Upon the whole, the
						probability is, that the words uttered by <placeName key="tgn,2073974">Casar</placeName> were, <foreign xml:lang="lat">Et tu Brute!</foreign>
						which, while equally expressive of astonishment with the other version, and
						even of tenderness, are both more natural, and more emphatic.</note> The
					whole assembly instantly dispersing, he lay for some time after he expired,
					until three of his slaves laid the body on a litter, and carried it home, with
					one arm hanging down over the side. Among so many wounds, there was none that
					was mortal, in the opinion of the surgeon Antistius, except the second, which he
					received in the breast. The conspirators meant to drag his body into the
						<placeName key="tgn,1130786">Tiber</placeName> as soon.as they had killed
					him; to confiscate his estate, and rescind all his enactments; but they were
					deterred by fear of Mark Antony, and Lepidus, Caesar's master of the horse, and
					abandoned their intentions.</p></div><div type="textpart" n="83" subtype="chapter"><p>At the instance of Lucius Piso, his fatherin-law, his will was opened and read in
					Mark Antony's house. He had made it on the ides (13th) of the preceding
					September, at his Lavica villa, and committed it to the custody of the chief of
					the Vestal Virgins. Quintus Tubero informs us, that in all the wills he had
					signed, from the time of his first consulship to the breaking out of. the civil
					war, Cneius Pompey was appointed his heir, and that this had been publicly
					notified to the army. But in his last will, he named three heirs, the grandsons
					of his sisters; namely, Caius Octavius for three fourths of his estate, and
					Lucius Pinarius and Quintus Pedius for the remaining fourth. Other heirs [in
					remainder] were named at the close of the will, in which he also adopted Caius
					Octavius, who was to assume his name, into his family; and nominated most of
					those who were concerned in his death among the guardians of his son, if he
					should have any; as well as Decimus Brutus amongst his heirs of the second
					order. He bequeathed to the Roman people his gardens near the <placeName key="tgn,1130786">Tiber</placeName>, and three hundred sesterces each
					man.</p></div><div type="textpart" n="84" subtype="chapter"><p>Notice of his funeral having been solemnly proclaimed, a pile was erected in the
						<placeName key="tgn,7006964">Campus Martius</placeName>, near the tomb of
					his daughter Julia; and before the Rostra was placed a gilded tabernacle, on the
					model of the temple of Venus Genitrix; within which was an ivory bed, covered
					with purple and cloth of gold. At the head was a trophy, with the
					[blood-stained] robe in which he was slain. It being considered that the whole
					day would not suffice for carrying the funeral oblations in solemn procession
					before the corpse, directions were given for every one, without regard to order,
					to carry them from the city into the <placeName key="tgn,7006964">Campus
						Martius</placeName>, by what way they pleased. To raise pity and indignation
					for his murder, in the plays acted at the funeral, a passage was sung from
					Pacuvius's tragedy, entitled, <title>The Trial for Arms</title>: <quote xml:lang="eng"><l>That ever I, unhappy man, should save</l><l>Wretches, who thus have brought me to the grave?</l></quote>
					<note anchored="true"><quote xml:lang="lat"><l>Men' me servasse, it essent qui me
							perderent?</l></quote></note> And some lines also from Attilius's tragedy of " Electra," to the same
					effect. Instead of a funeral panegyric, the consul Antony ordered a herald to
					proclaim to the people the decree of the senate, in which they had bestowed upon
					him all honours, divine and human; with the oath by which they had engaged
					themselves for the defence of his person; and to these he added only a few words
					of his own. The magistrates and others who had formerly filled the highest
					offices, carried the bier from the Rostra into the Forum. While some proposed
					that the body should be burnt in the sanctuary of the temple of Jupiter
					Capitolinus, and others in Pompey's senate-house; on a sudden, two men, with
					swords by their sides, and spears in their hands, set fire to the bier with
					lighted torches. The throng around immediately heaped upon it dry faggots, the
					tribunals and benches of the adjoining courts, and whatever else came to hand.
					Then the musicians and players stripped off the dresses they wore on the present
					occasion, taken from the wardrobe of his triumph at spectacles, rent them, and
					threw them into the flames. The legionaries, also, of his veteran bands, cast in
					their armour, which they had put on in honour of his funeral. Most of the ladies
					did the same by their ornaments, with the <foreign xml:lang="lat">bullae</foreign>,<note anchored="true">The <foreign xml:lang="lat">Bulla</foreign>, generally made of gold, was a hollow globe, which boys
						wore upon their breast, pendant from a string or ribbon put round the neck.
