<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:8.17.2-8.18.7</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:8.17.2-8.18.7</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="8" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="17" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> The Sidicines had got together an immense army, and were evidently
							prepared to fight desperately for their last hope; there was also a
							report that Samnium was being roused into hostilities. </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> A Dictator was accordingly nominated by the consuls on the resolution of
							the senate —P. Cornelius Rufinus; the Master of the Horse was M.
							Antonius. </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Subsequently a religious difficulty arose through an informality in
							their nomination, and they resigned their posts. In consequence of a
							pestilence which followed, it seemed as though all the auspices were
							tainted by that informality, and matters reverted to an interregnum.
						</p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> There were five interreges and under the last one, M. Valerius Corvus,
							the consuls elected were C. Cornelius (for the second time) and Cn.
							Domitius. </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Matters were now quiet, but a rumour of a Gaulish war created as much
							alarm as an actual invasion, and it was decided that a Dictator should
							be appointed. M. Papirius Crassus was nominated, his Master of the Horse
							being P. Valerius Publicola. </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Whilst they were raising a stronger levy than was usual in wars near at
							hand, the reconnoitring parties that had been sent out reported that all
							was quiet amongst the Gauls. </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>For the last two years there had been suspicions of a move ment in
							Samnium in favour of a change of policy, and as a measure of precaution
							the Roman army was not withdrawn from the Sidicine territory. </p></div><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> The landing of Alexander of Epirus near Paestum led the Samnites to make
							common cause with the Lucanians, but their united forces were defeated
							by turn in a pitched battle. </p></div><div n="10" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> He then established friendly relations with Rome, but it is very
							doubtful how far he would have maintained them had his other enterprises
							been equally successful. </p></div><div n="11" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>In this year a census was taken, the censors being Q. Publilius Philo and
							Sp. Postumius. The new citizens were assessed and formed into two
							additional tribes, the Maecian and the Scaptian. </p></div><div n="12" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> L. Papirius, the praetor, secured the passage of a law by which the
							rights of citizenship without the franchise were conferred on the
							inhabitants of Acerrae. These were the military and civil transactions
							for the year. </p></div></div><div n="18" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p><note anchored="true" type="sum" resp="ed" place="unspecified">Roman
								Matrons Guilty of Poisoning.</note> M Claudius Marcellus and T
							Valerius were the new consuls. I find in the annals Flaccus and Potitus
							variously given as the consul's cognomen, but the question is of small
							importance. </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>This year gained an evil notoriety, either through the unhealthy weather
							or through human guilt. I would gladly believe —and the authorities are
							not unanimous on the point — that it is a false story which states that
							those whose deaths made the year notorious for pestilence were really
							carried off by poison. </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> I shall, however, relate the matter as it has been handed down to avoid
							any appearance of impugning the credit of our authorities. </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>The foremost men in the State were being attacked by the same malady, and
							in almost every case with the same fatal results. A maid-servant went to
							Q. Fabius Maximus, one of the curule aediles, and promised to reveal the
							cause of the public mischief if the government would guarantee her
							against any danger in which her discovery might involve her. </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Fabius at once brought the matter to the notice of the consuls and they
							referred it to the senate, who authorised the promise of immunity to be
							given. </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> She then disclosed the fact that the State was suffering through the
							crimes of certain women; those poisons were concocted by Roman matrons,
							and if they would follow her at once she promised that they should catch
							the poisoners in the act. </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> They followed their informant and actually found some women compounding
							poisonous drugs and some poisons already made up. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>