<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi002.perseus-eng2:29-42</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi002.perseus-eng2:29-42</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi002.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="29" resp="perseus"><p>With this plan, and urged on to
          such a degree by this madness, they have handed the man over to you to be put to death,
          whom they themselves, when they wished, were unable to murder. 
        <milestone n="11" unit="chapter" resp="yonge"/><milestone unit="Para"/>
          What shall I complain of first? or from what point had I best begin, O judges? or what
          assistance shall I seek, or from whom? Shall I implore at this time the aid of the
          immortal gods, or that of the Roman people, or of your integrity, you who have the supreme
          power?</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="30" resp="perseus"><p>The father infamously murdered; the house
          besieged; the property taken away, seized and plundered by enemies; the life of the son,
          hostile to their purposes, attacked over and over again by sword and treachery. What
          wickedness does there seem to be wanting in these numberless atrocities? And yet they
          crown and add to them by other nefarious deeds, they invent an incredible accusation; they
          procure witnesses against him and accusers of him by bribery; they offer the wretched man
          this alternative, whether he would prefer to expose his neck to Roscius to be assassinated
          by him, or, being sewn in a sack, to lose his life with the greatest infamy. They thought
          advocates would be wanting to him; they are wanting. There is not wanting in truth, O
          judges, one who will speak with freedom, and who will defend him with integrity, which is
          quite sufficient in this cause, (since I have undertaken it).</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="31" resp="perseus"><p>And perhaps in undertaking this cause I may have acted rashly, in
          obedience to the impulses of youth; but since I have once undertaken it, although forsooth
          every sort of terror and every possible danger were to threaten me on all sides, yet I
          will support and encounter them. I have deliberately resolved not only to say everything
          which I think is material to the cause, but to say it also willingly, boldly, and freely.
          Nothing can ever be of such importance in my mind that fear should be able to put a
          greater constraint on me than a regard to good faith.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="32" resp="perseus"><p>Who, indeed, is of so profligate a disposition, as, when he sees these things, to be able
          to be silent and to disregard them? You have murdered my father when he had not been
          proscribed; you have classed him when murdered in the number of proscribed persons; you
          have driven me by force from my house; you are in possession of my patrimony. What would
          you more? have you not come even before the bench with sword and arms, that you may either
          convict Sextus Roscius or murder him in this presence?</p></div><milestone n="12" unit="chapter" resp="yonge"/><milestone unit="Para"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="33" resp="perseus"><p>We lately had a most audacious man in this city, Caius Fimbria, a man, as is well known
          among all except among those who are mad themselves, utterly insane. He, when at the
          funeral of Caius Marius, had contrived that Quintus Scaevola, the most venerable and
          accomplished man in our city, should be wounded;—(a man in whose praise there is neither
          room to say much here, nor indeed is it possible to say more than the Roman people
          preserves in its recollection)—he, I say, brought an accusation against Scaevola, when he
          found that he might possibly live. When the question was asked him, what he was going to
          accuse that man of, whom no one could praise in a manner sufficiently suitable to his
          worth, they say that the man, like a madman as he was, answered, for not having received
          the whole weapon in his body. A more lamentable thing was never seen by the Roman people,
          unless it were the death of that same man, which was so important that it crushed and
          broke the hearts of all his fellow-citizens; for endeavouring to save whom by an
          arrangement, he was destroyed by them. <note anchored="true">Scaevola was trying to effect
            an accommodation between the parties of Sulla and Marius when he was murdered by them. </note></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="34" resp="perseus"><p>Is not this case very like that speech and action of
          Fimbria? You are accusing Sextus Roscius. Why so? Because he escaped out of your hands;
          because he did not allow himself to be murdered. The one action, because it was done
          against Scaevola, appears scandalous; this one, because it is done by Chrysogonus, is
          intolerable. For, in the name of the immortal gods, what is there in this cause that
          requires a defence? What topic is there requiring the ability of an advocate, or even very
          much needing eloquence of speech? Let us, O judges, unfold the whole case, and when it is
          set before our eyes, let us consider it; by this means you will easily understand on what
          the whole case turns, and on what matters I ought to dwell, and what decision you ought to
