<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:4.5.14-4.5.18</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:4.5.14-4.5.18</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="section"><div n="14" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> But if we have any doubts as to being able to prove the stronger
                            argument, we shall do well to rely on both. Different arguments move
                            different people. He who thinks that the act was committed may regard it
                            as a just act, while he who is deaf to the plea that the act was just
                            may perhaps believe that it was never committed: one who is confident of
                            his powers as a marksman may be content with one shaft, whereas he who
                            has no such confidence will do well to launch several and give fortune a
                            chance to come to his assistance. </p></div><div n="15" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Cicero in the <hi rend="italic">pro Milone</hi> reveals the utmost skill
                            in showing first that Clodius laid an ambush for Milo and then in adding
                            as a supernumerary argument that, even if he had not done so, he was
                            nevertheless so bad a citizen that his slaying could only have done
                            credit to the patriotism of the slayer and redounded to his glory. </p></div><div n="16" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> I would not however entirely condemn the order mentioned above, <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">§ 13.</note> since there are
                            certain arguments which, though hard in themselves, may serve to soften
                            those which come after. The proverb, <quote>If you want to get your due,
                                you must ask for something more,</quote>
                        <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"> The proverb would seem originally to refer to
                                bargaining in the market: the salesman, knowing he will be beaten
                                down, sets his original price too high. But it would equally apply
                                to claims for damages in the courts. </note>
                     </p></div><div n="17" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> is not wholly unreasonable. Still no one should interpret it to mean
                            that you must stop short of nothing. For the Greeks are right when they
                            lay it down as a rule that we should not attempt the impossible. But
                            whenever the double-barrelled defence of which I am speaking is
                            employed, we must aim at making the first argument support the
                            credibility of the second. For he who might without danger to himself
                            have confessed to the commission of the act, can have no motive for
                            lying when he denies the commission. <pb n="v4-6 p.147"/>
                     </p></div><div n="18" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Above all it is important, whenever we suspect that the judge desires a
                            proof other than that on which we are engaged, to promise that we will
                            satisfy him on the point fully and without delay, more especially if the
                            question is one of our client's honour. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>