<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi009.perseus-eng2:41-60</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi009.perseus-eng2:41-60</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi009.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="41" resp="perseus"><p>
And, therefore, every one
    in those countries looks upon Cnaeus Pompeius as some one descended from heaven, not as some one
    sent out from this city. Now they begin to believe that there
    really were formerly Romans of the same moderation; which hitherto has seemed to foreign nations
    a thing incredible, a false and ridiculous tradition. Now the splendour of your dominion is
    really brilliant in the eyes of those nations. Now they understand that it was not without
    reason that, when we had magistrates of the same moderation, their ancestors preferred being
    subject to the Roman people to being themselves lords of other nations. But now the access of
    all private individuals to him is so easy, their complaints of the injuries received from others
    are so little checked, that he who in dignity is superior to the noblest men, in affability
    seems to be on a par with the meanest. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="42" resp="perseus"><p> How great his wisdom
    is, how great his authority and fluency in speaking,—and that too is a quality in which the
    dignity of a general is greatly concerned,—you, O Romans, have often experienced yourselves in
    this very place. But how great do you think his good faith must have been towards your allies,
    when the enemies of all nations have placed implicit confidence in it? His humanity is such that
    it is difficult to say, whether the enemy feared his valour more when fighting against him, or
    loved his mildness more when they had been conquered by him. And will any one doubt, that this
    important war ought to be entrusted to him, who seems to have been born by some especial design
    and favour of the gods for the express purpose of finishing all the wars which have existed in
    their own recollection?
   </p></div><milestone n="15" unit="chapter"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="43" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/> And since authority has great weight in conducting wars,
    and in discharging the duties of military command, it certainly is not doubtful to any one that
    in that point this same general is especially preeminent. And who is ignorant that it is of
    great importance in the conduct of wars, what opinion the enemy, and what opinion the allies
    have of your generals, when we know that men are not less influenced in such serious affairs, to
    despise, or fear, or hate, or love a man by common opinion and common report, than by sure
    grounds and principles? What name, then, in the whole world has ever been more illustrious than
    his? whose achievements have ever been equal to his? And, what gives authority in the highest
    degree, concerning whom have you ever passed such numerous and such honourable resolutions?
     </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="44" resp="perseus"><p> Do you believe that there is anywhere in the whole world any
    place so desert that the renown of that day has not reached it, when the whole Roman people, the
    forum being crowded, and all the adjacent temples from which this place can be seen being
    completely filled,—the whole Roman people, I say, demanded Cnaeus Pompeius alone as their
    general in the war in which the common interests of all nations were at stake? Therefore, not to
    say more on the subject, nor to confirm what I say by instances of others as to the influence
    which authority has in war, all our instances of splendid exploits in war must be taken from
    this same Cnaeus Pompeius. The very day that he was appointed by you commander-in-chief of the
    maritime war, in a moment such a cheapness of provisions ensued, (though previously there had
    been a great scarcity of corn, and the price had been exceedingly high,) owing to the hope
    conceived of one single man, and his high reputation, as could scarcely have been produced by a
    most productive harvest after a long period of peace. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="45" resp="perseus"><p> Now,
    too, after the disaster which befell us in <placeName key="tgn,7016619">Pontus</placeName>, from
    the result of that battle, of which, sorely against my will, I just now reminded you, when our
    allies were in a state of alarm, when the power and spirits of our enemies had risen, and the
    province was in a very insufficient state of defence, you would have entirely lost <placeName key="tgn,1000004">Asia</placeName>, O Romans, if the fortune of the Roman people had not, by
    some divine interposition, brought Cnaeus Pompeius at that particular moment into those regions.
