<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0893.phi004.perseus-eng2:2.3.43-2.3.77</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0893.phi004.perseus-eng2:2.3.43-2.3.77</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="en"><body><div xml:lang="lat" type="edition" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0893.phi004.perseus-eng2"><div type="textpart" n="2" subtype="book"><div type="textpart" n="3" subtype="poem"><div type="textpart" n="43" subtype="card"><p>The school and sect of Chrysippus<note anchored="true" n="32" resp="San"><p><cit><quote xml:lang="lat">Chrysippi porticus.</quote><bibl n="Hor. S. 2.3.44"/></cit> The <foreign xml:lang="lat">Porticus</foreign> was a famous gallery at <placeName key="tgn,7001393">Athens</placeName>, where <placeName key="tgn,2786861">Zeno</placeName>
                              held his school, which, from the Greek word <foreign xml:lang="grc">στόα</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="lat">Porticus</foreign>, took the name of Stoic.</p></note> deem every man mad, whom vicious folly or the ignorance of truth drives blindly
      forward. This definition takes in whole nations, this even great kings, the wise man [alone]
      excepted. Now learn, why all those, who have fixed the name of madman upon you, are as
      senseless as yourself. As in the woods, where a mistake makes people wander about from the
      proper path; one goes out of the way to the right; another to the left; there is the same
      blunder on both sides, only the illusion is in different directions: in this manner imagine
      yourself mad; so that he, who derides you, hangs his tail,<note anchored="true" n="33" resp="Fran"><p><cit><quote xml:lang="lat">Caudam trahat.</quote><bibl n="Hor. S. 2.3.53"/></cit> A metaphor, as the old commentator well observes, taken from a custom among children,
        who tied a tail behind a person whom they had a mind to laugh at.</p></note> not one jot wiser than yourself. There is one species of folly, that dreads things not
      in the least formidable; insomuch that it will complain of fires, and rocks, and rivers
      opposing it in the open plain; there is another different from this, but not a whit more
      approaching to wisdom, that runs headlong through the midst of flames and floods. Let the
      loving mother, the virtuous sister, the father, the wife, together with all the relations [of
      a man possessed with this latter folly], cry out: "Here is a deep ditch; here is a prodigious
      rock; take care of yourself:" he would give no more attention, than did the drunken
       Fufius<note anchored="true" n="34" resp="TAB"><p>Fufius was an actor who, playing the character of Ilione, was supposed to be asleep, when
        the ghost of her son Polydore called to her, "Dear mother, hear me." Fufius, having drunk
        too much, fell really asleep; and Catienus, who played Polydore, having called to him,
        without waking him, the whole house, as if each of them was a Catienus, cried out, "Dear
        mother, hear me," The number of twelve hundred is a pleasant exaggeration. Accius or
        Pacuvius wrote a tragedy on the story of Ilione, and the whole passage is preserved to us in
         <placeName key="tgn,2068515">Cicero</placeName>: <quote xml:lang="lat"><lg type="trimeter"><l>Mater, te adpello, tu quae somno curam suspensam levas,</l><l>Neque te mei miseret, surge et sepeli natum</l><l>Priusquam ferae volucresque.</l></lg></quote>
                           </p></note> some time ago, when he overslept the character of Ilione, twelve hundred Catieni at
      the same time roaring out, O mother, I call you to my aid. I will demonstrate to you, that the
      generality of all mankind are mad in the commission of some folly similar to this.</p><p>Damasippus is mad for purchasing antique statues: but is Damasippus' creditor in his senses?
      Well, suppose I should say to you: receive this,<note anchored="true" n="35" resp="Dac"><p>Stertinius goes on to prove, not only that Damasippus is not a fool, in buying statues,
        since he does not pay for them, but that he would be a fool indeed, to refuse the favor
        which Mercury offers him, in the credulity of Perillius.</p></note> which you can never repay: will you be a madman, if you receive it; or would you be
      more absurd for rejecting a booty, which propitious Mercury offers? Take bond,<note anchored="true" n="36" resp="McCaul"><p><foreign xml:lang="lat">Scribere</foreign> is sometimes used in the sense "to acknowledge the
        receipt of a sum borrowed"; hence some have supposed that the meaning here is <foreign xml:lang="lat">scribe te decem sestertia accepisse a Nerio</foreign>, as said by Damasippus'
        creditor. Thus, Nerius is a banker, with whom Damasippus' creditor (Perillius) had lodged
        his money, and in whose books Damasippus, when drawing the ten sestertia, was required to
        acknowledge (<foreign xml:lang="lat">scribere</foreign>) the receipt of so much money. But I
        prefer Gesner's interpretation, <foreign xml:lang="lat">scribe decem tabulas a Nerio</foreign>,
        i.e. "draw out ten bonds with all the niceties of Nerius," a usurer, well known for his care
        in wording the bonds, so that there could be no evasion.</p></note> like the banker Nerius, for ten thousand sesterces; it will not signify: add the forms
      of Cicuta,<note anchored="true" n="37" resp="ed. Dubl."><p>Cicuta was an old notary, who knew too well the practice of bonds, to neglect any clauses
        or forms, capable of finding these engagements. Such is the force of <cit><quote xml:lang="lat">nodosus</quote><bibl n="Hor. S. 2.3.70"/></cit>. <foreign xml:lang="lat">Tabulae</foreign> are the bonds or contracts, from whence
        notaries were called <foreign xml:lang="lat">tabularii</foreign>.</p></note> so versed in the knotty points of law: add a thousand obligations: yet this wicked
      Proteus will evade all these ties. When you shall drag him to justice, laughing as if his
      cheeks were none of his own;<note anchored="true" n="38" resp="TAB"><p>People are not usually too careful of what belongs to others, from whence this kind of
        proverbial expression, "laughing with another man's cheeks." Dacier very well observes, that
        our poet hath translated it from Homer, when he says of Penelope's lovers, <cit><quote xml:lang="grc">Οἴ δ' ἤδη γναθμοῖσι γελώων ἀλλορίοισι</quote><bibl n="Hom. Od. 20.346">ODYSS. lib. xx. v. 346.</bibl></cit>
                           </p></note> he will be transformed into a boar, sometimes into a bird, sometimes into a stone, and
      when he pleases into a tree. If to conduct one's affairs badly be the part of a the madman;
      and the reverse, that of a man well in his senses; brain of Perillius (believe me), who orders
      you [that sum of money], which you can never repay, is much more unsound [than yours].