          come to.</p></div><milestone n="13" unit="chapter" resp="yonge"/><milestone unit="Para"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="35" resp="perseus"><p>There are three things, as I think, which are at the present time hindrances to Sextus
          Roscius:—the charge brought by his adversaries, their audacity, and their power. Erucius
          has taken on himself the pressing of this false charge as accuser; the Roscii have claimed
          for themselves that part which is to be executed by audacity; but Chrysogonus, as being
          the person of the greatest influence, employs his influence in the contest. On all these
          points I am aware that I must speak.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="36" resp="perseus"><p>What then am I to
          say? I must not speak in the same manner on them all; because the first topic indeed
          belongs to my duty, but the two others the Roman people have imposed on you. I must efface
          the accusations; you ought both to resist the audacity, and at the earliest possible
          opportunity to extinguish and put down the pernicious and intolerable influence of men of
          that sort.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="37" resp="perseus"><p>Sextus Roscius is accused of having murdered
          his father. O ye immortal gods! a wicked and nefarious action, in which one crime every
          sort of wickedness appears to be contained. In truth, if, as is well said by wise men,
          affection is often injured by a look, what sufficiently severe punishment can be devised
          against him who has inflicted death on his parent, for whom all divine and human laws
          bound him to be willing to die himself, if occasion required?</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="38" resp="perseus"><p>In the case of so enormous, so atrocious, so singular a crime, as this
          one which has been committed so rarely, that, if it is ever heard of, it is accounted like
          a portent and prodigy—what arguments do you think, O Caius Erucius, you as the accuser
          ought to use? Ought you not to prove the singular audacity of him who is accused of it?
          and his savage manners, and brutal nature, and his life devoted to every sort of vice and
          crime, his whole character, in short, given up to profligacy and abandoned? None of which
          things have you alleged against Sextus Roscius, not even for the sake of making the
          imputation.</p></div><milestone n="14" unit="chapter" resp="yonge"/><milestone unit="Para"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="39" resp="perseus"><p>Sextus Roscius has murdered his father. What sort of man is he? is he a young man,
          corrupted, and led on by worthless men? He is more than forty years old. Is he forsooth an
          old assassin, a bold man, and one well practised in murder? You have not heard this so
          much as mentioned by the accuser. To be sure; then, luxury, and the magnitude of his
          debts, and the ungovernable desires of his disposition, have urged the man to this
          wickedness? Erucius acquitted him of luxury, when he said that he was scarcely ever
          present at any banquet. But he never owed anything Further what evil desires could exist
          in that man who as his accuser himself objected to him has always lived in the country and
          spent his time in cultivating his land, a mode of life which is utterly removed from
          covetousness, and inseparably allied to virtue?</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="40" resp="perseus"><p>What
          was it then which inspired Sextus Roscius with such madness as that? Oh, says he, he did
          not please his father. He did not please his father? For what reason? for it must have
          been both a just and an important and a notorious reason. For as this is incredible, that
          death should be inflicted on a father by a son, without many and most weighty reasons; so
          this, too, is not probable, that a son should be hated by his father, without many and
          important and necessary causes.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="41" resp="perseus"><p>Let us return again to
          the same point, and ask what vices existed in this his only son of such importance as to
          make him incur the displeasure of his father. But it is notorious he had no vices. His
          father then was mad to bate him whom he had begotten, without any cause. But he was the
          most reasonable and sensible of men. This, then, is evident, that, if the father was not
          crazy, nor his son profligate, the father had no cause for displeasure, nor the son for
          crime.</p></div><milestone n="15" unit="chapter" resp="yonge"/><milestone unit="Para"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="42" resp="perseus"><p>I know not, says he, what cause for displeasure there was; but I know that displeasure
          existed; because formerly, when he had two sons, he chose that other one, who is dead; to
          be at all times with himself, but sent this other one to his farms in the country. The
          same thing which happened to Erucius in supporting this wicked and trifling charge, has
          happened to me in advocating a most righteous cause. He could find no means of supporting
          this trumped-up charge; I can hardly find out by what arguments I am to invalidate and get
          rid of such trifling circumstances.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>