<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:4.29.5-4.30.8</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:4.29.5-4.30.8</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="4" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="29" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Some writers have cast a gloom over the memory of this glorious
							dictatorship by handing down a tradition that the Dictator's son, who,
							seeing an opportunity for fighting to advantage, had left his post
							against orders, was beheaded by his father, though victorious. </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> I prefer to disbelieve the story, and am at liberty to do so, as
							opinions differ. An argument against it is that such cruel displays of
							authority are called “Manlian” not
							“Postumian,” for it is the first man who practiced such
							severity to whom the stigma would have been affixed. Moreover, Manlius
							received the soubriquet of “Imperiosus”; Postumius was not
							distinguished by any invidious epithet.<note anchored="true" n="18" resp="ed" place="unspecified"><emph>Manlius.</emph> The incident alluded to is recorded by Livy in
								his eighth book. Titus Manlius, in his war with the Latins, gave
								strict injunctions that none should leave his station or fight
								without orders. His son, who was also called Titus Manlius, provoked
								by the challenge of a Tusculan officer, engaged him in single combat
								and slew him. In spite of this brilliant display of courage his
								father ordered him, as a punishment for his disobedience, to be
								beheaded. “Manlian orders” became subsequently a
								proverbial expression for intolerably harsh military
								discipline.</note> The other consul, C. Julius, dedicated the temple
							of Apollo in his colleague's absence, without waiting to draw lots with
							him as to who should do it. </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Quinctius was very angry at this, and after he had disbanded his army
							and returned to the City, he laid a protest before the senate, but
							nothing came of it. In this year so memorable for great achievements an
							incident occurred which at the time seemed to have little to do with
							Rome. </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Owing to disturbances amongst the Sicilians, the Carthaginians, who were
							one day to be such powerful enemies, transported an army into Sicily for
							the first time to assist one of the contending parties. </p></div></div><div n="30" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>In<note anchored="true" type="sum" resp="ed" place="unspecified">Truce
								with the Aequi —Internal Affairs.</note> the City the tribunes made
							great efforts to secure the election of consular tribunes for the next
							year, but they failed. L. Papirius Crassus and L. Julius were made
							consuls. Envoys came from the Aequi to ask from the senate a treaty as
							between independent States; instead of this they were offered peace on
							condition they acknowledged the supremacy of Rome; they obtained a truce
							for eight </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> years. After the defeat which the Volscians had sustained on Algidus,
							their State was distracted by obstinate and bitter quarrels between the
							advocates of war and those of </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> peace. There was quiet for Rome in all </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> quarters. The tribunes were preparing a popular measure to fix the scale
							of fines, but one of their body betrayed the fact to the consuls, who
							anticipated the tribunes by bringing it in themselves. The new consuls
							were L. Sergius Fidenas, for the second time, and Hostius Lucretius
							Tricipitinus. Nothing worth recording took place in their </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> consulship. They were followed by A. Cornelius Cossus, and T. Quinctius
							Poenus for the second time. The Veientines made inroads into the Roman
							territory, and it was rumoured that some of the Fidenates had taken part
							in </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> them. L. Sergius, Q. Servilius, and Mamercus Aemilius were commissioned
							to investigate the affair. Some were interned at Ostia, as they were
							unable to account satisfactorily for their absence from Fidenae at that
						</p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> time. The number of colonists was increased, and the lands of those who
							had perished in the war were assigned to them. Very great distress was
							caused this year by a </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> drought. Not only was there an absence of water from the heavens, but
							the earth, through lack of its natural moisture, barely sufficed to keep
							the rivers flowing. In some cases the want of water made the cattle die
							of thirst round the dried-up springs and brooks, in others they were
							carried off by the </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>