<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:1.12.18-2.1.13</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:1.12.18-2.1.13</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="18" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> But he that has enough of the divine spark to conceive the ideal
                            eloquence, he who, as the great tragic poet <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">Pacuvius (Ribbeck, 177).</note> says, regards
                                <quote>oratory</quote> as <quote>the queen of all the world</quote>
                            and seeks not the transitory gains of advocacy, but those stable and
                            lasting rewards which his own soul and knowledge and <pb n="v1-3 p.201"/> contemplation can give, <hi rend="italic">he</hi> will easily
                            persuade himself to spend his time not, like so many, in the theatre or
                            in the Campus Martius, in dicing or in idle talk, to say naught of the
                            hours that are wasted in sleep or long drawn banqueting, but in
                            listening rather to the geometrician and the teacher of music. For by
                            this he will win a richer harvest of delight than can ever be gathered
                            from the pleasures of the ignorant, since among the many gifts of
                            providence to man not the least is this that the highest pleasure is the
                            child of virtue. </p></div><div n="19" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> But the attractions of my theme have led me to say overmuch. Enough of
                            those studies in which a boy must be instructed, while he is yet too
                            young to proceed to greater things! My next book will start afresh and
                            will pass to the consideration of the duties of the teacher of rhetoric.
                        </p></div></div></div><pb n="v1-3 p.205"/><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="book"><head>Book II</head><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> THE custom has prevailed and is daily growing commoner of sending boys
                            to the schools of rhetoric much later than is reasonable: this is always
                            the case as regards Latin rhetoric and occasionally applies to Greek as
                            well. The reason for this is twofold: the rhetoricians, more especially
                            our own, have abandoned certain of their duties and the teachers of
                            literature have undertaken tasks which rightly belong to others. </p></div><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> For the rhetorician considers that his duty is merely to declaim and
                            give instruction in the theory and practice of declamation and confines
                            his activities to deliberative and judicial themes, regarding all others
                            as beneath the dignity of his profession; while the teacher of
                            literature is not satisfied to take what is left him (and we owe him a
                            debt of gratitude for this), but even presumes to handle declamations in
                            character and deliberative themes, <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">suasoriae</hi> are
                                declamations on deliberative themes (e.g. Hannibal deliberates
                                whether he should cross the Alps). </note> tasks which impose the
                            very heaviest burden on the speaker. </p></div><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Consequently subjects which once formed the first stages of rhetoric
                            have come to form the final stages of a literary education, and boys who
                            are ripe for more advanced study are kept back in the inferior school
                            and practise rhetoric under the direction of teachers of literature.
                            Thus we get the absurd result that a boy is not regarded as fit to go on
                            to the schools of declamation till he knows how to declaim. <pb n="v1-3 p.207"/> The two professions must each be assigned their
                            proper sphere. </p></div><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p><hi rend="italic">Grammatice,</hi> which we translate as the science of
                            letters, must learn to know its own limits, especially as it has
                            encroached so far beyond the boundaries to which its unpretentious name
                            should restrict it and to which its earlier professors actually confined
                            themselves. Springing from a tiny fountain-head, it has gathered
                            strength from the historians and critics and has swollen to the
                            dimensions of a brimming river, since, not content with the theory of
                            correct speech, no inconsiderable subject, it has usurped the study of
                            practically all the highest departments of knowledge. </p></div><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> On the other hand rhetoric, which derives its name from the power of
                            eloquence, must not shirk its peculiar duties nor rejoice to see its own
                            burdens shouldered by others. For the neglect of these is little less
                            than a surrender of its birthright. </p></div><div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> I will of course admit that there may be a few professors of literature
                            who have acquired sufficient knowledge to be able to teach rhetoric as
                            well; but when they do so, they are performing the duties of the
                            rhetorician, not their own. </p></div><div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> A further point into which we must enquire concerns the age at which a
                            boy may be considered sufficiently advanced to profit by the
                            instructions of the rhetorician. In this connexion we must consider not
                            the boy's actual age, but the progress he has made in his studies. To
                            put it briefly, I hold that the best answer to the question <quote>When
                                should a boy be sent to the school of rhetoric?</quote>
                     </p></div><div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> is this, <quote>When he is fit.</quote> But this question is really
                            dependent on that previously raised. For if the duties of the teacher of
                            literature are prolonged to include instruction in deliberative
                            declamation, this will <pb n="v1-3 p.209"/> postpone the need for the
                            rhetorician. On the other hand if the rhetorician does not refuse to
                            undertake the first duties of his task, his instruction will be required
                            from the moment the boy begins to compose narratives and his first
                            attempts at passages of praise or denunciation. </p></div><div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> We know that the orators of earlier days improved their eloquence by
                            declaiming themes and common-places <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">communes loci</hi> = passages
                                dealing with some general principle or theme. For <hi rend="italic">theses</hi> see <milestone n="2" unit="chapter"/>
                           <milestone n="1" unit="section"/> iv. 24. </note> and other forms of
                            rhetorical exercises not involving particular circumstances or persons
                            such as provide the material for real or imaginary causes. <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">controversiae</hi> are declamations on controversial or
                                judicial themes. A general rule or law is stated: then a special
                                case, which has to be solved in accordance with the law. An
                                abbreviated <hi rend="italic">controversia</hi> is to be found in I.
                                x. 33, and they occur frequently hereafter (cp. esp. <milestone n="3" unit="chapter"/>
                           <milestone n="1" unit="section"/> vi. 96).
                            </note> From this we can clearly see what a scandalous dereliction of
                            duty it is for the schools of rhetoric to abandon this department of
                            their work, which was not merely its first, but for a long time its sole
                            task. </p></div><div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> What is there in those exercises of which I have just spoken that does
                            not involve matters which are the special concern of rhetoric and
                            further are typical of actual legal cases? Have we not to narrate facts
                            in the law-courts? Indeed I am not sure that this is not the most
                            important department of rhetoric in actual practice. </p></div><div n="11" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Are not eulogy and denunciation frequently introduced in the course of
                            the contests of the courts? Are not common-places frequently inserted in
                            the very heart of lawsuits, whether, like those which we find in the
                            works of Cicero, they are directed against vice, or, like those
                            published by Quintus Hortensius, deal with questions of general interest
                            such as <quote>whether small points of argument should carry
                                weight,</quote> or are employed to defend or impugn the credibility
                            of witnesses? </p></div><div n="12" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> These are weapons which we should always have stored in our armoury
                            ready for immediate use as occasion may demand. The critic who denies
                            that <pb n="v1-3 p.211"/> such matters concern an orator is one who will
                            refuse to believe that a statue is being begun when its limbs are
                            actually being cast. Some will think that I am in too great a hurry, but
                            let no one accuse me of thinking that the pupil who has been entrusted
                            to the rhetorician should forthwith be withdrawn from the teacher of
                            literature. </p></div><div n="13" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> The latter will still have certain hours allotted him, and there is no
                            reason to fear that a boy will be overloaded by receiving instruction
                            from two different masters. It will not mean any increase of work, but
                            merely the division among two masters of the studies which were
                            previously indiscriminately combined under one: and the efficiency of
                            either teacher will be increased. This method is still in vogue among
                            the Greeks, but has been abandoned by us, not perhaps without some
                            excuse, as there were others ready to step into the rhetorician's shoes.
                        </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>