<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi014.perseus-eng2:31-40</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi014.perseus-eng2:31-40</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi014.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="31" resp="perseus"><p> But Cato is busy proving that we are making too much of all
    these things in our speech; and that we have forgotten that that Mithridatic war was carried on
    against nothing better than women. However, my opinion is very different, O judges; and I will
    say a little on that subject; for my cause does not depend on that. 
   <milestone unit="para"/>For if all the wars which we have carried on against the Greeks are to be despised, then let
    the triumph of Marcus Curius over king Pyrrhus be derided; and that of Titus Flamininus over
    Philip; and that of Marcus Fulvius over the Aetolians; and that of Lucius Paullus over king
    Perses; and that of Quintus Metellus over the false Philip; and that of Lucius Mummius over the
    Corinthians. But, if all these wars were of the greatest importance, and if our victories in
    them were most acceptable, then why are the Asiatic nations and that Asiatic enemy despised by
    you? But, from our records of ancient deeds; I see that the Roman people carried on a most
    important war with Antiochus; the conqueror in which war, Lucius Scipio, who had already gained
    great glory when acting in conjunction with his brother Publius, assumed the same honour himself
    by taking a surname from Asia, as his brother did, who, having subdued Africa, paraded his
    conquest by the assumption of the name of Africanus. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="32" resp="perseus"><p> And in
    that war the renown of your ancestor Marcus Cato was very conspicuous; but he, if he was, as I
    make no doubt that he was, a man of the same character as I see that you are, would never have
    gone to that war, if he had thought that it was only going to be a war against women. Nor would
    the senate have prevailed on Publius Africanus to go as lieutenant to his brother, when he
    himself; a little while before, having forced Hannibal out of Italy, having driven him out of
    Africa, and having crushed the power of Carthage, had delivered the republic from the greatest
    dangers, if that war had not been considered an important and formidable war. <milestone unit="para"/><milestone n="15" unit="chapter"/>
    But if you diligently consider what the power of Mithridates was, and what his exploits were,
    and what sort or a man he was himself; you will in truth prefer this king to all the kings with
    whom the Roman people has ever waged war;—a man whom Lucius Sulla,—not a very inexperienced
    general, to say the least of it—at the head of a numerous and powerful army, after a severe
    battle, allowed to depart having made peace with him, though he had overrun all Asia with war:
    whom Lucius Murena, my client's father, after having <pb n="346"/> warred against him with the
    greatest vigour and vigilance, left greatly checked indeed, but not overwhelmed: a king, who,
    having taken several years to perfect his system and to strengthen his warlike resources, became
    so powerful and enterprising that he thought himself able to unite the Atlantic to the Black
    Sea, and to combine the forces of Sertorius with his own. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="33" resp="perseus"><p> And
    when two consuls had been sent to that war, with the view of one pursuing Mithridates, and the
    other protecting Bithynia, the disasters which befell one of them by land and sea greatly
    increased the power and reputation of the king. But the exploits of Lucius Lucullus were such
    that it is impossible to mention any war which was more important, or in which greater abilities
    and valour were displayed. For when the violence of the entire war had broken against the walls
    of Cyzicus, and as Mithridates thought that he should find that city the door of Asia, and that
    if that were once broken down and forced, the whole province would be open to him, everything
    was so managed by Lucullus that the city of our most faithful allies was defended, and all the
    forces of the king were wasted away by the length of the siege, what more need I say? Do you
    think that that naval battle at Tenedos, when the enemy's fleet were hastening on with rapid
    course and under most eager admirals towards Italy, full of hope and courage, was a trifling
    engagement—an insignificant contest? I will say nothing of battles; I pass over the sieges of
    towns. Being at length expelled from his kingdom, still his wisdom and his influence were so
    great that combining his forces with those of the king of Armenia, he reappeared with new armies
    and new resources of every kind. <milestone unit="para"/><milestone n="16" unit="chapter"/>
   And if it wore my business now to speak of the achievements of our army and of our general, I
    might mention many most important battles. But that is not the present question. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="34" resp="perseus"><p> This I do say:—If this war, and this enemy,—if that king was a proper
    object for contempt the senate and Roman people would not have thought it one to be undertaken
    with such care, nor would they have carried it on for so many years, nor would the glory of
    Lucullus be as great as it is. Nor would the Roman people have entrusted the care of putting a
    finishing stroke to it to Cnaeus Pompeius; though of all his battles, numberless as they are,
    that appears to me to have been the most desperate and to have been maintained on both sides
    with the greatest vigour, which he fought against the king. And when Mithridates had escaped
    from that battle, and had fled to the Bosphorus, a place which no army could approach, still,
    even in the extremity of his fortunes, and as a fugitive, he retained the name of a king.
