<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:1.6.31-1.6.35</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:1.6.31-1.6.35</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="31" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Such a science demands profound erudition, whether we are dealing with
                            the large number of words which are derived from the Greek, more
                            especially those inflected according to the practice of the Aeolic
                            dialect, the form of Greek which most nearly resembles Latin; or are
                            using ancient historians as a basis for inquiry into the origin of names
                            of men, places, nations and cities. For instance what is the origin of
                            names such as <hi rend="italic">Brutus, Publicola,</hi> or <hi rend="italic">Pythicus?</hi> Why do we speak of <hi rend="italic">Latium, Italia</hi> or <hi rend="italic">Beneventum?</hi> What is
                            the reason for employing such names as <hi rend="italic">Capitolium,
                                collis Quirinalis</hi> or <hi rend="italic">Argietum?</hi>
                        <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">For derivations see Index of
                                Names at end.</note>
                     </p></div><div n="32" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> I now turn to minor points concerning which enthusiasts for etymology
                            give themselves an <pb n="v1-3 p.127"/> infinity of trouble, restoring
                            to their true form words which have become slightly altered: the methods
                            which they employ are varied and manifold: they shorten them or lengthen
                            them, add, remove, or interchange letters and syllables as the case may
                            be. As a result perverseness of judgment leads to the most hideous
                            absurdities. I am ready to admit that <hi rend="italic">consul</hi> may
                            be derived from <hi rend="italic">consulere</hi> in the sense of
                            consulting or judging; for the ancients used <hi rend="italic">consulere</hi> in the latter sense, and it still survives in the
                            phrase <hi rend="italic">rogat boni consulas,</hi> that is <hi rend="italic">bonum iudices,</hi>
                        <quote>judge fit.</quote>
                     </p></div><div n="33" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Again <hi rend="italic">senatus</hi> may well be derived from old age
                            (for the senators are called <quote>the fathers</quote> ): I concur in
                            the derivations assigned to <hi rend="italic">rex rector</hi> to say
                            nothing of many other words where there can be no doubt, and do not
                            refuse to accept those suggested for <hi rend="italic">tegula,
                                regula</hi> and the like: let <hi rend="italic">classis</hi> be from
                                <hi rend="italic">calare</hi> (call out, summon), <hi rend="italic">lepus</hi> be a contraction of <hi rend="italic">levipes</hi> and
                                <hi rend="italic">vulpes of volipes.</hi>
                     </p></div><div n="34" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> But are we also to admit the derivation of certain words from their
                            opposites, and accept <hi rend="italic">lucus a non lucendo,</hi> since
                            a grove is dark with shade, <hi rend="italic">ludus</hi> in the sense of
                            school as being so called because it is quite the reverse of
                                <quote>play</quote> and <hi rend="italic">Dis, Ditis</hi> from <hi rend="italic">diues,</hi> because Pluto is far from being rich? Are
                            we to assent to the view that <hi rend="italic">homo</hi> is derived
                            from <hi rend="italic">humus,</hi> because man sprang from the earth, as
                            though all other living things had not the same origin or as if
                            primitive man gave the earth a name before giving one to himself? Or
                            again can <hi rend="italic">verbum</hi> be derived from <hi rend="italic">aer verheratus,</hi>
                        <quote>beaten air</quote> ? </p></div><div n="35" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Let us go a little further and we shall find that <hi rend="italic">stella</hi> is believed to be <hi rend="italic">still
                                luminis</hi>
                        <quote>a drop of light,</quote> a derivation whose
                            author is so famous in literature that it would <pb n="v1-3 p.129"/> be
                            unkind to mention his name in connexion with a point where he comes in
                            for censure. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>