<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:12.1.21-12.1.25</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:12.1.21-12.1.25</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="21" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> and indeed had I felt otherwise in this connexion, I might have defended
                            my point with greater boldness and freedom. <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"> Quintilian's reverence for Cicero is such that
                                he feels hampered in maintaining his thesis. </note> Marcus Antonius
                            declared that he had seen no man who was genuinely eloquent (and to be
                            eloquent is a far less achievement than to be an orator), while Cicero
                            himself has failed to find his orator in actual life and merely imagines
                            and strives to depict the ideal. Shall I then be afraid to say that in
                            the eternity of time that is yet to be, something more perfect may be
                            found than has yet existed? </p></div><div n="22" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> I say nothing of those critics who will not allow sufficient credit even
                            for eloquence to Cicero and Demosthenes, although Cicero himself does
                            not regard Demosthenes as flawless, but asserts that he sometimes nods,
                                <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">See x. i. 24.</note> while
                            even Cicero fails to satisfy Brutus and Calvus (at any rate they
                            criticised his style to his face), or to win the complete approval of
                            either of the Asinii, who in various passages attack the faults of his
                            oratory in language which is positively hosthe. <pb n="v10-12 p.369"/>
                     </p></div><div n="23" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> However, let us fly in the face of nature and assume that a bad man has
                            been discovered who is endowed with the highest eloquence. I shall none
                            the less deny that he is an orator. For I should not allow that every
                            man who has shown himself ready with his hands was necessarily a brave
                            man, because true courage cannot be conceived of without the
                            accompaniment of virtue. </p></div><div n="24" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Surely the advocate who is called to defend the accused requires to be a
                            man of honour, honour which greed cannot corrupt, influence seduce, or
                            fear dismay. Shall we then dignify the traitor, the deserter, the
                            turncoat with the sacred name of orator? But if the quality which is
                            usually termed goodness is to be found even in quite ordinary advocates,
                            why should not the orator, who has not yet existed, but may still be
                            born, be no less perfect in character than in excellence of speech? </p></div><div n="25" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> It is no hack-advocate, no hireling pleader, nor yet, to use no harser
                            term, a serviceable attorney of the class generally known as <hi rend="italic">causidici,</hi> that I am seeking to form, but rather
                            a man who to extraordinary natural gifts has added a thorough mastery of
                            all the fairest branches of knowledge, a man sent by heaven to be the
                            blessing of mankind, one to whom all history can find no parallel,
                            uniquely perfect in every detail and utterly noble alike in thought and
                            speech. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>