<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:10.7.3-10.8.4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:10.7.3-10.8.4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="10" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="7" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>He began by recalling the scene which many of those present had
							witnessed, when the elder Decius, his father, vested in the Gabine
								cincture<note anchored="true" n="3" resp="ed" place="unspecified">See
								note II to Book V.</note> and standing upon a spear, solemnly
							devoted himself on behalf of the legions and people of Rome. </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> He proceeded, “The offering which the consul Decius made on that
							occasion was in the eyes of the immortal gods as pure and holy as that
							of his colleague, T. Manlius, would have been if he had devoted himself.
							Could not that Decius also have been fitly chosen to exercise priestly
							functions on behalf of the Roman people? </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> And for me, are you afraid that the gods will not listen to my prayers
							as they do to those of Appius Claudius? Does he perform his private
							devotions with a purer mind or worship the gods in a more religious
							spirit than I do? </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Who has ever had occasion to regret the vows which have been made on
							behalf of the commonwealth by so many plebeian consuls, so many plebeian
							Dictators, when they were going to take command of their armies, or when
							they were actually engaged in battle? </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Count up the commanders in all the years since war was for the first
							time waged under the leadership and auspices of plebeians, you will find
							as many triumphs as commanders. The plebeians, too, have their nobility
							and have no cause to be dissatisfied with them. </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> You may be quite certain that, if a war were suddenly to break out now,
							the senate and people of Rome would not put more confidence in a general
							because he was a patrician than in one who happened to be a plebeian.
						</p></div><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Now, if this is the case, who in heaven or earth could regard it as an
							indignity that the men whom you have honoured with curule chairs, with
							the <foreign xml:lang="lat">toga praetexta</foreign>, the <foreign xml:lang="lat">tunica palmata</foreign>, and the <foreign xml:lang="lat">toga
								picta</foreign>, <note anchored="true" n="4" resp="ed" place="unspecified">for the <foreign xml:lang="lat">toga
									praetexta</foreign>, see note 2 to Book I. The <foreign xml:lang="lat">tunica palmata</foreign> was an under-garment
								embroidered with figures of victory and palm branches. Over this was
								thrown the <foreign xml:lang="lat">toga picta</foreign>, a purple toga
								embroidered with gold. These were the vestments of the Capitoline
								Jupiter, and were lent from the Capitol to be worn by the victorious
								general while he celebrated his triumph. The triumphal crown —stones
								set in gold —was held over him by an official as he rode in the
								chariot drawn by four white horses which formed the centre of the
								procession. The laurel wreath he wore upon his brows.</note>with the
							triumphal crown and the laurel wreath, the men upon whose houses you
							have conferred special distinction by affixing to them the spoils taken
							from the enemy —that these men, I say, should have in addition to their
							other marks of rank the insignia of the pontiffs and </p></div><div n="10" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> the augurs? A triumphing general drives through the City in a gilded
							chariot, apparelled in the splendid vestments of Jupiter Optimus Maximus
							After this he goes up to the Capitol; is he not to be seen there with
								<foreign xml:lang="lat">capis</foreign> and <foreign xml:lang="lat">lituus</foreign>
							              <note anchored="true" n="5" resp="ed" place="unspecified">The <foreign xml:lang="lat">capis</foreign> was a dish used in sacrificing, here
								denoting the priest. The <foreign xml:lang="lat">lituus</foreign> (see
								Vol. I. p. 22) similarly denoted the augur.</note>? Is it to be
							regarded as an indignity, if he with veiled head slay a victim, or from
							his place on the citadel take </p></div><div n="11" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> an augury? And if in the inscription on his bust the words
							“consulship,” “censorship,”
							“triumph” are read without arousing any indignation, in
							what mood will the reader regard the words which you are going to add,
							“augurship” </p></div><div n="12" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> and “pontificate”? I do indeed hope, please heaven, that,
							thanks to the good will of the Roman people, we now possess sufficient
							dignity to be capable of conferring as much honour on the priesthood as
							we shall receive. For the sake of the gods as much as for ourselves let
							us insist that as we worship them now as private individuals so we may
							worship them for the future as officials of the State.” </p></div></div><div n="8" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> “But why have I so far been assuming that the question of the
							patricians and the priesthood is still an open one, and that we are not
							yet in possession of the highest of all offices? </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> We see plebeians amongst the ten keepers of the Sacred Books, acting as
							interpreters of the Sibyl's runes and the Fates of this people; we see
							them, too, presiding over the sacrifices and other rites connected with
							Apollo. </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> No injustice was inflicted on the patricians when an addition was made
							to the number of the keepers of the Sacred Books on the demand of the
							plebeians. </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> None has been inflicted now, when a strong and capable tribune has
							created five more posts for augurs and four more for priests, which are
							to be filled by plebeians, not, Appius, with the design of ousting you
							patricians from your places, but in order that the plebs may assist you
							in the conduct of divine matters as they do to the utmost of their power
							in the administration of human affairs.” </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>