<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:9.3.57-9.3.63</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:9.3.57-9.3.63</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="section"><div n="57" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> It is also to be found in poets, as in the passage in Homer <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">Il.</hi> ii.
                                101. </note> describing the sceptre which he traces from the hands
                            of Jupiter down to those of Agamemnon, and in the following from one of
                            our own tragedians: <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">Unknown.</note>
                        <quote rend="blockquote"><quote><l part="N">From
                                        Jove, so runs the tale, was Tantalus sprung,</l><l part="N">From Tantalus Pelops, and of Pelops' seed</l><l part="N">Sprang Atreus, who is sire of all our
                                line.</l></quote></quote>
                     </p></div><div n="58" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> As regards the figures produced by omission, they rely for their charm
                            in the main on conciseness and novelty. There is one of these which I
                            mentioned in the last book <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">VII. vi. 21.</note> with reference to <hi rend="italic">synecdoche,</hi> and postponed discussing until such time as I came
                            to deal with <hi rend="italic">figures:</hi> it occurs when the word
                            omitted may be clearly gathered from the context: an example may be
                            found in Caelius' denunciation of Antony: <hi rend="italic">stupere
                                gaudio Graecus:</hi>
                        <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><quote>The Greek was struck dumb with joy.</quote></note> for
                            we must clearly supply <hi rend="italic">coepit.</hi> Or take the
                            following passage from a letter of Cicero <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"> Lost. <quote> No talk except of you. What
                                    better? Then Fla virus says, 'Couriers to-morrow,' and I
                                    scribbled these lines at his house during dinner.
                                </quote>
                        </note> to Brutus: <hi rend="italic"> Serno nullus scilicet
                                nisi de te: quid enim potius? turn Flavius, cras, inquit,
                                tabellarii, et ego ibidem has inter cenum exaravi. </hi>
                     </p></div><div n="59" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Of a similar kind, at any rate in my opinion, are those passages in
                            which words are decently omitted to spare our modesty. <quote rend="blockquote"><cit><quote><l part="N"> You—while the goats looked goatish-we know
                                            <lb/> who, </l><l part="N"> And in what chapel—(but the
                                            kind Nymphs <lb/> laughed). </l></quote><bibl default="false"><hi rend="italic">Ecl.</hi> iii. 8.
                                    </bibl></cit></quote>
                        <pb n="v7-9 p.481"/> Some regard this as an <hi rend="italic">aposiopesis,</hi> but wrongly. </p></div><div n="60" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> For in <hi rend="italic">aposiopesis</hi> it is either uncertain or at
                            least requires an explanation of some length to show what is suppressed,
                            whereas in the present case only one word, and that of an obvious
                            character, is missing. If this, then, is an <hi rend="italic">aposiopesis,</hi> all omissions will have a claim to the title.
                        </p></div><div n="61" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> I would not even allow the name of <hi rend="italic">aposiopesis</hi> to
                            all cases where what is omitted is left to be understood, as for example
                            the following phrase from Cicero's letters, <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"> Lost. The sense is, <quote>Despatched on the
                                    day on which Antony offered Caesar the crown.</quote>
                        </note>
                        <hi rend="italic">Data Lupercalibus quo die Antonius Caesari:</hi> for
                            there, there is no real suppression: the omission is merely playful, for
                            there is but one way of completing the sentence, namely with the words
                                <hi rend="italic">diadema imposuit.</hi>
                     </p></div><div n="62" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Another figure produced by omission is that of which I have just spoken,
                                <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">§ 50.</note> when the
                            connecting particles are omitted. A third is the figure known as
                                <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐπεζευγμένον</foreign> in which a number of
                            clauses are all completed by the same verb, which would be required by
                            each singly if they stood alone. In such cases the verb to which the
                            rest of the sentence refers may come first, as in the following
                            instance: <hi rend="italic">Vicit pudorem lilido, timiorem audacia,
                                rationem amentia.</hi>
                        <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">Pro Cluent.</hi> vi. 15. <quote>Lust conquered
                                    shame, boldness fear, madness reason.</quote>
                        </note> Or it may
                            come last, closing a number of clauses, as in the following: <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">Cat.</hi> i.
                                ix. 22. <quote> For you are not the man, Catiline, to be deterred
                                    from vile acts by shame, from peril by fear, or from madness by
                                    reason. </quote>
                        </note>
                        <hi rend="italic"> Neque enim is es,
                                Catilina, ut te aut pudor unquam a turpitudine ant meites a periculo
                                aut ratio a furore revocaverit. </hi>
                     </p></div><div n="63" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> The verb may even be placed in the middle so as to serve both what
                            precedes and what follows. The same figure may join different sexes, as
                            for example when we speak of a male and female child under the
                            comprehensive term of <quote>sons</quote> ; or it may <pb n="v7-9 p.483"/> interchange singular and plural. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>