<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:9.9.3-9.10.3</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:9.9.3-9.10.3</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="9" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="9" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Why, who is so ignorant of fetial law as not to see that these men are
							saying this, not because it represents the fact but to prevent their
							being surrendered? </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> I do not deny, senators, that where the pledged words of men are held to
							possess a binding force only second to the sanctions of religion, then
							such undertakings as we have given are as sacred as formal treaties. But
							I do say that without the express order of the people nothing can be
							ratified which can bind the people. </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Suppose the Samnites, in the same spirit of insolent pride in which they
							extorted this capitulation from us, had compelled us to recite the
							formula for the surrender of cities,<note anchored="true" n="4" resp="ed" place="unspecified">For this formula, see Vol. I. p. 45.</note>
							would you say, tribunes, that the Roman people was surrendered and that
							this City with its shrines and temples, its territory, and its waters
							had become the property of the Samnites? I say no more about surrender,
							because what we are considering is the pledge we gave in the
							capitulation. </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Well now, suppose we had given a pledge that the Roman people would
							abandon this City, would burn it, would no longer have its own
							magistrates and senates and laws, but would live under the rule of
							kings. “Heaven forbid!” you say. </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Yes, but the binding force of a capitulation is not lightened by the
							humiliating nature of its terms. If the people can be bound by any
							article, it can by all. The point which some consider important, namely
							whether it is a consul or a Dictator or a praetor who has given the
							undertaking is of no weight whatever. </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> The Samnites themselves made this clear, for it was not enough for them
							that the consuls pledged themselves, they compelled the staff-officers,
							the quaestors, and the military tribunes to do the same.” </p></div><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> “Now no one need say to me, “Why did you pledge yourself
							in that way, seeing that a consul has no right to do so and you were not
							in a position to promise them a peace of which you could not guarantee
							the ratification, or to act on behalf of the people when they had given
							you no mandate to do so?” </p></div><div n="10" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Nothing that happened at Caudium, senators, was dictated by human
							prudence; the gods deprived both the enemy's commanders and your own of
							their senses. We did not exercise sufficient caution in our various
							movements, they in their folly threw away a victory when they had won
							through our folly. </p></div><div n="11" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> They hardly felt safe on the very ground which gave them their victory,
							such a hurry were they in to agree to any conditions if only they could
							deprive of their arms men who were home to arms. </p></div><div n="12" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> If they had been in their senses, would they have had any difficulty in
							sending envoys to Rome whilst they were fetching an old man from his
							home to advise them? Was it impossible for them to enter into
							negotiations with the senate and with the people about securing peace
							and making a treaty? </p></div><div n="13" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> It is a three days' journey for lightly-equipped horsemen, and in the
							meantime there would have been an armistice until the envoys returned
							bringing either peace or the certainty of their victory. Then and then
							only would there have been a binding agreement, because we should have
							made it by order of the people. </p></div><div n="14" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> But you would not have made such an order, nor should we have given such
							a pledge. It was not the will of heaven that there should be any other
							result than this, namely, that the Samnites should be vainly deluded by
							a dream too delightful for their minds </p></div><div n="15" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> to grasp, that the same Fortune which had imprisoned our army should
							also release it, that an illusory victory should be rendered futile by a
							still more illusory peace, and that stipulations should be brought in,
							binding on none but those who actually made them. </p></div><div n="16" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> For what share have you, senators, what share has the people in this
							business? Who can call you to account, who can say that you have
							deceived him? The enemy? You have given no pledge to the enemy. Any
							fellow-citizen? You have not empowered my fellow-citizen to give a
							pledge on your behalf. </p></div><div n="17" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> You are not in my way involved with us, for you have given us no
							mandate; you are not answerable to the Samnites, for you have had no
							dealings with them. </p></div><div n="18" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> It is we who are answerable, pledged as debtors and quite able to
							discharge the debt in respect of what is our own, which we are prepared
							to pay, that is, our own persons and lives. On these let them wreak
							their vengeance, for these let them sharpen their swords and their rage.
						</p></div><div n="19" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> As for the tribunes,. you ought to consider whether it is possible for
							them to be surrendered at once, or whether it ought to be deferred, but
							as for us, T. Veturius and the rest of you who are concerned, let us in
							the meantime offer these worthless lives of ours in discharge of our
							bond, and by our deaths set free the arms of Rome for action.”
						</p></div></div><div n="10" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Both<note anchored="true" type="sum" resp="ed" place="unspecified">Postumius' Advice taken.</note> the speech and the speaker produced
							a great impression on all who heard him, including the tribunes, who
							were so far influenced by what they had heard that they formally placed
							themselves at the disposal of the senate. </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> They immediately resigned their office and were handed over to the
							fetials to be conducted with the rest to Caudium. After the senate had
							passed their resolution, it seemed as though the light of day was once
							more shining on the State. </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> The name of Postumius was in all men's mouths, he was extolled to the
							skies, his conduct was put on a level with the selfsacrifice of P.
							Decius and other splendid deeds of heroism. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>