						The sons of freedmen and poor citizens used globes of leather. </note> and
					mantles of their children. In this public mourning there joined a multitude of
					foreigners, expressing their sorrow according to the fashion of their respective
					countries; but especially the Jews, <note anchored="true">Josephus frequently
						mentions the benefits conferred on his countrymen by Julius Caesar. <bibl n="J. AJ 14.14">Anti. Jud. xiv. 14, 15, 16.</bibl>
					</note> who for several nights together frequented the spot where the body was
					burnt.</p></div><div type="textpart" n="85" subtype="chapter"><p>The populace ran from the funeral, with torches in their hands, to the houses of
					Brutus and Cassius, and were repelled with difficulty. Going in quest of
					Cornelius Cinna, who had in a speech, the day before, reflected severely upon
					Caesar, and mistaking for him Helvius Cinna, who happened to fall into their
					hands, they murdered the latter, and carried his head about the city on the
					point of a spear. They afterwards erected in the Forum a column of Numidian
					marble, formed of one stone nearly twenty feet high, and inscribed upon it these
					words, TO THE FATHER OF HIS COUNTRY. At this column they continued for a long
					time to offer sacrifices, make vows, and decide controversies, in which they
					swore by Caesar.</p></div><div type="textpart" n="86" subtype="chapter"><p>Some of Caesar's friends entertained a suspicion, that he neither desired nor
					cared to live any longer, on account of his declining health; and for that
					reason slighted all the omens of religion, and the warnings of his friends.
					Others are of opinion, that thinking himself secure in the late decree of the
					senate, and their oaths, he dismissed his Spanish guards who attended him with
					drawn swords. Others again suppose, that he chose rather to face at once the
					dangers which threatened him on all sides, than to be for ever on the watch
					against them. Some tell us that he used to say, the commonwealth was more
					interested in the safety of his person than himself: for that he had for some
					time been satiated with power and glory; but that the commonwealth, if anything
					should befall him, would have no rest, and, involved in another civil war, would
					be in a worse state than before.</p></div><div type="textpart" n="87" subtype="chapter"><p>This, however, was generally admitted, that his death was in many respects such
					as he would have chosen. For, upon reading the account delivered by Xenophon,
					how Cyrus in his last illness gave instructions respecting his funeral, Caesar
					deprecated a lingering death, and wished that his own might be sudden and
					speedy. And the day before he died, the conversation at supper, in the house of
					Marcus Lepidus, turning upon. what was the most eligible way of dying, he gave
					his opinion in favour of a death that is sudden and_unagx pected.</p></div><div type="textpart" n="88" subtype="chapter"><p>He died in the fifty-sixth year of his age, and was ranked amongst the Gods, not
					only by a formal decree, but in the belief of the vulgar. For during the first
					games which Augustus, his heir, consecrated to his memory, a comet blazed for
					seven days together, rising always about eleven o'clock; and it was supposed to
					be the soul of Caesar, now received into heaven: for which reason, likewise, he
					is represented on his statue with a star on his brow. The senate-house in which
					he was slain, was ordered to be shut up, <note anchored="true">Appian informs us
						that it was burnt by the people in their fury, <bibl n="App. BC 2.20.147">B.
							C. xi. p. 521</bibl>.</note> and a decree made that the ides of March
					should be called parricidal, and the senate should never more assemble on that
					day.</p></div><div type="textpart" n="89" subtype="chapter"><p>Scarcely any of those who were accessory to his murder, survived him more than
					three years, or died a natural death.<note anchored="true">Suetonius
						particularly refers to the conspirators, who perished at the battle of
							<placeName key="tgn,7010789">Philippi</placeName>, or in the three years
						which intervened. The survivors were included in the reconciliation of
						Augustus, Antony, and Pompey, A.U.C. 715. </note> They were all condemned by
					the senate: some were taken off by one accident, some by another. Part of them
					perished at sea, others fell in battle; and some slew themselves with the same
					poniard with which they had stabbed Caesar. <note anchored="true">Suetonius
						alludes to Brutus and Cassius, of whom this is related by Plutarch and Dio.
