<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:7.41.4-8.1.4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:7.41.4-8.1.4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="7" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="41" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> He then begged the Quirites to grant him one request, which was that no
							one should ever either in jest or earnest bring that matter up against
							any one. A military <foreign xml:lang="lat">Lex Sacrata</foreign>
							              <note anchored="true" n="19" resp="ed" place="unspecified">See note 15 on
								p. 358, Vol. I.</note> was also passed, enacting that no soldier's
							name should be struck off the muster-roll without his consent.<note anchored="true" n="20" resp="ed" place="unspecified"> “They
								deprecated the power of striking their names off the list of
								soldiers, partly because it degraded them to an inferior rank, that
								of the <foreign xml:lang="lat">capite censi</foreign>, who were
								considered unfit to bear arms, and partly because whilst they were
								on military service they were protected from being personally
								attached for debts; and partly, also, because service in Campania
								bore an agreeable aspect and might furnish a poor man with the means
								of relieving himself from his embarrassments.”—Arnold, I. p.
								123.</note>
						            </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> An additional provision was subsequently embodied in it, forbidding any
							one who had once been military tribune from being made to serve
							afterwards as a </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> centurion. This was in consequence of a demand made by the mutineers
							with respect to P. Salonius, who had been every year either military
							tribune or centurion of the first class. They were incensed against him
							because he had always opposed their mutinous projects and had fled from
							Lautulae to avoid being mixed up with </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> them. As this proposal was aimed solely at Salonius the senate refused
							to allow it. Then Salonius himself appealed to the senators not to
							consider his dignity of more importance than the harmony of the State,
							and at his request they ultimately passed </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> it. Another demand just as impudent was that the pay of the cavalry
							should be reduced at that time they were receiving three times the
							infantry pay —because they had acted against the mutineers. </p></div></div><div n="42" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>In addition to these measures I find the following recorded by various
							authorities. </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> L. Genucius, a tribune of the plebs, brought before them a measure
							declaring usury illegal, whilst other resolutions were adopted
							forbidding any one to accept re-election to the same office in less than
							ten years or fill two offices in the same year, and also that both
							consuls might legally be elected from the plebs If all these concessions
							were really made it is quite clear that the revolt possessed
							considerable strength. </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> In other annalists it is stated that Valerius was not nominated
							Dictator, but the matter was entirely arranged by the consuls; also that
							it was not before they came to Rome but in Rome itself that the body of
							conspirators broke out into armed revolt; </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> also that it was not to T. Quinctius' farm but to the house of C.
							Manlius that the nocturnal visit was paid, and that it was Manlius who
							was seized by the conspirators and made their leader, after which they
							marched out to a distance of four miles and entrenched themselves; </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> also that it was not their leaders who made the first suggestions of
							concord, but what happened was that as the two </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> armies advanced towards each other prepared for action the soldiers
							exchanged mutual greetings, and as they drew nearer grasped each other's
							hands and embraced one another, and the consuls, seeing how averse the
							soldiers were from fighting, yielded to circumstances and made proposals
							to the senate for reconciliation and concord. </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Thus the ancient authorities agree in nothing but the simple fact that
							there was a mutiny and that it was suppressed. </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>The report of this disturbance and the seriousness of the war which had
							been commenced with the Samnites made many nationalities averse from an
							alliance with Rome. The Latins had long been faithless to their treaty,
							and in addition to that the Privernates made a sudden incursion and
							devastated the neighbouring Roman colonies of Norba and Setia. </p></div></div></div><div n="8" subtype="book" type="textpart"><head>Book VIII</head><head>B.C. <date when="-0341">341</date>-<date when="-0321">321</date>
				        </head><head>First Samnite War and settlement of Latium</head><div n="1" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p><note anchored="true" type="sum" resp="ed" place="unspecified">War with
								the Privernates and Volscians —Peace with the Samnites.</note> When
							messengers from Setia and Norba arrived in Rome with complaints of a
							defeat they had suffered at the hands of the revolted Privernates, the
							consulship was held by C. </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Plautius (for the second time) and L. Aemilius Mamercus. News was also
							brought that an army of Volscians led by the people of Antium </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> had concentrated at Satricum. Both wars fell to Plautius. He marched
							first to Privernum and at once engaged the enemy who were defeated
							without much trouble. The town was captured and then given back to the
							Privernates after a strong garrison had been </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> placed in it; two-thirds of their territory were confiscated. Then the
							victorious army was led against the Antiates at Satricum. There a battle
							was fought with terrible bloodshed on both sides, and whilst the result
							was still uncertain night separated the combatants. The Romans were in
							no way discouraged by the indecisiveness of </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>