    His arrival both checked Mithridates, elated with his unusual victory, and delayed Tigranes, who
    was threatening <placeName key="tgn,1000004">Asia</placeName> with a formidable army. And can
    any one doubt what he will accomplish by his valour, when he did so much by his authority and
    reputation? or how easily he will preserve our allies and our revenues by his power and his
    army, when he defended them by the mere, terror of his name?</p></div><milestone n="16" unit="chapter"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="46" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>Come, now; what a great proof does this circumstance afford us of the influence of the same
    man on the enemies of the Roman people, that all of them, living in countries so far distant
    from us and from each other, surrendered themselves to him alone in so short a time? that the
    ambassadors of the Cretans, though there was at the time a general <note anchored="true">Metellus, afterwards called Creticus, from his victory over the Cretans.</note> and an army of
    ours in their island came almost to the end of the world to Cnaeus Pompeius, and said, all the
    cities of the Cretans were willing to surrender themselves to him? What did Mithridates himself
    do? Did he not send an ambassador into <placeName key="tgn,1000095">Spain</placeName> to the
    same Cnaeus Pompeius? a man whom Pompeius has always considered an ambassador, but who that
    party, to whom it has always been a source of annoyance that he was sent to him particularly,
    have contended was sent as a spy rather than as an ambassador. You can now, then, O Romans, form
    an accurate judgment how much weight you must suppose that this authority of his—now, too, that
    it has been further increased by many subsequent exploits, and by many commendatory resolutions
    of your own—will have with those kings and among foreign nations. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="47" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>It remains for me timidly and briefly to speak of his good fortune, a quality which no man
    ought to boast of in his own case, but which we may remember and commemorate an happening to
    another, just as a man may extol the power of the gods. For my judgment is this, that very often
    commands have been conferred upon, and armies have been entrusted to Maximus, to Marcellus, to
    Scipio, to Marius, and to other great generals, not only on account of their valour, but also on
    account of their good fortune. For there has been, in truth, in the case of some most
    illustrious men, good fortune added as some contribution of the gods to their honour and glory,
    and as a means of performing mighty achievements. But concerning the good fortune of this man of
    whom we are now speaking, I will use so much moderation as not to say that good fortune was
    actually placed in his power, but I will so speak as to appear to remember what is past, to have
    good hope of what is to come; so that my speech may, on the one hand, not appear to the immortal
    gods to be arrogant, nor, on the other hand, to be ungrateful. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="48" resp="perseus"><p> Accordingly, I do not intend to mention, O Romans, what great exploits he has achieved both
    at home and in war, by land and by sea, and with what invariable felicity he has achieved them;
    how, not only the citizens have always consented to his wishes,—the allies complied with
    them,—the enemy obeyed them, but how even the winds and weather have seconded them. I will only
    say this, most briefly,—that no one has ever been so impudent as to dare in silence to wish for
    so many and such great favours as the immortal gods have showered upon Cnaeus Pompeius. And that
    this favour may continue his, and be perpetual, you, O Romans, ought to wish and pray (as,
    indeed, you do), both for the sake of the common safety and prosperity, and for the sake of the
    man himself 
   </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="49" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/> Wherefore, as the war is at the same time so necessary that
    it cannot be neglected, so important that it must be conducted with the greatest care; and since
    you have it in your power to appoint a general to conduct it, in whom there is the most perfect
    knowledge of war, the most extraordinary valour, the most splendid personal influence, and the
    most eminent good fortune, can you hesitate, O Romans, to apply this wonderful advantage which
    is offered you and given you by the immortal gods, to the preservation and increase of the power
    of the republic?
