<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:3.6.89-3.6.91</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:3.6.89-3.6.91</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="section"><div n="89" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p><hi rend="italic">Definition</hi> also belongs to both classes of
                            question, namely those concerned with the consideration of <hi rend="italic">facts</hi> and those concerned with the <hi rend="italic">letter of the law.</hi> All these questions, although
                            they come under the three <hi rend="italic">bases,</hi> yet since, as I
                            have mentioned, <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">§ 87.</note>
                            they have certain characteristic features of their own, require to be
                            pointed out to learners; and we must allow them to be called <hi rend="italic">legal bases</hi> or <hi rend="italic">questions</hi>
                            or <hi rend="italic">minor heads,</hi> as long as it is clearly
                            understood that none of them involve any other <hi rend="italic">questions</hi> than the three I have mentioned. <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">§ 80.</note>
                     </p></div><div n="90" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> As regards questions of <hi rend="italic">quantity, number,
                                relation,</hi> and, as some have thought, <hi rend="italic">comparison,</hi> the <pb n="v1-3 p.457"/> case is different. For
                            these have no connexion with the complexities of the law, but are
                            concerned with reason only. Consequently they must always be regarded as
                            coming under <hi rend="italic">conjecture</hi> or <hi rend="italic">quality,</hi> as, for instance, when we ask with what purpose, or
                            at what time, or place something was done. </p></div><div n="91" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> But I will speak of individual questions when I come to handle the rules
                            for <hi rend="italic">division.</hi>
                        <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">Book VII.</note> This much is agreed to by all
                            writers, that one <hi rend="italic">cause</hi> possesses one <hi rend="italic">basis,</hi> but that as regards secondary questions
                            related to the main issue of the trial, there may frequently be a number
                            in one single cause. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>