<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:5.10.118-5.10.121</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:5.10.118-5.10.121</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="118" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> The force of this argument resides in the fact that it is not based on
                            any external support, but holds good in itself. Proceeding to the third
                            line of argument we may note that the first portion of it is of a more
                            ordinary type, namely that the right to repayment is not based on the
                            actual document, a plea which can be supported by many arguments. Doubt
                            may also be thrown on Alexander's purpose: did he intend to honour them
                            or to trick them? Another argument peculiar to the subject (indeed it
                            practically introduces a new discussion) is that the Thebans may be
                            regarded as having in virtue of their restoration recovered the right
                            even though it be admitted that they had lost it. Again Cassander's
                            purpose may be discussed, but, as the case is being pleaded before the
                            Amphictyonic council, we shall find that the most powerful plea that can
                            be urged is that of equity. </p></div><div n="119" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> I make these remarks, not because I think that a knowledge of the
                                <quote>places</quote>
                        <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">See
                                V. x. 20.</note> from which arguments may be derived is useless (had
                            I thought so, I should have passed them by)but to prevent those who have
                            learnt these rules from neglecting other considerations and regarding
                            themselves as having a perfect and absolute knowledge of the whole
                            subject, and to make them realise that, unless they acquire a thorough
                            knowledge of the <pb n="v4-6 p.269"/> remaining points which I am about
                            to discuss, they will be the possessors of what I can only call a dumb
                            science. </p></div><div n="120" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> For the discovery of arguments was not the result of the publication of
                            text-books, but every kind of argument was put forward before any rules
                            were laid down, and it was only later that writers of rhetoric noted
                            them and collected them for publication. A proof of this is the fact
                            that the examples which they use are old and quoted from the orators,
                            while they themselves discover nothing new or that has not been said
                            before. </p></div><div n="121" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> The creators of the art were therefore the orators, though we owe a debt
                            of gratitude also to those who have given us a short cut to knowledge.
                            For thanks to them the arguments discovered by the genius of earlier
                            orators have not got to be hunted out and noted down in detail. But this
                            does not suffice to make an orator any more than it suffices to learn
                            the art of gymnastic in school: the body must be assisted by continual
                            practice, self control, diet and above all by nature; on the other hand
                            none of these are sufficient in themselves without the aid of art. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>