   </p></div><milestone n="17" unit="chapter"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="50" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/> But, if Cnaeus Pompeius were a private individual at
     <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> at this present time, still he would be the man
    who ought to be selected and sent out to so great a war. But now, when to all the other
    exceeding advantages of the appointment, this opportunity is also added,—that he is in those
    very countries already,—that he has an army with him,—that there is another army there which can
    at once be made over to him by those who are in command of it,—why do we delay? or why do we
    not, under the guidance of the immortal gods themselves, commit this royal war also to him to
    whom all the other wars in those parts have been already entrusted to the greatest advantage, to
    the very safety of the republic? </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="51" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>But, to be sure, that most illustrious man, Quintus Catulus, a man most honestly attached to
    the republic, and loaded with your kindness in a way most honourable to him; and also Quintus
    Hortensius, a man endowed with the highest qualities of honour, and fortune, and virtue, and
    genius, disagree to this proposal. And I admit that their authority has in many instances had
    the greatest weight with you, and that it ought to have the greatest weight; but in this cause,
    although you are aware that the opinions of many very brave and illustrious men are unfavourable
    to us, still it is possible for us, disregarding those authorities, to arrive at the truth by
    the circumstances of the case and by reason. And so much the more easily, because those very men
    admit that everything which has been said by me up to this time is true,—that the war is
    necessary, that it is an important war, and that all the requisite qualifications are in the
    highest perfection in Cnaeus Pompeius. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="52" resp="perseus"><p> What, then, does
    Hortensius say? “That if the whole power must be given to one man, Pompeius alone is most worthy
    to have it, but that, nevertheless, the power ought not to be entrusted to one individual.” That
    argument, however, has now become obsolete, having been refuted much more by facts than by
    words. For you, also, Quintus Hortensius, said many things with great force and fluency (as
    might be expected from your exceeding ability, and eminent facility as an orator) in the senate
    against that brave man, Aulus Gabinius, when he had brought forward the law about appointing one
    commander-in-chief against the pirates; and also from this place where I now stand, you made a
    long speech against that law. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="53" resp="perseus"><p> What then? By the immortal
    gods, if your authority had had greater weight with the Roman people than the safety and real
    interests of the Roman people itself, should we have been this day in possession of our present
    glory, and of the empire of the whole earth? Did this, then, appear to you to be dominion, when
    it was a common thing for the ambassadors, and praetors, and quaestors of the Roman people to be
    taken prisoners? when we were cut off from all supplies, both public and private, from all our
    provinces? when all the seas were so closed against us, that we could neither visit any private
    estate of our own, nor any public domain beyond the sea?</p></div><milestone n="18" unit="chapter"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="54" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>What city ever was there before this time,—I speak not of the city of the Athenians, which is
    said formerly to have had a sufficiently extensive naval dominion; nor of that of the
    Carthaginians, who had great power with their fleet and maritime resources; nor of those of the
    Rhodians, whose naval discipline and naval renown has lasted even to our recollection,—but was
    there ever any city before this time so insignificant, if it was only a small island, as not to
    be able by its own power to defend its harbours, and its lands, and some part of its country and
    maritime coast? But, forsooth, for many years before the Gabinian law was passed, the Roman
    people, whose name, till within our own memory remained invincible in naval battles, was
    deprived not only of a great, aye, of much the greatest part of its usefulness, but also of its
    dignity and dominion. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="55" resp="perseus"><p> We, whose ancestors conquered with our
    fleets Antiochus the king, and Perses, and in every naval engagement defeated the Carthaginians,
    the best practiced and best equipped of all men in maritime affairs; we could now in no place
    prove ourselves equal to the pirates. We, who formerly had not only all <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName> in safety, but who were able by the authority of our empire
    to secure the safety of all our allies in the most distant countries, so that even the island of
     <placeName key="perseus,Delos">Delos</placeName>, situated so far from us in the <placeName key="tgn,7002675">Aegean</placeName> sea, at which all men were in the habit of touching with
    their merchandise and their freights, full of riches as it was, little and unwalled as it was,
    still was in no alarm; we, I say, were cut off, not only from our provinces, and from the
    sea-coast of <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>, and from our harbours, but even
    from the Appian road; and at this time, the magistrates of the Roman people were not ashamed to
    come up into this very rostrum where I am standing, which your ancestors had bequeathed to you
    adorned with nautical trophies, and the spoils of the enemy's fleet.</p></div><milestone n="19" unit="chapter"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="56" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>When you opposed that law, the Roman people, O Quintus Hortensius, thought that you, and the
    others who held the same opinion with you, delivered your sentiments in a bold and gallant
    spirit. But still, in a matter affecting the safety of the commonwealth, the Roman people
    preferred consulting its own feelings of indignation to your authority. Accordingly, one law,
    one man, and one year, delivered us not only from that misery and disgrace, but also caused us
    again at length to appear really to be the masters of all nations and countries by land and sea.