					</note>
				</p></div><div type="textpart" n="note" subtype="chapter"><head>Remarks on Julius Caesar</head><p>The termination of the civil war between Caesar and Pompey forms a new epoch in
					the Roman History, at which a Republic, which had subsisted with unrivalled
					glory during a period of about four hundred and sixty years, relapsed into a
					state of despotism, whence it never more could emerge. So sudden a transition
					from prosperity to the ruin of public freedom, without the intervention of any
					foreign enemy, excites a reasonable conjecture, that the constitution in which
					it could take place, however vigorous in appearance, must have lost that
					soundness of political health which had enabled it to endure through so many
					ages. A short view of its preceding state, and of that in which it was at the
					time of the revolution now mentioned, will best ascertain the foundation of such
					a conjecture.</p><p>Though the Romans, upon the expulsion of Tarquin, made an essential change in the
					political form of the state, they did not carry their detestation of regal
					authority so far as to abolish the religious institutions of Numa Pompilius, the
					second of their kings, according to which, the priesthood, with all the
					influence annexed to that order, was placed in the hands of the aristocracy. By
					this wise policy a restraint was put upon the fickleness and violence of the
					people in matters of government, and a decided superiority given to the Senate
					both in the deliberative and executive parts of administration. This advantage
					was afterwards indeed diminished by the creation of Tribunes of the people; a
					set of men whose ambition often embroiled the Republic in civil dissensions, and
					who at last abused their authority to such a degree, that they became
					instruments of aggrandizement to any leading men in the state who could purchase
					their friendship. In general, however, the majority of the Tribunes being
					actuated by views which comprehended the interests of the multitude, rather than
					those of individuals, they did not so much endanger the liberty, as they
					interrupted the tranquillity, of the public; and when the occasional commotions
					subsided, there remained no permanent ground for the establishment of personal
					usurpation.</p><p>In every government, an object of the last importance to the peace and welfare of
					society is the morals of the people; and in proportion as a community is
					enlarged by propagation, or the accession of a multitude of new members, a more
					strict attention is requisite to guard against that dissolution of manners to
					which a crowded and extensive capital has a natural tendency. Of this the Romans
					became sensible in the growing state of the Republic. In the year of the City
					312, two magistrates were first created for taking an account of the number of
					the people, and the value of their estates; and soon after, they were invested
					with the authority not only of inspecting the morals of individuals, but of
					inflicting public censure for any licentiousness of conduct, or violation of
					decency. Thus both the civil and religious institutions concurred to restrain
					the people within the bounds of good order and obedience to the laws; at the
					same time that the frugal life of the ancient Romans proved a strong security
					against those vices which operate most effectually towards sapping the
					foundations of a state.</p><p>But in the time of Julius Casar the barriers of public liberty were become too
					weak to restrain the audacious efforts of ambitious and desperate men. The
					veneration for the constitution, usually a powerful check to treasonable
					designs, had been lately violated by the usurpations of Marius and Sylla. The
					salutary terrors of religion no longer predominated over the consciences of men.
					The shame of public censure was extinguished in general depravity. An eminent
					historian, who lived at that time, informs us, that venality universally
					prevailed amongst the Romans; and a writer who flourished soon after, observes,
					that luxury and dissipation had encumbered almost all so much with debt, that
					they beheld with a degree of complacency the prospect of civil war and
					confusion.</p><p>The extreme degree of profligacy at which the Romans were now arrived is in
					nothing more evident, than that this age gave birth to the most horrible
					conspiracy which occurs in the annals of human kind, viz. that of Catiline. This
					was not the project of a few desperate and abandoned individuals, but of a
					number of men of the most illustrious rank in the state; and it appears beyond
					doubt, that Julius Caesar was accessory to the design, which was no less than to
					extirpate the Senate, divide amongst themselves both the public and private
					treasures, and set <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> on fire. The
					causes which prompted to this tremendous project,'it is generally admitted, were
					luxury, prodigality, irreligion, a total corruption of manners, and above all,
					as the immediate cause, the pressing necessity in which the conspirators were
					involved by their extreme dissipation.</p><p>The enormous debt in which Caesar himself was early involved, countenances an
					opinion that his anxiety to procure the province of <placeName key="tgn,1000070">Gaul</placeName> proceeded chiefly from this cause. But during nine years
					in which he held that province, he acquired such riches as must have rendered
					him, without competition, the most opulent person in the state. If nothing more,
					therefore, than a splendid establishment had been the object of his pursuit, he
					had attained to the summit of his wishes. But when we find him persevering in a
					plan of aggrandizement beyond this period of his fortunes, we can ascribe his
					conduct to no other motive than that of outrageous ambition. He projected the
					building of a new Forum at <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName>, for
					the ground only of which he was to pay $4,ooo000,000; he raised legions in
						<placeName key="tgn,1000070">Gaul</placeName> at his own charges; he
					promised such entertamments to the people as had never been known at <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> from the foundation of the city. All
					these circumstances evince some latent design of procuring such a popularity as
					might give him an uncontrolled influence in the management of public affairs.
