<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:6.41.3-6.42.2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:6.41.3-6.42.2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="6" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="41" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Not to mention Licinius and Sextius, whose years of uninterrupted power
							you number up as though they were kings in the Capitol<note anchored="true" n="10" resp="ed" place="unspecified"><emph>kings in the Capitol</emph> —Referring probably to the statues
								of the kings which were set up on pedestals in the Capitol, but at a
								later date than Livy is dealing with here.</note>, who is there in
							the State to-day in such humble circumstances as not to find the path to
							the consulship made easier by the opportunities offered in that measure
							for him than it is for us and our children? Even when you sometimes wish
							to elect us you will not have the power; those people you will be
							compelled to elect, even if you do not wish to do so.”
							“Enough has been said about the indignity of the </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> thing. Questions of dignity, however, only concern men; what shall I say
							about the duties of religion and the auspices, the contempt and
							profanation of which specially concern the gods? Who is there who knows
							not that it was under auspices that this City was founded, that only
							after auspices have been taken is anything done in war or peace, at home
							or in the </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> field? Who have the right to take the auspices in accordance with the
							usage of our fathers? The patricians, surely, for not a single plebeian
							magistrate is elected under </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> auspices. So exclusively do the auspices belong to us that not only do
							the people when electing patrician magistrates elect them only when the
							auspices are favourable, but even we, when, independently of the people,
							we are choosing an interrex, only do so after the auspices have been
							taken: we as private citizens have the auspices which your order does
							not possess even as </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> magistrates. What else is the man doing who by the creation of plebeian
							consuls takes away the auspices from the patricians who alone can
							possess them —what else, I ask, is he doing but depriving the State of
							the auspices? Now, men are at liberty to mock at our religious </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> fears. “What does it matter if the sacred chickens do not feed,
							if they hesitate to come out of their coop, if a bird has shrieked
							ominously?” These are small matters, but it was by not despising
							these small matters that our ancestors have achieved the supreme
							greatness of this State. Now, as though there were no need of securing
							peace with the gods, we are polluting all ceremonial </p></div><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> acts. Are pontiffs, augurs, kings for sacrifice to be appointed
							indiscriminately? Are we to place the mitre of the Flamen of Jupiter
							upon any one's head provided only he be a man? Are we to hand over the
							sacred shields, the shrines, the gods, and the care of their worship to
							men to whom it would be impious to entrust </p></div><div n="10" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> them? Are laws no longer to be passed, or magistrates elected in
							accordance with the auspices? Are the senate no longer to authorise the
							Assembly of centuries, or the Assembly of curies? Are Sextius and
							Licinius to reign in this City of Rome as though they were a second
							Romulus, a second Tatius, because they give away other people's money
							and other people's </p></div><div n="11" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> lands? So great a charm is felt in preying upon other people's fortunes,
							that it has not occurred to them that by expelling the occupiers from
							their lands under the one law vast solitudes will be created, whilst by
							the action of the other all credit will be destroyed and with it all
							human society </p></div><div n="12" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> abolished. For every reason I consider that these proposals ought to be
							rejected, and may heaven guide you to a right decision!” </p></div></div><div n="42" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>The speech of Appius only availed to effect the postponement of the
							voting. </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Sextius and Licinius were re-elected for the tenth time. They carried a
							law providing that of the ten keepers of the Sibylline Books, five
							should be chosen from the patricians and five from the plebeians. This
							was regarded as a further step towards opening the path to the
							consulship. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>