<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:10.5.18-10.5.20</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:10.5.18-10.5.20</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="18" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Indeed it is recorded that this fate actually befell Marcus Porcius
                            Latro, the first professor of rhetoric to make a name for himself; for
                            when, at the height of his fame in the schools, he was called upon to
                            plead a case in the forum, he put forward the most earnest request that
                            the court should be transferred to some public hall. He was so
                            unaccustomed to speak in the open air that all his eloquence seemed to
                            reside within the compass of a <pb n="v10-12 p.125"/> roof and four walls.
                        </p></div><div n="19" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> For this reason a young man who has acquired a thorough knowledge from
                            his instructors of the methods of invention and style (which is not by
                            any means an endless task, if those instructors have the knowledge and
                            the will to teach), and who has also managed to obtain a reasonable
                            amount of practice in the art, should follow the custom in vogue with
                            our ancestors, and select some one orator to follow and imitate. He
                            should attend as many trials as possible and be a frequent spectator of
                            the conflicts in which he is destined to take part. </p></div><div n="20" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Next he should write out speeches of his own dealing either with the
                            cases which he has actually heard pleaded or with others, provided
                            always they be actual cases, and should argue them from both sides,
                            training himself with the real weapons of his warfare, just as
                            gladiators do or as Brutus did in that speech in defence of Milo which I
                            have already mentioned. <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">See
                                III. vi. 93; x. i. 23.</note> This is better than writing replies to
                            old speeches, as Cestius did to Cicero's defence of Milo in spite of the
                            fact that, his knowledge being confined to what was said for the
                            defence, he could not have possessed sufficient acquaintance with the
                            other side of the case. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>