<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:2.14.1-2.14.5</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:2.14.1-2.14.5</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="14" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Rhetoric is a Greek term which has been translated into Latin by <hi rend="italic">oratoria</hi> or <hi rend="italic">oratrix. I</hi>
                            would not for the world deprive the translators of the praise which is
                            their due for attempting to increase the vocabulary of our native
                            tongue; but translations <pb n="v1-3 p.299"/> from Greek into Latin are
                            not always satisfactory, just as the attempt to represent Latin words in
                            a Greek dress is sometimes equally unsuccessful. </p></div><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> And the translations in question are fully as harsh as the <hi rend="italic">essentia</hi> and <hi rend="italic">queentia</hi>
                        <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">sc.</hi>
                                essence and possibility. </note> of Plautus, <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"> A Stoic. <hi rend="italic">cp.</hi> x. i. 124.
                            </note> and have not even the merit of being exact. For <hi rend="italic">oratoria</hi> is formed like <hi rend="italic">elocutoria</hi> and <hi rend="italic">oratrix</hi> like <hi rend="italic">elocutrix,</hi> whereas the rhetoric with which we are
                            concerned is rather to be identified with <hi rend="italic">eloquentia,</hi> and the word is undoubtedly used in two senses by
                            the Greeks. </p></div><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> In the one case it is an adjective i.e. <hi rend="italic">ars
                                rhetorica,</hi> the rhetorical art, like piratic in the phrase <hi rend="italic">nauis piratica,</hi> in the other it is a noun like
                            philosophy or friendship. It is as a substantive that we require it
                            here; now the correct translation of the Greek <hi rend="italic">grammatice</hi> is <hi rend="italic">litteratura</hi> not <hi rend="italic">litteratrix or litteratoria,</hi> which would be the
                            forms analogous to <hi rend="italic">oratrix</hi> and <hi rend="italic">oratoria.</hi> But in the case of <quote>rhetoric</quote> there is
                            no similar Latin equivalent. </p></div><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> It is best therefore not to quarrel about it, more especially as we have
                            to use Greek terms in many other cases. For I may at least use the words
                                <hi rend="italic">philosophus, musicus</hi> and <hi rend="italic">geometres</hi> without outraging them by changing them into clumsy
                            Latin equivalents. Finally, since Cicero gave a Greek title <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">See § 6 of next chapter.</note>
                            to the earlier works which he wrote on this subject, I may without fear
                            of rashness accept the great orator as sufficient authority for the name
                            of the art which he professed. </p></div><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> To resume, then, rhetoric (for I shall now use the name without fear of
                            captious criticism) is in my opinion best treated under the three
                            following heads, the art, the artist and the work. The art is that which
                            we should acquire by study, and is the art of <pb n="v1-3 p.301"/>
                            speaking well. The artist is he who has acquired the art, that is to
                            say, he is the orator whose task it is to speak well. The work is the
                            achievement of the artist, namely good speaking. Each of these three <hi rend="italic">general</hi> divisions is in its turn divided into <hi rend="italic">species.</hi> Of the two latter divisions I shall
                            speak in their proper place. For the present I shall proceed to a
                            discussion of the first. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>