<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:9.4.133-9.4.137</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:9.4.133-9.4.137</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="section"><div n="133" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> I do not for a moment deny that the structure of this passage is
                            excellent, but I refuse to admit that the form of rhythmical structure
                            which it exemplifies should be forced on all <hi rend="italic">exordia.</hi> For there are various ways in which the <pb n="v7-9 p.583"/> judge's mind may be prepared for what is to come:
                            at times we appeal for pity, at others take up a modest attitude, while
                            we may assume an air of energy or dignity, flatter our audience, attempt
                            to alter their opinions and exhort them to give us their best attention,
                            according as the situation may demand. And as all these methods are
                            different by nature, so each requires a different rhythmical treatment.
                            Did Cicero employ similar rhythms in his <hi rend="italic">exordia</hi>
                            to the <hi rend="italic">pro Milone,</hi> the <hi rend="italic">pro
                                Cluentio</hi> and the <hi rend="italic">pro Ligario?</hi>
                     </p></div><div n="134" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> The <hi rend="italic">statement of fact</hi> as a rule requires slower
                            and what I may be allowed to call more modest feet; and the different
                            kinds of feet should, as far as possible, be intermixed. For while the
                            style of this portion of our speech is generally marked by restraint of
                            language, there are occasions when it is called upon to soar to greater
                            heights, although on the other hand its aim will at all times be to
                            instruct the audience and impress the facts upon their minds, a task
                            which must not be carried out in a hurry. Indeed my personal opinion is
                            that the <hi rend="italic">statement of fact</hi> should be composed of
                            long <hi rend="italic">cola</hi> and short <hi rend="italic">periods.</hi> Arguments, </p></div><div n="135" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> inasmuch as they are characterised by energy and speed, will employ the
                            feet best adapted to these qualities. They will not however acquire
                            rapidity at the expense of force by employing <hi rend="italic">trochees,</hi>
                        <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">Trochee</hi> (u u u). </note> but will rather make
                            use of those feet which consist of a mixture of long and short
                            syllables, though the long should not outnumber the short. Lofty
                            passages, </p></div><div n="136" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> which employ long and sonorous vowels, are specially well served by the
                            amplitude of the <hi rend="italic">dactyl</hi> and the <hi rend="italic">paean,</hi> feet which, although they contain a majority of short
                            syllables, are yet not deficient in time-length. On the other hand,
                            where <pb n="v7-9 p.585"/> violence is required, the requisite energy
                            will be best secured by the employment of the <hi rend="italic">iambus,</hi> not merely because that foot contains but two
                            syllables, with the result that its beat is more frequent, making it
                            unsuited to gentle language, but also because every foot gives the
                            effect of an ascent, as they climb and swell from short to long, a fact
                            which renders them superior to the <hi rend="italic">choreus,</hi> which
                            sinks from long to short. </p></div><div n="137" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Subdued passages, such as occur in the <hi rend="italic">peroration,</hi> also require slow syllables, which must, however,
                            be less sonorous. Celsus insists that there is a special form of
                            rhythmical structure which produces a particularly stately effect: I do
                            not know to what he refers and, if I did, should not teach it, since it
                            must inevitably be slow and flat, that is to say unless this quality is
                            derived from the words and thoughts expressed. If it is to be sought for
                            its own sake, independent of such considerations, I cannot sufficiently
                            condemn it. But, to bring this discussion to a close, </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>