    Therefore, Pompeius himself; having taken possession of his kingdom, having driven the enemy
    away from all his coasts, and from all his usual places of resort still thought that so much
    depended on his single life, that though, by his victory, he had got possession of everything
    which he had possessed, or had approached, or even had hoped for, still he did not think the war
    entirely over till he drove him from life also. And do you, O Cato, think lightly of this man as
    an enemy, when so many generals warred against him for so many years, with so long a series of
    battles? when, though driven out and expelled from his kingdom, his life was still thought of
    such importance, that it was not till the news arrived of his death, that we thought the war
    over? We then say in defence of Lucius Murena, that as a lieutenant in this war he approved
    himself a man of the greatest courage, of singular military skill, and of the greatest
    perseverance; and that all his conduct at that time gave him no less a title to obtain the
    consulship than this forensic industry of ours gave us. <milestone n="17" unit="chapter"/></p></div><milestone unit="para"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="35" resp="perseus"><p>
   “But in the standing for the praetorship, Servius was elected first.” Are you going (as if you
    were arguing on some written bond) to contend with the people that whatever place of honour they
    have once given any one, that same rank they are bound to give him in all other honours? For
    what sea, what Euripus do you think exists, which is liable to such commotions,—to such great
    and various agitations of waves, as the storms and tides by which the <foreign xml:lang="lat">comitia</foreign> are influenced? The interval of one day,—the lapse of one night—often throws
    everything into confusion. The slightest breeze of rumour sometimes changes the entire opinions
    of people. Often, even, everything is done without any apparent cause, in a manner entirely at
    variance with the opinions that have been expressed, or that indeed, are really entertained; so
    that sometimes the people marvels that that has been done which has been done, as if it were not
    itself that has done it. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="36" resp="perseus"><p> Nothing is more uncertain than the
    common people,—nothing more obscure than men's wishes,—nothing more treacherous <pb n="348"/>
    than the whole nature of the <foreign xml:lang="lat">comitia</foreign>. Who expected that Lucius
    Philippus, a man of the greatest abilities, and industry, and popularity, and nobleness of
    birth, could be beaten by Marcus Herennius? who dreamt of Quintus Catulus, a man eminent for all
    the politer virtues, for wisdom and for integrity, being beaten by Cnaeus Mallius? or Marcus
    Scaurus, a man of the highest character, an illustrious citizen, a most intrepid senator, by
    Quintus Maximus? Not only none of all these things were expected to happen, but not even when
    they had happened could anyone possibly make out why they had happened. For as storms arise,
    often being heralded by some well-known token in the heavens, but often also quite unexpectedly
    from no imaginable reason, but from some unintelligible cause; so in the popular tempests of the
     <foreign xml:lang="lat">comitia</foreign> you may often understand by what signs a storm was
    first raised, but often, too, the cause is so obscure, that the tempest appears to have been
    raised by chance. <milestone n="18" unit="chapter"/></p></div><milestone unit="para"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="37" resp="perseus"><p>
   But yet if an account of them must be given, two qualities were particularly missed in the
    praetorship, the existence of which in Murena now was of the greatest use to him in standing for
    the consulship: one was the expectation of a largess, which had got abroad through some rumour,
    and owing to the zeal and conversation of some of his competitors; the other, that those men who
    had been witnesses of all his liberality and virtue in the province and in the discharge of his
    office as lieutenant, had not yet left Rome. Fortune reserved each of these advantages for him,
    to aid him in his application for the consulship. For the army of Lucius Lucullus, which had
    come hither for his triumph, was also present at the <foreign xml:lang="lat">comitia</foreign> in
    aid of Lucius Murena, and his praetorship afforded a most splendid proof of his liberality, of
