<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi005.perseus-eng2:2.3.167-2.3.172</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi005.perseus-eng2:2.3.167-2.3.172</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi005.perseus-eng2"><div type="textpart" subtype="actio" n="2"><div type="textpart" subtype="book" n="3"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="167" resp="perseus"><p> He is annoyed and waiting to see what Vettius will say. He will say nothing
                because of this present occasion; nothing of his free will, nothing of which we can
                think that he might have spoken either way. He sent letters into <placeName key="tgn,7003122">Sicily</placeName> to Carpinatius, when he was superintendent of
                the tax derived from the pasture lands, and manager of that company of farmers,
                which letters I found at <placeName key="perseus,Syracuse">Syracuse</placeName>, in
                Carpinatius's house, among the portfolios of letters which had been brought to him;
                and at <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> in the house of Lucius
                Tullius, an intimate friend of yours, and another manager of the company, in
                portfolios of letters which had been received by him. And from these letters
                observe, I pray you, the impudence of this man's usury. [The letters of Lucius
                Vettius to Publius Servilius, and to Caius Antistius, managers of the company, are
                read.] <milestone unit="Para"/>Vettius says that he will be with you, and will take
                notice how you make up your accounts for the treasury; so that, if you do not
                restore to the people this money which has been put out at interest, you shall
                restore it to the company. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="168" resp="perseus"><p> Can we not establish what we assert by this witness, can we not establish it by
                the letters of Publius Servilius and Caius Antistius, managers of the company, men
                of the highest reputation and of the highest honour, and by the authority of the
                company whose letters we are using? or must we seek for something on which we can
                rely more, for something more important? <milestone n="72" unit="chapter"/><milestone unit="Para"/> Vettius, your most intimate friend,—Vettius, your
                connection, to whose sister you are married,—Vettius, the brother of your wife, the
                brother of your quaestor, bears witness to your most infamous theft, to your most
                evident embezzlement; for by what other name is a lending of the public money at
                usury to be called? Read what follows. He says that your clerk, O Verres, was the
                drawer up of the bond for this usury: the managers threaten him also in their
                letters; in fact, it happened by chance that two managers were with Vettius. They
                think it intolerable that twenty-four per cent should be taken from them, and they
                are right to think so. For whoever did such a thing before? who ever attempted to do
                such a thing,—who ever thought that such a thing could be done, as for a magistrate
                to venture to take money as interest from the farmers, though the senate had often
                assisted the farmers by remitting the interests due from them? Certainly that man
                could have no hope of safety, if the farmers—that is, the Roman knights, were the
                judges. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="169" resp="perseus"><p> He ought to have less hope now, O judges, now that you have to decide; and so much
                the less, in proportion as it is more honourable to be roused by the injuries of
                others than by one's own. What reply do you think of making to all this? Will you
                deny that you did it? Will you defend yourself on the ground that it was lawful for
                you to do it? How can you deny it? Can you deny it, to be convicted by the authority
                of such important letters, by so many farmers appearing as witnesses? But how can
                you say it was lawful? In truth, if I were to prove that you, in your own province,
                had lent on usury your own money, and not the money of the Roman people, still you
                could not escape; but when I prove that you lent the public money, the money decreed
                to you to buy corn with, and that you received interest from the farmers, will you
                make any one believe that this was lawful? a deed than which not only others have
                never, but you yourself have never done a more audacious or more infamous one. I
                cannot, in truth, O judges, say that even that which appears to me to be perfectly
                unprecedented, and about which I am going to speak next—I mean, the fact of his
                having actually paid very many cities nothing at all for their corn—was either more
                audacious or more impudent; the booty derived from this act was perhaps greater, but
                the impudence of the other was certainly not less. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="170" resp="perseus"><p> And since I have said enough about this lending at interest, now, I pray you, give
                your attention to the question of the embezzlement of the whole sum in many
                instances. <milestone n="73" unit="chapter"/><milestone unit="Para"/> There are many
                cities in <placeName key="tgn,7003122">Sicily</placeName>, O judges, of great
                splendour and of high reputation, and among the very first of these is the city of
                Halesa. You will find no city more faithful to its duties, more rich in wealth, more
                influential in its authority. After that man had ordered it to furnish every year
                sixty thousand <foreign xml:lang="la">modii</foreign> of wheat, he took money for
                the wheat, at the price which wheat bore in <placeName key="tgn,7003122">Sicily</placeName> at the time; all the money which he thus received from the
                public treasury, he kept for himself. I was amazed, O judges, when a man of the
                greatest ability, of the highest wisdom, and of the greatest influence, Aeneas of
                Halesa, first stated this to me at Halesa in the senate of Halesa; a man to whom the
                senate by public resolution had given a charge to return me and my brother thanks,
                and at the same time to explain to us the matters which concerned this trial. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="171" resp="perseus"><p> He proves to me that this was his constant custom and system; that, when the
                entire quantity of corn had been brought to him under the name of tenths, then he
                was accustomed to exact money from the cities, to object to the corn delivered, and
                as for all the corn which he was forced to send to <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName>, he sent that quantity from his own profits and from his own
                store of corn. I demand the accounts, I inspect the documents, I see that the people
                of Halesa, from whom sixty thousand <foreign xml:lang="la">modii</foreign> had bees
                levied, had given none, that they had paid money to Volcatus, and to Timarchides the
                clerk. I find a case of plunder of this kind, O judges, that the praetor, whose duty
                it was to buy corn, did not buy it, but sell it; and that he embezzles and
                appropriates the money which he ought to have divided among the cities. It did not
                appear to me any longer to be a theft, but a monster and a prodigy; to reject the
                corn of the cities, and to approve of his own; when he had approved of his own, then
                to put a price on that corn, to take from the cities what he had fixed, and to
                retain what he had received from the Roman people. </p></div><milestone n="74" unit="chapter"/><milestone unit="Para"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="172" resp="perseus"><p> How many degrees of offence in one single act of fraud do you think will be
                enough, if I insist on them severally, to bring the matter to a point where he can
                go no further? You reject the Sicilian corn; why? because you are sending some
                yourself. Have you any <placeName key="tgn,7003122">Sicily</placeName> of your own,
                which can supply you corn of another sort? When the senate decrees that corn he
                bought in <placeName key="tgn,7003122">Sicily</placeName>, or when the people order
                this, this, as I imagine, is what they mean, that Sicilian corn is to be brought
                from <placeName key="tgn,7003122">Sicily</placeName>. When you reject all the corn
                of <placeName key="tgn,7003122">Sicily</placeName>, do you send corn to <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> from <placeName key="tgn,7016833">Egypt</placeName> or from <placeName key="tgn,1000140">Syria</placeName>? You
                reject the corn of Halesa, of Cephalaedis, of Thermae, of Amestras, of <placeName key="perseus,Tyndaris">Tyndaris</placeName>, of Herbita, and of many other cities.
                What has happened then to cause the lands of these people to bear corn of such a
                sort while you were praetor, as they never bore before, so that it can neither be
                approved of by you, nor by the Roman people; especially when the managers of the
                different companies had taken corn, being the tenths, from the same land, and of the
                same year, to <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName>? What has happened that
                the corn which made part of the tenths was approved, and that that which was bought,
                though out of the same barn, was not approved of? Is there any doubt that all that
                rejection of corn was contrived with the object of raising money? </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>