     </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="57" resp="perseus"><p> And on this account the endeavour to detract, shall I say
    from Gabinius, or from Pompeius, or (what would be truer still) from both? appears to me
    particularly unworthy; being done in order that Aulus Gabinius might not be appointed lieutenant
    to Cnaeus Pompeius, though he requested and begged it. Is he who begs for a particular
    lieutenant in so important a war unworthy to obtain any one whom he desires, when all other
    generals have taken whatever lieutenants they chose, to assist them in pillaging the allies and
    plundering the provinces? or ought he, by whose law safety and dignity has been given to the
    Roman people, and to all nations, to be prevented from sharing in the glory of that commander
    and that army, which exists through his wisdom and was appointed at his risk? </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="58" resp="perseus"><p> Was it allowed to Caius Falcidius, to Quintus Metellus, to Quintus Caelius
    Laterensis, and to Cnaeus Lentulus, all of whom I name to do them honour, to be lieutenants the
    year after they had been tribunes of the people; and shall men be so exact in the case of
    Gabinius alone, who, in this war which is carried on under the provisions of the Gabinian law,
    and in the case of this commander and this army which he himself appointed with your assistance,
    ought to have the first right of any one? And concerning whose appointment as lieutenant I hope
    that the consuls will bring forward a motion in the senate; and if they hesitate, or are
    unwilling to do so, I undertake to bring it forward myself; nor, O Romans, shall the hostile
    edict of any one deter me from relying on you and defending your privileges and your kindness.
    Nor will I listen to anything except the interposition of the tribunes; and as to that, those
    very men who threaten it, will, I apprehend, consider over and over again what they have a right
    to do. In my own opinion, O Romans, Aulus Gabinius alone has a right to be put by the side of
    Cnaeus Pompeius as a partner of the glory of his exploits in the maritime war; because the one,
    with the assistance of your votes, gave to that man alone the task of undertaking that war, and
    the other, when it entrusted to him, undertook it and terminated it.</p></div><milestone n="20" unit="chapter"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="59" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>It remains for me to speak of the authority and opinion of Quintus Catulus; who, when he asked
    of you, if you thus placed all your dependence on Cnaeus Pompeius, in whom you would have any
    hope, if anything were to happen to him, received a splendid reward for his own virtue and
    worth, when you all, with almost one voice, cried out that you would, in that case, put your
    trust in him. In truth he is such a man, that no affair can be so important, or so difficult,
    that, he cannot manage it by his wisdom, or defend it by his integrity, or terminate it by his
    valour. But, in this case, I entirely differ from him; because, the less certain and the less
    lasting the life of man is, the more ought the republic to avail itself of the life and valour
    of any admirable man, as long as the immortal gods allow it to do so. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="60" resp="perseus"><p> But let no innovation be established contrary to the precedents and principles
    of our ancestors.— I will not say, at this moment, that our ancestors in peace always obeyed
    usage, but in war were always guided by expediency, and always accommodated themselves with new
    plans to the new emergencies of the times. I will not say that two most important wars, the
    Punic war and the Spanish war, were put an end to by one general; that two most powerful cities,
    which threatened the greatest danger to this empire— <placeName key="perseus,Carthage">Carthage</placeName> and <placeName key="tgn,7017511">Numantia</placeName>, were destroyed by
    the same Scipio. I will not remind you that it was but lately determined by you and by your
    ancestors, to rest all the hopes of the empire on Caius Marius, so that the same man conducted
    the war against Jugurtha, and against the Cimbri, and against the Teutones. But recollect, in
    the case of Cnaeus Pompeius himself, with reference to whom Catulus objects to having any new
    regulations introduced, how many new laws have been made with the most willing consent of
    Quintus Catulus.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>