    which there was no mention when he was standing for the praetorship. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="38" resp="perseus"><p> Do these things appear to you trifling supports and aids towards obtaining the
    consulship? Is the good-will of the soldiery a trifle? who are both intrinsically powerful
    through their own numbers, and also by their influence among their connections, and who in
    declaring a consul have great weight among the entire Roman people. Are the votes of the army a
    trifle? No; for it is generals, and not interpreters of words, who are elected at the consular
     <foreign xml:lang="lat">comitia</foreign>. Most influential, then, is such a speech as this—“He
    refreshed me when I was wounded. He gave me a share of the plunder. He was the general when we
    took that camp—when we fought that battle. He never imposed harder work on the soldier than he
    underwent himself. He was as fortunate as he is brave.” What weight do you not suppose this must
    have to gaining a reputation and good-will among men? Indeed, if there is a sort of superstition
    in the <foreign xml:lang="lat">comitia</foreign>, that up to this time the omen to be drawn from
    the vote of the prerogative <note anchored="true">In the <foreign xml:lang="lat">comitia
      centuriata</foreign> the people voted in their centuries; the order in which the centuries
     voted was decided by lot, and that which gave it a vote first was called the <foreign xml:lang="lat">centuria praerogativa</foreign>. The question of a <foreign xml:lang="lat">tribus
      praerogativa</foreign> is a more disputed point; but on this see Smith, Dict. Ant. p. 997, v.
      <foreign xml:lang="lat">Tribus</foreign>, (Roman.)</note> tribe has always proved true, what
    wonder is there that in such a meeting the reputation of good fortune and such discourse as this
    has had the greatest weight? <milestone unit="para"/><milestone n="19" unit="chapter"/>
   But if you think these things trifling, though they are most important; and if you prefer the
    votes of these quiet citizens to those of the soldiers; at all events, you cannot think lightly
    of the beauty of the games exhibited by this man, and the magnificence of his theatrical
    spectacles; and these things were of great use to him in this last contest. For why need I tell
    you that the people and the great mass of ignorant men are exceedingly taken with games? It is
    not very strange. And that is a sufficient reason in this case; for the <foreign xml:lang="lat">comitia</foreign> are the <foreign xml:lang="lat">comitia</foreign> of the people and the
    multitude. If, then, the magnificence of games is a pleasure, to the people, it is no wonder
    that it was of great service to Lucius Murena with the people. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="39" resp="perseus"><p> But if we ourselves, who, from our constant business, have but little time for amusement, and
    who are able to derive many pleasures of another sort from our business itself; are still
    pleased and interested by exhibitions of games, why should you marvel at the ignorant multitude
    being so? </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="40" resp="perseus"><p> Lucius Otho, <note anchored="true">This refers to
     the law of Lucius Roscius Otho, (called <foreign xml:lang="lat">Roscia Lex</foreign> by Horace,)
     by which the fourteen rows of seats next to those of the senators were reserved for the
     knights.</note> a brave man, and an intimate friend of mine, restored not only its dignity, but
    also its pleasure to the equestrian order; and, therefore, this law which relates to the games
    is the most acceptable of all laws, because by it that most honourable order of men is restored
    not only to its honours, but also to the enjoyment of its amusements. Games, then, believe me,
    are a great delight to men, even to those who are ashamed to own it, and not to <pb n="350"/>
    those only who confess it as I found to be the case in my contest for the consulship; for we
    also had a theatrical representation as our competitor. But if I who, as aedile, had exhibited
    those shows of games, was yet influenced by the games exhibited by Antonius, do you not suppose
    that that very silver stage exhibited by this man, which you laugh at was a serious rival to
    you, who, as it happened, had never given any games at all? </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>