<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:3.7.4-3.7.6</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:3.7.4-3.7.6</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="section"><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> But what problem is involved by the praise of Jupiter Capitolinus, a
                            stock theme of the sacred Capitoline contest, <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"> The quinquennial contest in honour of Jupiter
                                Capitolinus, founded by Domitian in 86. </note> which is undoubtedly
                            treated in regular rhetorical form? <pb n="v1-3 p.467"/> However, just
                            as panegyric applied to practical matters requires proof, so too a
                            certain semblance of proof is at times required by speeches composed
                            entirely for display. </p></div><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> For instance, a speaker who tells how Romulus was the son of Mars and
                            reared by the she-wolf, will offer as proofs of his divine origin the
                            facts that when thrown into a running stream he escaped drowning, that
                            all his achievements were such as to make it credible that he was the
                            offspring of the god of battles, and that his contemporaries
                            unquestionably believed that he was translated to heaven. </p></div><div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Some arguments will even wear a certain semblance of defence: for
                            example, if the orator is speaking in praise of Hercules, he will find
                            excuses for his hero having changed raiment with the Queen of Lydia and
                            submitted to the tasks which legend tells us she imposed upon him. The
                            proper function however of panegyric is to amplify and embellish its
                            themes. This form of oratory is directed in the main to the praise of
                            gods and men, but may occasionally be applied to the praise of animals
                            or even of inanimate objects. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>