<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:6.10.9-6.12.7</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:6.10.9-6.12.7</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="6" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="10" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>The senate regarded this reply as affording a justifiable ground for war,
							but the present time was deemed inopportune. </p></div></div><div n="11" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>The<note anchored="true" type="sum" resp="ed" place="unspecified">The
								Treason of M. Manlius Capitolinus.</note> consular tribunes who
							succeeded were A. Manlius, P. Cornelius, T and L. Quinctius Capitolinus,
							L. Papirius Cursor (for the second time&gt;, and C. Sergius (for the
							second time). In this year a serious war broke out, and a still more
							serious disturbance at home. </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> The war was begun by the Volscians, aided by the revolted Latins and
							Hernici. The domestic trouble arose in a quarter where it was least to
							be apprehended, from a man of patrician birth and brilliant reputation
							—M. Manlius Capitolinus . </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Full of pride and presumption, he looked down upon the foremost men with
							scorn; one in particular he regarded with envious eyes, a man
							conspicuous for his distinctions and his merits —M. Furius Camillus.
						</p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> He bitterly resented this man's unique position amongst the magistrates
							and in the affections of the army, and declared that he was now such a
							superior person that he treated those who had been appointed under the
							same auspices as himself, not as his colleagues, but as his servants,
							and yet if any one would form a just judgment he would see that M.
							Furius could not possibly have rescued his country. <note anchored="true" n="5" resp="ed" place="unspecified"><emph>His country</emph>. —The magistrates, the senators, the
								fighting men —all that constituted “his country” —were
								shut up in the Capitol and owed their preservation to
								Manlius.</note> When it was beleaguered by the enemy had not he,
							Manlius, saved the </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Capitol and the Citadel? Camillus attacked the Gauls while they were off
							their guard, their minds pre-occupied with obtaining the gold and
							securing peace; <emph>he</emph>, on the other hand, had driven them off
							when they were armed for battle and actually capturing the Citadel.
							Camillus' glory was shared by every man who conquered with him, whereas
							no mortal man could obviously claim any </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> part in <emph>his</emph> victory. With his head full of these notions
							and being unfortunately a man of headstrong and passionate nature, he
							found that his influence was not so powerful with the patricians as he
							thought it ought to be, so he went over to the plebs —the first
							patrician to do so —and adopted the political </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> methods of their magistrates. He abused the senate and courted the
							populace and, impelled by the breeze of popular favour more than by
							conviction or judgment, </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> preferred notoriety to respectability. Not content with the agrarian
							laws which had hitherto always served the tribunes of the plebs as the
							material for their agitation, he began to undermine the whole system of
							credit for he saw that the laws of debt caused more irritation than the
							others; they not only threatened poverty and disgrace, but they
							terrified the freeman with the prospect </p></div><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> of fetters and imprisonment. And, as a matter of fact, a vast amount of
							debt had been contracted owing to the expense of building, an expense
							most ruinous even to the rich. It became, therefore, a question of
							arming the government with stronger powers, and the Volscian war,
							serious in itself but made much more so by the defection of the Latins
							and Hernici, was put forward </p></div><div n="10" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> as the ostensible reason. It was, however, the revolutionary designs of
							Manlius that mainly decided the senate to nominate a Dictator. A.
							Cornelius Cossus was nominated and he named T. Quinctius Capitolinus as
							his Master of the Horse. </p></div></div><div n="12" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Although<note anchored="true" type="sum" resp="ed" place="unspecified">The
								Volscian War.</note> the Dictator recognised that a more difficult
							contest lay before him at home than abroad, he enrolled his troops and
							proceeded to the Pomptine territory, which, he heard, had been invaded
							by the Volscians. Either he considered it necessary to take prompt
							military measures or he hoped to strengthen his hands as Dictator by a
							victory and a triumph. </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>I have no doubt that my readers will be tired of such a long record of
							incessant wars with the Volscians, but they will also be struck with the
							same difficulty which I have myself felt whilst examining the
							authorities who lived nearer to the period, namely, from what source did
							the Volscians obtain sufficient soldiers after so many defeats? </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Since this point has been passed over by the ancient writers, what can I
							do more than express an opinion such as any one may form from his own
							inferences? </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Probably, in the interval between one war and another, they trained each
							fresh generation against the renewal of hostilities, as is now done in
							the enlistment of Roman troops, or their armies were not always drawn
							from the same districts, though it was always the same nation that
							carried on the war, or there must have been an innumerable free
							population in those districts which </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> are barely now kept from desolation by the scanty tillage of Roman
							slaves, with hardly so much as a miserably small recruiting ground for
							soldiers left. </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> At all events, the authorities are unanimous in asserting that the
							Volscians had an immense army in spite of their having been so lately
							crippled by the successes of Camillus. Their numbers were increased by
							the Latins and Hernici, as well as by a body of Circeians, and even by a
							contingent from Velitrae, where there was a Roman colony. </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>On the day he arrived the Dictator formed his camp. On the, morrow, after
							taking the auspices and supplicating the favour of the gods by sacrifice
							and prayer, he advanced in high spirits to the soldiers who were already
							in the early dawn arming themselves according to orders against the
							moment when the signal for battle should be given. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>