<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi005.perseus-eng2:2.2.71-2.2.76</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi005.perseus-eng2:2.2.71-2.2.76</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi005.perseus-eng2"><div type="textpart" subtype="actio" n="2"><div type="textpart" subtype="book" n="2"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="71" resp="perseus"><p> And when they came thither, when the same men came in numbers on the bench who
                were used to sit there, and when the whole defence of Sopater rested on this hope,
                namely, on the number and dignity of the bench of judges, and on the fact of their
                being, as I have said before, the same men who had before acquitted Sopater of the
                same charge, mark the open rascality and audacity of the man, not attempted to be
                disguised, I will not say under any reason, but with even the least dissimulation.
                He orders Marcus Petilius, a Roman knight, whom he had with him on the bench, to
                attend to a private cause in which he was judge. Petilius refused, because Verres
                himself was detaining his friends whom he had wished to have with him on the bench.
                He, liberal man, said that he did not wish to detain any of the men who preferred
                being with Petilius. And so they all go; for the rest also prevail upon him not to
                detain them, saying that they wished to appear in favour of one or other of the
                parties who were concerned in that trial. And so he is left alone with his most
                worthless retinue. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="72" resp="perseus"><p> Minucius, who was defending Sopater, did not doubt that Verres, since he had
                dismissed the whole bench, would not proceed with the investigation of his cause
                that day; when all of a sudden he is ordered to state his case. He answers, “To
                whom?” “To me,” says Verres, “if I appear to you of sufficient dignity to try the
                cause of a Sicilian, a Greek.” “Certainly,” says he, “you are of sufficient dignity,
                but I wish for the presence of those men who were present before, and were
                acquainted with the case.” “State your case,” says he; “they cannot be present.”
                “For in truth,” says Quintus Minucius, “Petilius begged me also to be with him on
                the bench;” and at the same time he began to leave his seat as counsel. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="73" resp="perseus"><p> Verres, in a rage, attacks him with pretty violent language, and even began to
                threaten him severely, for bringing such a charge, and trying to excite such odium
                against him. <milestone n="30" unit="chapter"/><milestone unit="Para"/> Minucius,
                who lived as a merchant at <placeName key="perseus,Syracuse">Syracuse</placeName>,
                in such a way as always to bear in mind his rights and his dignity and who knew that
                it became him not to increase his property in the province at the expense of any
                portion of his liberty, gave the man such answer as seemed good to him, and as the
                occasion and the cause required. He said that he would not speak in defence of his
                client when the bench of judges was sent away and dismissed. And so he left the bar.
                And all the other friends and advocates of Sopater, except the Sicilians, did the
                same. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="74" resp="perseus"><p> Verres, though he is a man of incredible effrontery and audacity, yet when he was
                thus suddenly left alone got frightened and agitated. He did not know what to do, or
                which way to turn. If he adjourned the investigation at that time, he knew that when
                those men were present, whom he had got rid of for the time, Sopater would be
                acquitted; but if he condemned an unfortunate and innocent man, (while he himself,
                the praetor, was without any colleagues, and the defendant without any counsel or
                patron,) and rescinded the decision of Caius Sacerdos, he thought that he should not
                be able to withstand the unpopularity of such an act. So he was quite in a fever
                with perplexity. He turned himself every way, not only as to his mind, but also as
                to his body; so that all who were present could plainly see that fear and
                covetousness were contending together in his heart. There was a great crowd of
                people present, there was profound silence, and eager expectation which way his
                covetousness was going to find vent. His attendant Timarchides was constantly
                stooping down to his ear. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="75" resp="perseus"><p> Then at last he said, “Come, state your case.” Sopater began to implore him by the
                good faith of gods and man, to hear the cause in company with the rest of the bench.
                He orders the witnesses to be summoned instantly. One or two of them give their
                evidence briefly. No questions are asked. The crier proclaims that the case is
                closed. Verres, as if he were afraid that Petilius, having either finished or
                adjourned the private cause on which he was engaged, might return to the bench with
                the rest, jumps down in haste from his seat; he condemned an innocent man, one who
                had been acquitted by Caius Sacerdos, without hearing him in his defence, by the
                joint sentence of a secretary, a physician, and a soothsayer.</p></div><milestone n="31" unit="chapter"/><milestone unit="Para"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="76" resp="perseus"><p> Keep, pray keep that man in the city, O judges. Spare him and preserve him, that
                you may have a man to assist you in judging causes; to declare his opinion in the
                senate on questions of war and peace, without any covetous desires. Although,
                indeed, we and the Roman people have less cause to be anxious as to what his opinion
                in the senate is likely to be: for what will be his authority? When will he have
                either the daring or the power to deliver his opinion? When will a man of such
                luxury and such indolence ever attempt to mount up to the senate-house except in the
                month of February? <note anchored="true">In the month of February, as has been said
                  before, the senate gave audience to the deputies from foreign nations, and these
                  deputies were accustomed to bring rich presents to the senators who favoured their
                  respective nations.</note> However, let him come; let him vote war against the
                Cretans, liberty to the Byzantines; let him call Ptolemy king; let him say and think
                everything which Hortensius wishes him. These things do not so immediately concern
                us—have not such immediate reference to the risk of our lives, or to the peril of
                our fortunes. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>