       
</p></div><div type="textpart" n="77" subtype="card"><p>Whoever grows pale with evil ambition, or the love of money: whoever is heated with luxury,
      or gloomy superstition, or any other disease of the mind, I command him to adjust his garment
      and attend: hither, all of ye, come near me in order, while I convince you that you are mad.</p><p>By far the largest portion of hellebore is to be administered to the covetous: I know not,
      whether reason does not consign all Anticyra to their use. The heirs of Staberius engraved the
      sum [which he left them] upon his tomb: unless they had acted in this manner, they were under
      an obligation<note anchored="true" n="39" resp="TAB"><p><cit><quote xml:lang="lat">Damnati populo.</quote><bibl n="Hor. S. 2.3.86"/></cit> Alluding to the form of the will, in which the testator required any thing of his
        heir, <foreign xml:lang="lat">HERES DAMNAS ESTO.</foreign>
                           </p></note> to exhibit a hundred pair of gladiators to the people, beside an entertainment
      according to the direction of Arrius; and as much corn as is cut in <placeName key="tgn,7001242">Africa</placeName>. Whether I have willed this rightly or wrongly, it was
      my will; be not severe against me, [cries the testator]. I imagine the provident mind of
      Staberius foresaw this. What then did he mean, when he appointed by will that his heirs should
      engrave the sum of their patrimony upon his tomb-stone? As long as he lived, he deemed poverty
      a great vice, and nothing did he more industriously avoid: insomuch that, had he died less
      rich by one farthing, the more iniquitous would he have appeared to himself. For every thing,
      virtue, fame, glory, divine and human affairs, are subservient to the attraction of riches;
      which whoever shall have accumulated, shall be illustrious, brave, just — What, wise
      too? Ay, and a king, and whatever else he pleases. This he was in hopes would greatly redound
      to his praise, as if it had been an acquisition of his virtue. In what respect did the Grecian
       Aristippus<note anchored="true" n="40" resp="Dac, San"><p>Aristippus was the chief of the Cyrenaic sect. He held that pleasure was the <foreign xml:lang="lat">summum bonum</foreign>, and virtue only valuable as it was a means of gaining
        that pleasure. Epicurus was perfectly rigid when compared to his master Aristippus, and by
        our author's manner of mentioning him in many parts of his works, we may believe he was no
        enemy to so convenient a philosophy. Staberius, who was a Stoic, has given an ill-natured
        turn to this story, which is much commended by Cicero; for Aristippus had only one slave,
        whom he commanded to throw away as much of his money as was too heavy to carry.</p></note> act like this; who ordered his slaves to throw away his gold in the midst of
       <placeName key="tgn,1000172">Libya</placeName>; because, encumbered with the burden, they
      traveled too slowly? Which is the greater madman of these two? An example is nothing to the
      purpose, that decides one controversy by creating another. If any person were to buy lyres,
      and [when he had bought them] to stow them in one place, though neither addicted to the lyre
      nor to any one muse whatsoever: if a man were [to buy] paring-knives and lasts, and were no
      shoemaker; sails fit for navigation, and were averse to merchandising; he would every where
      deservedly be styled delirious, and out of his senses. How does he differ from these, who
      hoards up cash and gold [and] knows not how to use them when accumulated, and is afraid to
      touch them as if they were consecrated? If any person before a great heap of corn should keep
      perpetual watch with a long club, and, though the owner of it, and hungry, should not dare to
      take a single grain from it; and should rather feed upon bitter leaves: if, while a thousand
      hogsheads of Chian, or old Falernian, is stored up within (nay, that is nothing —
      three hundred thousand), he drink nothing, but what is mere sharp vinegar: again —
      if, wanting but one year of eighty, he should lie upon straw, who has bed-clothes rotting in
      his chest, the food of worms and moths; he would seem mad, belike, but to few persons: because
      the greatest part of mankind labors under the same malady. 
</p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>