					Pompey, we are told, was wont to to say, that Caesar not being able, with all
					his riches, to fulfil the promises which he had made, wished to throw everything
					into confusion. There may have been some foundation for this remark: but the
					opinion of Cicero is more probable, that Caesar's mind was seduced with the
					temptations of chimerical glory. It is observable that neither Cicero nor Pompey
					intimates any suspicion that Caesar was apprehensive of being impeached for his
					conduct, had he returned to <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> in a
					private station. Yet, that there was reason for such an apprehension, the
					positive declaration of L. Domitius leaves little room to doubt: especially when
					we consider the number of enemies that Caesar had in the Senate, and the
					coolness of his former friend Pompey ever after the death of Julia. The proposed
					impeachment was founded upon a notorious charge of prosecuting measures
					destructive of the interests of the commonwealth, and tending ultimately to an
					object incompatible with public freedom. Indeed, considering the extreme
					corruption which prevailed amongst the Romans at this time, it is more than
					probable that Caesar would have been acquitted of the charge, but at such an
					expense as must have stripped him of all his riches, and placed him again in a
					situation ready to attempt a disturbance of the public tranquillity. For it is
					said, that he purchased the friendship of Curio, at the commencement of the
					civil war, with a bribe little short of half a million sterling.</p><p>Whatever Caesar's private motive may have been for taking arms against his
					country, he embarked in an enterprise of a nature the most dangerous: and had
					Pompey conducted himself in any degree suitable to the reputation which he had
					formerly acquired, the contest would in all probability have terminated in
					favour of public freedom. But by dilatory measures in the beginning, by
					imprudently withdrawing his army from <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName> into a distant province, and by not pursuing the
					advantage he had gained by the vigorous repulse of Caesar's troops in their
					attack upon his camp, this commander lost every opportunity of extinguishing a
					war which was to determine the fate, and even the existence, of the Republic. It
					was accordingly determined on the plains of Pharsalia, where Caesar obtained a
					victory which was not more decisive than unexpected. He was now no longer
					amenable either to the tribunal of the Senate or the power of the laws, but
					triumphed at once over his enemies and the constitution of his country.</p><p>It is to the honour of Caesar, that when he had obtained the supreme power, he
					exercised it with a degree of moderation beyond what was generally expected by
					those who had fought on the side of the Republic. Of his private life either
					before or after this period, little is transmitted in history. Henceforth,
					however, he seems to have lived chiefly at <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName>, near which he had a small villa, upon an eminence,
					commanding a beautiful prospect. His time was almost entirely occupied with
					public affairs, in the management of which, though he employed many agents, he
					appears to have had none in the character of actual minister. He was in general
					easy of access: but Cicero, in a letter to a friend, complains of having been
					treated with the indignity of waiting a considerable time amongst a crowd in an
					anti-chamber, before he could have an audience. The elevation of Caesar placed
					him not above discharging reciprocally the social duties in the intercourse of
					life. He returned the visits of those who waited upon him, and would sup at
					their houses. At table, and in the use of wine, he was habitually temperate.
					Upon the whole, he added nothing to his own happiness by all the dangers, the
					fatigues, and the perpetual anxiety which he had incurred in the pursuit of
					unlimited power. His health was greatly impaired: his former cheerfulness of
					temper, though not his magnanimity, appears to have forsaken him; and we behold
					in his fate a memorable example of illustrious talents rendered, by inordinate
					ambition, destructive to himself, and irretrievably pernicious to his country.
				</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>