<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:12.3.4-12.5.1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:12.3.4-12.5.1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="section"><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> I am not ignorant of the generally prevailing custom, nor have I
                            forgotten those who sit by our store-chests and provide weapons for the
                            pleader: I know too that the Greeks did likewise: hence the name of <hi rend="italic">pragmaticus</hi> which was bestowed on such persons.
                            But I am speaking of an orator, who owes it as a duty to his case to
                            serve it not merely by the loudness of his voice, but by all other means
                            that may be of assistance to it. </p></div><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Consequently I do not wish my orator to be helpless, if it so chance
                            that he puts in an appearance for the preliminary proceedings to which
                            the hour before the commencement of the trial <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">Ad horam constare</hi> appears
                                to be a technical <hi rend="italic">term</hi> for <quote>apperance
                                    at the preliminary hour.</quote> the purpose of which is
                                indicated in the paraphrase given above. </note> is allotted, or to
                            be unskilful in the preparation and production of evidence. For who,
                            sooner than himself, should prepare the points which he wishes to be
                            brought out when he is pleading? You might as well suppose that the
                            qualifications of a successful general consist merely in courage and
                            energy in the field of battle and skill in meeting all the demands of
                            actual conflict, while suffering him to be ignorant of the methods of
                            levying troops, mustering and equipping his forces, arranging for
                            supplies or selecting a suitable position for his camp, despite the fact
                            that preparation for war is an essential preliminary for its successful
                            conduct. </p></div><div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> And yet such a general would bear a very close resemblance to the
                            advocate who leaves much of the detail that is necessary for success to
                                <pb n="v10-12 p.405"/> the care of others, more especially in view of
                            the fact that this, the most necessary element in the management of a
                            case, is not as difficult as it may perhaps seem to outside observers.
                            For every point of law, which is certain, is based either on written law
                            or accepted custom: if, on the other hand, the point is doubtful, it
                            must be examined in the light of equity. </p></div><div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Laws which are either written or founded on accepted custom present no
                            difficulty, since they call merely for knowledge and make no demand on
                            the imagination. On the other hand, the points explained in the rulings
                            of the legal experts turn either on the interpretation of words or on
                            the distinction between right and wrong. To understand the meaning of
                            each word is either common to all sensible men or the special possession
                            of the orator, while the demands of equity are known to every good man.
                        </p></div><div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Now I regard the orator above all as being a man of virtue and good
                            sense, who will not be seriously troubled, after having devoted himself
                            to the study of that which is excellent by nature, if some legal expert
                            disagrees with him; for even they are allowed to disagree among
                            themselves. But if he further wishes to know the views of everyone, he
                            will require to read, and reading is the least laborious of' all the
                            tasks that fall to the student's lot. </p></div><div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Moreover, if the class of legal experts is as a rule drawn from those
                            who, in despair of making successful pleaders, have taken refuge with
                            the law, how easy it must be for an orator to know what those succeed in
                            learning, who by their own confession are incapable of becoming orators!
                            But Marcus Cato was at once a great orator and an expert lawyer, while
                            Scaevola and Servius Sulpicius <pb n="v10-12 p.407"/> were universally
                            allowed to be eloquent as well. <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">i. e.</hi> as well as experts
                                on the law. </note>
                     </p></div><div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> And Cicero not merely possessed a sufficient supply of legal knowledge
                            to serve his needs when pleading, but actually began to write on the
                            subject, so that it is clear that an orator has not merely time to
                            learn, but even to teach the law. </p></div><div n="11" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Let no one, however, regard the advice I have given as to the attention
                            due to the development of character and the study of the law as being
                            impugned by the fact that we are familiar with many who, because they
                            were weary of the toil entailed on those who seek to scale the heights
                            of eloquence, have betaken themselves to the study of law as a refuge
                            for their indolence. Some of these transfer their attention to the
                            praetor's edicts or the civil law, <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"> The piraetor's edicts were displayed on a
                                whitened board ( <hi rend="italic">in albo</hi> ), while the
                                headings of the civil law were written in red. </note> and have
                            preferred to become specialists in <hi rend="italic">formulae,</hi> or
                            legalists, as Cicero <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">de Or.</hi> I. iv. 231. </note> calls them, on the
                            pretext of choosing a more useful branch of study, whereas their real
                            motive was its comparative easiness. </p></div><div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Others are the victims of a more arrogant form of sloth; they assume a
                            stern air and let their beards grow, and, as though despising the
                            precepts of oratory, sit for a while in the schools of the philosophers,
                            that, by an assumption of a severe mien before the public gaze and by an
                            affected contempt of others they may assert their moral superiority,
                            while leading a life of debauchery at home. For philosophy may be
                            counterfeited, but eloquence never. </p></div></div><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Above all, our orator should be equipped with a rich store of examples
                            both old and new: and he ought not merely to know those which are
                            recorded in history or transmitted by oral tradition or occur from day
                            to day, but should not neglect <pb n="v10-12 p.409"/> even those
                            fictitious examples invented by the great poets. </p></div><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> For while the former have the authority of evidence or even of legal
                            decisions, the latter also either have the warrant of antiquity or are
                            regarded as having been invented by great men to serve as lessons to the
                            world. He should therefore be acquainted with as many examples as
                            possible. It is this which gives old age so much authority, since the
                            old are believed to have a larger store of knowledge and experience, as
                            Homer so frequently bears witness. But we must not wait till the evening
                            of our days, since study has this advantage that, as far as knowledge of
                            facts is concerned, it is capable of giving the impression that we have
                            lived in ages long gone by. </p></div></div><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Such are the instruments of which I promised <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">Pr.</hi> 22 and xii. <hi rend="italic">Pr.</hi> 4. </note> to give account, the
                            instruments, that is, not merely of the art, as some have held, but of
                            the orator himself. These are the weapons that he should have ready to
                            his hand, this the knowledge with which he must be equipped, while it
                            must be supplemented by a ready store of words and figures, power of
                            imagination, skill in arrangement, retentiveness of memory and grace of
                            delivery. But of all these qualities the highest is that loftiness of
                            soul which fear cannot dismay nor uproar terrify nor the authority of
                            the audience fetter further than the respect which is their due. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>